APA 6th Edition Bobinac, M. (2015). The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective. Umjetnost riječi, 59 (3-4), 239-260. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829
MLA 8th Edition Bobinac, Marijan. "The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective." Umjetnost riječi, vol. 59, br. 3-4, 2015, str. 239-260. https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829. Citirano 08.08.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Bobinac, Marijan. "The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective." Umjetnost riječi 59, br. 3-4 (2015): 239-260. https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829
Harvard Bobinac, M. (2015). 'The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective', Umjetnost riječi, 59(3-4), str. 239-260. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829 (Datum pristupa: 08.08.2020.)
Vancouver Bobinac M. The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective. Umjetnost riječi [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 08.08.2020.];59(3-4):239-260. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829
IEEE M. Bobinac, "The Habsburg Legacy from a Postcolonial and Postimperial Perspective", Umjetnost riječi, vol.59, br. 3-4, str. 239-260, 2015. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/161829. [Citirano: 08.08.2020.]
Sažetak In the discourse on the Habsburg Monarchy, two opposing attitudes prevail. Depending on one’s perspective, which can be nationally exclusive or nostalgic, the Monarchy is perceived either as a “peoples’ dungeon” (Völkerkerker) or “unity in multiplicity” (Einheit in der Vielheit). A group of researchers has recently invested much effort to overcome this discursive gap, by applying a theoretical paradigm called the Habsburg Postcolonial. This theoretical approach relies on Anglo-Saxon postcolonial studies and recent research into Central European cultural phenomena, and analyzes opposing cultural forces in the Danube Monarchy (a multinational state formation of questionable colonial importance), by focusing on: the intertwining of language, culture and politics; images of the self and others; dynamics between the center and periphery; and particularism and universalism. Unlike overseas colonialism, dichotomies such as that of center and periphery do not appear in pure forms in complex empires such as the Habsburg Monarchy, so there is a strong tendency among scholars to use postimperial theories when researching this area. This article is concluded with a short case study that shows how the same historic material—a story about medieval Hungarian nobleman Bánk—was transposed in a variety of (supra)national contexts in the turbulent nineteenth century.