hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4

The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function

Ksenija Magda   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-063X ; University of Zagreb, The Center for Protestant Theology ‘Matija Vlačić Ilirik’
Jasmin Zemunović ; University of Zagreb, The Center for Protestant Theology ‘Matija Vlačić Ilirik’

Fulltext: english, pdf (144 KB) pages 223-244 downloads: 362* cite
APA 6th Edition
Magda, K. & Zemunović, J. (2019). The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function. Kairos, 13 (2), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4
MLA 8th Edition
Magda, Ksenija and Jasmin Zemunović. "The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function." Kairos, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 223-244. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4. Accessed 23 Oct. 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Magda, Ksenija and Jasmin Zemunović. "The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function." Kairos 13, no. 2 (2019): 223-244. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4
Harvard
Magda, K., and Zemunović, J. (2019). 'The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function', Kairos, 13(2), pp. 223-244. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4
Vancouver
Magda K, Zemunović J. The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function. Kairos [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 October 23];13(2):223-244. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4
IEEE
K. Magda and J. Zemunović, "The Pharisees in Mark: Comparing their Social-Historic Role and their Narrative Function", Kairos, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 223-244, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.32862/k.13.2.4

Abstracts
The main purpose of this paper is to compare the facts about the Pharisees that we learn from extra-biblical sources against the facts we learn from the narrative in Mk. 1:21-3:35, with the purpose of setting a historical foundation for Mark’s account. In the first section we show the available historical accounts and we conclude it to be ambivalent, while in the second section we portray the developing conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees, which in turn sheds light on historical facts in line with the conclusion that Mark’s description of the Pharisees is historically plausible, because of this Mark’s Gospel can be used for its contribution to the historical discussion about the Pharisees.
The paper is divided into two sections. The first, historical, section deals with the attempt to reconstruct the relationship between Jesus and the Pharisees based on historical data, and the second, exegetic section, uses narrative criticism to develop the history and the kerygma.

Keywords
Gospel of Mark; Pharisees; Jesus and the Pharisees; Mark 1:21-3:35

Hrčak ID: 229411

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/229411

Visits: 542 *