<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="abstract" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Cardiol Croat</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Cardiologia Croatica</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Cardiol. Croat.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1848-543X</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1848-5448</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Croatian Cardiac Society</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC 2025 20_5-6_112-3</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15836/ccar2025.112</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Extended Abstract</subject></subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="subheading"><subject>Scientific abstracts</subject></subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Predictors of residual shunt following patent foramen ovale closure: insights from University Hospital Centre Zagreb</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-4450</contrib-id><name><surname>Kova&#x010D;</surname><given-names>Antun Zvonimir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-7271</contrib-id><name><surname>Mari&#x0107; Be&#x0161;i&#x0107;</surname><given-names>Kristina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-5505</contrib-id><name><surname>Do&#x0161;en</surname><given-names>Denis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-3236</contrib-id><name><surname>Re&#x0161;kovi&#x0107; Luk&#x0161;i&#x0107;</surname><given-names>Vlatka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-6137</contrib-id><name><surname>Jak&#x0161;i&#x0107; Jurinjak</surname><given-names>Sandra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-9720</contrib-id><name><surname>Ivanac Vrane&#x0161;i&#x0107;</surname><given-names>Irena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-6503</contrib-id><name><surname>Bulum</surname><given-names>Jo&#x0161;ko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University Hospital Centre Zagreb</institution>, <addr-line>Zagreb</addr-line>, <country country="hr">Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Zagreb</institution>, <institution content-type="dept">School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Zagreb</addr-line>, <country country="hr">Croatia</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>*</label>ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Antun Zvonimir Kova&#x010D;, Klini&#x010D;ki bolni&#x010D;ki centar Zagreb, Ki&#x0161;pati&#x0107;eva 12, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia. / Phone: +385992924808 / E-mail: <email xlink:href="azkovac@gmail.com">azkovac@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print"><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>5-6</issue>
<fpage>112</fpage>
<lpage>113</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Croatian Cardiac Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Croatian Cardiac Society</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><title>KEYWORDS: </title><kwd>patent formen ovale closure</kwd><kwd>residual shunt</kwd><kwd>transthoracic echocardiography bubble test</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p><bold>Introduction:</bold> Recent studies report that the incidence of residual shunting after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure ranges from 10% to 30% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1"><italic>1</italic></xref>). Several factors have been proposed as potential predictors, including anatomical characteristics of the PFO tunnel, the presence of atrial septal aneurysms, and occluder device size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2"><italic>2</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3"><italic>3</italic></xref>). This study aims to evaluate the incidence of residual shunting and identify its predictors in patients who underwent PFO closure at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb.</p>
<p><bold>Patients and Methods:</bold> We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PFO closure at UHC Zagreb. Pre-implantation transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measurements included PFO tunnel size and septal aneurysm presence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure 1</bold></xref>). Implanted device size was recorded from hospital charts. Residual shunting was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) bubble test during Valsalva maneuver at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure 2</bold></xref>). Statistical analysis included chi-square test, Cramer&#x2019;s V test, and linear multivariate regression.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>FIGURE 1</label><caption><p>Transesophageal echocardiography showing the patent foramen ovale opening during the Valsalva maneuver.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="CC202520_5-6_112-3-f1"></graphic></fig>
<fig id="f2" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>FIGURE 2</label><caption><p>Transthoracic echocardiography bubble test showing residual shunting during the Valsalva maneuver.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="CC202520_5-6_112-3-f2"></graphic></fig>
<p><bold>Results:</bold> Of 104 attempted PFO closures, device implantation was successful in 100 patients (96.2%). Device size data were available for 98 patients who received the Amplatzer occluder: 50 (51.0%) received an 18/25 mm device, 15 (15.3%) a 25/25 mm device, 9 (9.2%) a 25/30 mm device, 14 (14.3%) a 25/35 mm device, and 10 (10.2%) a 30/30 mm device. Residual shunting was detected in 18 patients (18.0%) exclusively via TTE bubble test. Pre-implantation TEE measurements were available for 54 patients (54.0%) for PFO tunnel width (mean 3.9 &#x00B1; 2.4 mm) and 51 (51.0%) for tunnel length (mean 10.9 &#x00B1; 3.6 mm). Atrial septal aneurysm was reported in 33 patients (33.0%). Larger device size (p&lt;0.001) and left atrial disk (p&lt;0.001) were independent risk factors for residual shunting.</p>
<p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The incidence of residual shunting observed in our study (18.0%) aligns with reports from other centers. Notably, all residual shunts were detected exclusively by the TTE bubble test. In our patient population, the only significant predictors of residual shunting were larger device size, particularly the left atrial disk, whereas other studies have identified anatomical PFO features that increase risk.</p>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>LITERATURE</title>
<ref id="r1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mi</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Relation between anatomical features of patent foramen ovale and residual shunt based on transesophageal echocardiography.</article-title> <source>Sci Rep</source>. <year>2025</year> January 9;<volume>15</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1497</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-024-82122-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39789058</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marchese</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Pacilli</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Inchingolo</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Fanelli</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Loperfido</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Vigna</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with AMPLATZER occluder devices - influence of anatomic features: a transcranial Doppler and intracardiac echocardiography study.</article-title> <source>EuroIntervention</source>. <year>2013</year> July;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>382</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4244/EIJV9I3A61</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23872652</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>von Bardeleben</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Otto</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Himmrich</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Schnabel</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kampmann</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm.</article-title> <source>Int J Cardiol</source>. <year>2009</year> May 1;<volume>134</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.02.031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18715659</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
