<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with MathML3 v1.1 20151215//EN " "JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.1" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.15567/mljekarstvo</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="hr">Mljekarstvo</journal-title>
        <journal-subtitle xml:lang="hr">Dairy Experts Journal</journal-subtitle>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
          <trans-title>Mljekarstvo</trans-title>
          <trans-subtitle>Dairy Experts Journal</trans-subtitle>
        </trans-title-group>
        <abbrev-journal-title>Mljekarstvo</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0026-704X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1846-4025</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="hr">Hrvatska mljekarska udruga</publisher-name>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">Croatian Dairy Union</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>
          <addr-line>Ilica 31/III, 10000 Zagreb</addr-line>
          <email xlink:href="hmu@hmu.hr">hmu@hmu.hr</email>
        </publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15567/mljekarstvo.2025.0304</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="hr">
          <subject>Izvorni znanstveni članak</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Original scientific paper</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">Technological, molecular, and safety characterization of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria in Moroccan Jben cheese: Towards the development of a native starter culture</article-title>
        <trans-title-group>
          <trans-title xml:lang="hr">Tehnološka, molekularna i sigurnosna karakterizacija autohtonih bakterija mliječne kiseline u marokanskom Jben siru: u sklopu razvoja izvorne starter kulture</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Azzouz</surname>
            <given-names>Safae</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="bdd.azzsafae@gmail.com">bdd.azzsafae@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Ahadaf</surname>
            <given-names>Soumaya</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Zantar</surname>
            <given-names>Said</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>El Galiou</surname>
            <given-names>Ouiam</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Arakrak</surname>
            <given-names>Abdelhay</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Bakkali</surname>
            <given-names>Mohammed</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Laglaoui</surname>
            <given-names>Amin</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <day>15</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>75</volume>
      <fpage>174</fpage>
      <lpage>186</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="">
          <license-p>CC BY-NC (Attribution, Non Commercial)</license-p>
        </license>
        <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="hr">
          <license-p>Sadržaj časopisa je besplatan i ne naplaćuje se objavljivanje radova.&#13;
Puni tekst i sažeci radova objavljeni u časopisu Mljekarstvo mogu se koristiti u znanstvenoistraživačke svrhe, uz obavezno navođenje izvora i poštivanje autorskih prava (licenca Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
        <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en">
          <license-p>The content of the Journal is available free of charge and there are no publication charges.&#13;
The contents of the Mljekarstvo can be used for scientific purposes, provided that the credit is given to the Journal (under Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The present study involved the technological, molecular, and safety characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Moroccan Jben cheese. A total of eighty-nine Gram-positive, catalase-negative isolates were initially assessed for acidifying and proteolytic activity, with positive strains screened for additional traits, including citrate utilization, gas production, lipolytic activity, aroma and diacetyl production, and antibacterial activity. Species identification was achieved via species-specific PCR and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. It was revealed that sixty-seven strains (75.3 %) displayed at least two technological properties (acidification and proteolysis) with most classified as Enterococcus (67.2 %), Lactococcus (25.4 %), and, to a lesser extent, Lactiplantibacillus (6 %) and Leuconostoc (1.5 %) species. None of the isolates utilised citrate or exhibited lipolytic activity. Only Leuconostoc mesenteroides produced gas. Pleasing aromas were detected in 62.7 % of strains, while 26.9 % emitted sulphurous notes. Diacetyl production was observed in 79.1 % of the isolates, with Lactiplantibacillus and Enterococcus identified as the primary producers. Only Enterococcus strains (60 %) demonstrated antilisterial activity. For safety purposes, all Enterococcus faecalis strains, as well as some Enterococcus faecium strains that did not exhibit antibacterial activity, were excluded from the collection. The remaining strains (n=25) underwent autolysis and further safety testing. Autolysis patterns varied by strain, with some Lactococcus species exhibiting good autolytic potential. Safety assessments indicated partial haemolysis in some Enterococcus faecium strains, while antibiotic resistance analysis revealed higher resistance in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Leuconostoc mesenteroides, primarily of intrinsic origin. This study identified multiple strains of Lactococcus lactis with promising technological and safety profile, suggesting their suitability as effective starters for Jben cheese production.</p>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="hr">
        <p>Ovo istraživanje uključivalo je tehnološku, molekularnu i sigurnosnu karakterizaciju bakterija mliječne kiseline izoliranih iz tradicionalnog marokanskog Jben sira. Zakiseljavanje i proteolitička aktivnost procijenjena je za osamdeset i devet gram-pozitivnih, katalaza-negativnih izolata. Kod pozitivnih sojeva istražena su dodatna svojstva: iskorištavanje citrata, proizvodnja plina, lipolitička aktivnost, proizvodnja arome i diacetila te antibakterijska aktivnost. Identifikacija vrste postignuta je PCR-om specifičnom za vrstu i djelomičnim sekvenciranjem gena 16S rRNA. Otkriveno je da je šezdeset sedam sojeva (75,3 %) pokazalo najmanje dva tehnološka svojstva (zakiseljavanje i proteoliza), a većina ih je klasificirana kao Enterococcus (67,2 %), Lactococcus (25,4 %) i u manjoj mjeri Lactiplantibacillus (6 %) te Leuconostoc (1,5 %). Nijedan od izolata nije sadržavao citrat niti je pokazao lipolitičku aktivnost. Samo je Leuconostoc mesenteroides proizvodio plin. Ugodne arome utvrđene su kod 62,7 % sojeva, dok je 26,9 % proizvodilo sumporne note. Proizvodnja diacetila uočena je u 79,1 % izolata, pri čemu su Lactiplantibacillus i Enterococcus identificirani kao primarni proizvođači. Samo su Enterococcus sojevi (60 %) pokazali antilisterijsko djelovanje. Iz sigurnosnih razloga iz zbirke su isključeni svi sojevi Enterococcus faecalis, kao i neki sojevi Enterococcus faecium koji nisu pokazali antibakterijsko djelovanje. Preostali sojevi (n=25) podvrgnuti su autolizi i daljnjem ispitivanju sigurnosti. Obrasci autolize varirali su ovisno o soju, a neke Lactococcus vrste pokazuju dobar autolitički potencijal. Procjene sigurnosti ukazale su na djelomičnu hemolizu kod nekih sojeva Enterococcus faecium, dok je analiza rezistencije na antibiotike pokazala veću rezistenciju kod Lactiplantibacillus plantarum i Leuconostoc mesenteroides, prvenstveno intrinzičnog podrijetla. Ova je studija identificirala višestruke sojeve Lactococcus lactis s obećavajućim tehnološkim i sigurnosnim profilom, što ukazuje na njihovu prikladnost kao učinkovite startere za proizvodnju Jben sira.</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>artisanal cheese</kwd>
        <kwd>lactic acid bacteria</kwd>
        <kwd>technological properties</kwd>
        <kwd>antibiotic resistance</kwd>
        <kwd>antimicrobial activity</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="hr">
        <kwd>tradicionalni sir</kwd>
        <kwd>bakterije mliječne kiseline</kwd>
        <kwd>tehnološka svojstva</kwd>
        <kwd>otpornost na antibiotike</kwd>
        <kwd>antimikrobno djelovanje</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="introduction">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Despite the widespread availability of industrial cheeses nowadays, the artisanal <italic>Jben</italic> cheese remains highly valued and commonly enjoyed by Moroccans. <italic>Jben</italic> is a soft, white cheese made from unpasteurised cow and/or goat milk, produced without any starter cultures. The milk is coagulated using commercial or vegetable rennet, specifically an aqueous extract of <italic>Cynara cardunculus</italic> flowers. The curd is drained for a few hours, and the resulting cheese is traditionally sold in braided palm-leaf moulds (El Galiou et al., 2015). However, the production of Moroccan <italic>Jben</italic> cheese faces several challenges, including a lack of standardization and the absence of regulatory requirements, leading to variations in quality and safety (El Galiou et al., 2015; Azzouz et al., 2024).</p>
      <p>To achieve a more consistent quality in <italic>Jben</italic> production, milk pasteurisation can be employed to eliminate undesirable and harmful microbiota. However, the cheeses made with pasteurised milk are tasteless and not as flavourful as those made with raw milk. An alternative approach is to incorporate native starter strains into <italic>Jben</italic> production, which can restore its distinctive flavour, prevent defects, and enhance its safety.</p>
      <p>The microorganisms used in cheesemaking include primary cultures, which drive both acidification and ripening, and adjunct cultures, which act only during the ripening process. In the case of artisanal, unripened cheeses, only starter cultures are used. The starter cultures belong principally to lactic acid bacteria (LAB), commonly <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Leuconostoc</italic>, and <italic>Streptococcus</italic>. Their major role is to utilise the glucose present in milk and produce lactic acid, resulting in milk acidification and curd formation. To date, the most common mesophilic strain used in cheesemaking is <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> (Cogan, 2014), which has also been identified as the predominant species among the bacterial populations in <italic>Jben</italic> cheese (Azzouz et al., 2024).</p>
      <p>The key technological criteria to consider when screening starter cultures include effective acidification (the ability to reduce milk pH below 5.3 within 6 hours at 30 °C) (Cachon et al., 2002) and proteolytic activity, indicated by halo diameters between 15 mm and 21 mm (Vuillemard et al., 1986). Additional desirable properties include the production of pleasant aromas, compatibility with co-starters, phage resistance, salt tolerance, and autolysis (Broome et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>In this study, the aim was to select native LAB from <italic>Jben</italic> cheese with promising technological and safety traits for potential use as starter cultures in Moroccan <italic>Jben</italic> production.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="material-and-methods">
      <title>Material and methods </title>
      <sec id="isolation-purification-and-pre-identification-of-lactic-acid-bacteria">
        <title>Isolation, purification and pre-identification of lactic acid bacteria</title>
        <p>Fifteen samples of artisanal <italic>Jben</italic> cheese were collected from various farms, weekly markets, and dairies in the city of Tangier and its surrounding areas (Dayedaate, Bni Harchen, Oued Ras). Cheeses were made from goat and/or cow raw milk without the use of starter cultures to ensure the isolation of indigenous bacteria. Ten grams from each sample were homogenised with 90 mL of sterile 0.9 % (w/v) physiological solution using a stomacher Lab-Blender 400 (Gemini BV, Overĳssel, Netherlands) for 3 minutes at a rattling speed of 3 times/sec. The stock solutions were serially diluted and evenly spread on MRS agar plates (Biokar, Beauvais, France) and M17 agar plates (Biokar, Beauvais, France). The plates were then incubated for 48 hours at 37 °C. Colonies were selected based on their size, colour, and shape, and were subcultured until they were purified. Isolated colonies were initially screened by Gram staining and catalase test. The isolates were conserved at -20 °C in 25 % (v/v) glycerol and MRS broth for subsequent analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="technological-characterization">
        <title>Technological characterization </title>
        <p>All isolated strains (n=89) were tested for acidifying and proteolytic activity; however, only those showing both traits were selected for additional testing.</p>
        <sec id="acidification">
          <title>Acidification </title>
          <p>Acidifying activity was evaluated using 100 mL of UHT whole milk with 1 % (v/v) of LAB precultures. The milk cultures were incubated at 37 °C and the evolution of pH (Jaouani et al., 2015) and acidity was monitored after 2, 6 and 24 hours (Jaouani et al., 2015). The pH was measured using a pH meter (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, Italy) and the lactic acid was titrated using 0.1 N NaOH (Labkem, Barcelona, Spain) (IDF, 1995).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="proteolysis">
          <title>Proteolysis</title>
          <p>The protocol of Fguiri et al. (2016) was used to assess the proteolytic activity, with some modifications. The assay was carried out using the well diffusion method where nutrient agar (Biokar, Beauvais, France) was supplemented with 10 % (w/v) skimmed milk (Nestlé, Barcelona, Spain). Fifty microliters of actively growing cells were then inoculated into the wells, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="gas-production-and-citrate-utilization">
          <title>Gas production and citrate utilization</title>
          <p>The gas production assay was performed according to Nikita and Develop (2012). Citrate utilization was assessed using the protocol established by Anagnostopoulos et al. (2018) using the <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium ATCC 14028 strain as a positive control.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="lipolysis">
          <title>Lipolysis</title>
          <p>The lipolytic activity was determined according to the protocol of Buffa et al. (2005) with some modifications. The test was carried by well diffusion method using cream fat agar (nutrient agar supplemented with 1 % (v/v) pasteurised milk cream, 38 % fat). Fifty microliters of strains from the exponential phase were then transferred into the wells, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C. The halos’ formation around the wells was measured and documented daily for three days.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="aroma-assessement">
          <title>Aroma assessement</title>
          <p>The production of pleasant aromas was assessed by inoculating 1 % of isolates from the lag phase into 100 mL of UHT whole milk. The cultures were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The flasks were manually shaken for a few seconds, and the aromas were perceived by smell using the "sniffing assay" (Garabal et al., 2008).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="diacetyl-acetoin-production">
          <title>Diacetyl-acetoin production </title>
          <p>The production of diacetyl-acetoin was screened according to Ribeiro et al. (2013) with a few modifications. Briefly, 0.5 mL of milk-grown strains were added to tubes along with 0.5 mL of 1 % (w/v) α-naphtol (Oxford Lab Fine Chem LLP, Maharashtra, India) and 0.5 mL of 16 % (w/v) KOH (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, USA). The mixture was further incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. The presence of diacetyl was confirmed by the appearance of a pink ring in the medium.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="antagonism-test">
          <title>Antagonism test</title>
          <p>The antibacterial activity was assessed by the well diffusion method against the following bacteria: <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> (ATCC19144), <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium (ATCC14028), <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (ATCC25922) and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (B1<italic>)</italic>. Suspensions of pathogenic bacteria (0.5 MacFarland) were spread over the surface of Muller-Hinton agar plates (Biokar, Beauvais, France). Afterwards, 50 μL of overnight grown LAB cultures were deposited on the wells. The inhibition halos around the wells were measured after 24 hours of incubation at 37 °C (Oldak et al., 2020).</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="molecular-identification">
        <title>Molecular identification</title>
        <sec id="dna-extraction-and-species-specific-pcr">
          <title>DNA extraction and species-specific PCR</title>
          <p>The extraction of genomic DNA was carried out according to Linares-Morales et al. (2020). <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strains were identified by species-specific PCR with the primers ddlE1 (Forward: 5’-ATC AAG TAC AGT TAG TCT-3’) and ddlE2 (Reverse: 5’-ACG ATT CAA AGC TAA CTG-3’), as described by Dutka-Malen et al. (1995). The reaction mix contained 5 μL of 5× buffer (Bioline, USA), 0.5 μM of primers (Biolegio, Nijmegen, Netherlands), 0.5 μL of Taq polymerase (Bioline, USA), 3 μL of DNA and 7.5 μL of milliQ water. The amplification conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles, which consisted of three steps: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min and an extension step at 72 °C for 1 min. The final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 10 min. The product size was determined using 1 % (w/v) agarose (Bioline, USA) gel, visualised under a Quantum-ST4-3020/WL/20M gel documentation system (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="s-rrna-partial-sequencing">
          <title>16S rRNA partial sequencing </title>
          <p>The remaining strains (other than <italic>E. faecalis</italic>) were identified through partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The primers used for the amplification of the V3 region were V3f (Forward: 5’- CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG -3’) and V3r (Reverse: 5’- ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG -3’) (Muyzer et al., 1993). The PCR reaction mix was composed of 5 μL of 5× buffer (Bioline, USA), 0.3 μM of primers (Biolegio, Nijmegen, Netherlands), 0.5 μL of Taq polymerase (Bioline, USA), 2 μL of DNA and 16 μL of milliQ water. The amplification conditions were those described by Lorbeg et al. (2014) but with an annealing temperature of 60 °C. PCR products were migrated for 30 min at 100 V in a 1 % (w/v) agarose gel. After the purification steps, the PCR products were sequenced by a 3130xl genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequences were searched in BLAST of the National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and aligned by the BioEdit software version 7.2.5 (Hall, 1999).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="autolytic-activity">
          <title>Autolytic activity </title>
          <p>After molecular identification, all <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strains were excluded, along with some <italic>E. faecium</italic> strains that did not display antibacterial activity. The remaining 25 isolates were subsequently evaluated for autolysis and safety.</p>
          <p>The autolysis percentage was determined according to Bahy El-Din et al. (2002) with minor modifications. <italic>Lactococcus</italic> and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> strains were revived in Tryptic-Soy Broth (Biokar, Beauvais, France), while <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> and <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> strains were cultured in MRS broth (Biokar, Beauvais, France). Cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 <italic>g</italic> for 5 min. Cell pellets were washed twice with (0.01 M, pH=5,5) potassium phosphate buffer (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, USA) and resuspended in potassium phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH=6) supplemented with 1 M NaCl. The optical density was adjusted between 0.6 and 0.8 at 650 nm. After the suspensions’ incubation at -20 °C for 24 h and then at 37 °C for another 24 h, the optical density was remeasured. The percentage of autolysis was calculated as follows (Boutrou et al., 1998):</p>
          <p>% A = <inline-formula><alternatives><tex-math><![CDATA[\frac{\left( A0 - \text{At} \right)*100}{A0}]]></tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">At</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula></p>
          <p>Where A<sub>0</sub> is the optical density at t<sub>0</sub> and A<sub>t</sub> is the optical density after incubation.</p>
          <p>The results were interpreted by genus following the instructions of Ayad et al. (2004).</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="safety-evaluation">
        <title>Safety evaluation</title>
        <sec id="haemolytic-activity-gelatinase-and-dnase-production">
          <title>Haemolytic activity, gelatinase and DNase production</title>
          <p>The haemolytic activity of the selected <italic>Enterococcus</italic> strains was investigated according to Pino et al. (2019). If clear or green zones appeared around the colonies, the haemolysis was interpreted as β-haemolysis or α- haemolysis, respectively. DNase and gelatinase production were evaluated according to the methods described by Lavilla-Lerma et al. (2013).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="antibiotic-resistance">
          <title>Antibiotic resistance</title>
          <p>The antibiotic susceptibility of the selected strains was tested by the disc diffusion method. In this study, nine different antibiotics were used: erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), lincomycin (15 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), penicillin (10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), and vancomycin (5 μg). All antibiotics were obtained from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK).</p>
          <p>For the analysis, 200 microliters of LAB precultures (1.5×10<sup>8</sup> cfu/mL) were spread on the surface of Muller-Hinton agar plates (Biokar, Beauvais, France). Antibiotic discs were placed aseptically with flamed forceps and the plates were incubated at 37 °C. After 24 hours of incubation, inhibition zones were interpreted according to the EUCAST (2021) and CLSI (2020) guidelines.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="detection-of-vancomycin-genes">
          <title>Detection of vancomycin genes</title>
          <p>DNA was extracted using a quick technique described by Espinosa et al. (2013) with slight modifications. Briefly, one colony from a 24 h culture was placed in a PCR tube containing 50 μL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCL, 1 mM EDTA). The tubes were then heated in a thermocycler at 100 °C for 5 min. The lysate was used directly for the PCR reaction.</p>
          <p>The amplification of <italic>vanA</italic> and <italic>vanB</italic> genes was conducted using the following primer pairs: A1 (Forward: 5'-GGGAAAACGACAATTGC-3') and A2 (Reverse: 5'-GTACAATGCGGCCGTTA-3'), resulting in a 732 bp product size for the <italic>vanA</italic> gene; and B1 (Forward: 5'-ATGGGAAGCCGATAGTC-3') and B2 (Reverse: 5'-GATTTCGTTCCTCGACC-3'),yielding a 635 bp product size for <italic>vanB</italic> gene (Dutka-Malen et al., 1995). The PCR reactions were performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 5 μL of buffer (Bioline, USA), 0.6 μM of primers (Biolegio, Nijmegen, Netherlands), 0.5 μL of dNTPs mix (Promega, Madison, USA), 0.5 μL of Taq polymerase (Bioline, USA) and 2 μL of DNA template. The PCR mixtures were subjected to the amplification conditions described by Asadpour and Ghazanfari (2019).</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="lyophilisation">
        <title>Lyophilisation </title>
        <p>The lyophilisation was performed according to Hammes and Vogel (1995) with modifications. The strains were twice revived in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h (Biokar, Beauvais, France), then centrifuged at 3,000 g for 20 minutes. The resulting pellets were washed twice and resuspended in 1 mL of 0.1 % (w/v) peptone buffered water (Biokar, Beauvais, France). The suspensions were transferred to the lyophilisation ampoules containing 9 mL of skimmed milk (Nestlé, Barcelona, Spain) at 11 % (w/v) or sucrose (Labkem, Barcelona, Spain) at 10 % (w/v). The strains were prefrozen below -40 °C for 4 hours in a lyophilisation machine (Biobase, Jinan, China) and then vacuum-dried for 24 h.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="statistics">
        <title>Statistics </title>
        <p>All analyses were performed in duplicate. Results were analysed using one-way ANOVA to evaluate statistical differences between means, employing Statgraphics 19 software (Statgraphics Technologies, Inc., 2020, The Plains, USA) with significance determined at p = 0.05.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="results-and-discussion">
      <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <sec id="technological-properties">
        <title>Technological properties</title>
        <sec id="acidifying-activity">
          <title>Acidifying activity</title>
          <p>The identification of LAB isolates by specific PCR and partial 16S rRNA sequencing is presented in Table 1. The acidifying activity of the different LAB groups after 6 and 24 hours of incubation is presented in Table 2A.</p>
          <p>In this study, 67.4 % of the isolates successfully reduced the milk's pH from 6.6 to 5.3 within 6 hours, and 71.9 % lowered the pH to below 4.8 after 24 h, meeting the criterion established by Cachon et al. (2002) for good acidifiers (Table 2B). Interestingly, despite being members of nonstarter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB), <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> strains exhibited the highest pH reductions (ΔpH 2.7-2.8) after 24 hours of incubation. In particular, the strains 18.1 and 18.6 achieved a ΔpH of 2.8, with Dornic acidity levels of 120.2 °D and 117.9 °D, respectively (Table 3). These values were comparable to those of <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> strains isolated from Serpa PDO cheese (Araújo-Rodrigues et al., 2021) and were significantly higher than the results reported by Fguiri et al. (2016). <italic>Enterococcus</italic> isolates also demonstrated good acidifying properties by lowering the pH below 4.8 after 24 hours (Table 2A), aligning with the findings of Albayrak and Duran (2021).</p>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 1. Isolates identification by specific PCR and partial 16S sequencing</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>
                    <bold>Species identification</bold>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <bold>Isolate code</bold>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <bold>Identity (%)</bold>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <bold>Accession number of closest relative</bold>
                  </th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>
                      <bold>Lc. lactis</bold>
                    </italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>5.12</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>7.10</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>8.2</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>8.10</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>9.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>12.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>12.11</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>12.12</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>13.2</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>13.3</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>13.4</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>13.8</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>14.3</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>15.4</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>15.7</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>16.3</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>17.6</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_040955.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>
                      <bold>Lb. plantarum</bold>
                    </italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>14.5</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_113338.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>14.6</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_113338.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>18.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_113338.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>18.6</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_113338.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <bold><italic>E</italic>. <italic>faecium</italic></bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>4.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_042054.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>4.2</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>4.3</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>4.4</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>7.12</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>10.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_042054.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>10.2</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>10.3</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>13.7</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>15.2</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>16.1</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_115764.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <bold><italic>L</italic>. <italic>mesenteroides </italic></bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>17.5</td>
                  <td>100</td>
                  <td>NR_113912.1</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <bold><italic>E</italic>. <italic>faecalis</italic> (n=34)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>Identified by species-specific PCR</td>
                  <td></td>
                  <td></td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 2. A. Acidifying activity of LAB strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>LAB groups</th>
                  <th>Number of isolates</th>
                  <th>Acidifying activity</th>
                  <th></th>
                  <th></th>
                  <th></th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>pH after 6 h</td>
                  <td>pH after 24 h</td>
                  <td></td>
                  <td></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>Mean</td>
                  <td>Range</td>
                  <td>Mean</td>
                  <td>Range</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecalis</italic>
                    </p>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecium</italic>
                    </p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>34</p>
                    <p>11</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>5.0±0.2</p>
                    <p>4.9±0.2</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>4.4-5.7</p>
                    <p>4.7-5.2</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>4.4±0.2</p>
                    <p>4.4±0.2</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>4.1-4.7</p>
                    <p>4.0-4.6</p>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>17</td>
                  <td>5.0±0.3</td>
                  <td>4.6-5.6</td>
                  <td>4.6±0.1</td>
                  <td>4.4-4.8</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>4</td>
                  <td>4.7±0.2</td>
                  <td>4.4-4.9</td>
                  <td>3.9±0.1</td>
                  <td>3.8-3.9</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Leuconostoc mesenteroides</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>6.0±0.0</td>
                  <td>6.0</td>
                  <td>5.2±0.0</td>
                  <td>5.2</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>The mean values presented in the table are calculated from two replicates for each sample.</italic>
          </p>
          <p>
            <italic>B. Percentage of isolated strains meeting desired thresholds in acidifying activity</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>Thresholds</th>
                  <th>Acidifying activity</th>
                  <th></th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>pH≤5.3 in 6 h</td>
                  <td>pH≤4.8 in 24 h</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Total isolates (n=89)</td>
                  <td>67.4 %</td>
                  <td>71.9 %</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 3. LAB strains isolated from Jben cheese exhibiting notable technological properties</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>
                    <italic>Strain</italic>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <p>pH</p>
                    <p>(after 6 h)</p>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <p>pH</p>
                    <p>(after 24 h)</p>
                  </th>
                  <th>LA production (°D) (after 24 h)</th>
                  <th>Proteolytic activity (mm)</th>
                  <th>Diacetyl production</th>
                  <th>Aroma production</th>
                  <th>Gas production</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> 18.1</td>
                  <td>4.4±0.0<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>3.8±0.0<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>120.2±1.9<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>16±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/butter</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> 18.6</td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>3.8±0.0<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>117.9±3.8<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>19.5±0.7<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> 14.5</td>
                  <td>4.9±0.0<sup>c</sup></td>
                  <td>3.9±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>111.6±3.8<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>18.5±0.7<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Sulphur</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> 14.6</td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>3.9±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>111.6±3.8<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>19.0±0.0<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Fermented milk</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>E. faecalis</italic> 12.2</td>
                  <td>4.4±0.0<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>4.1±0.0<sup>c</sup></td>
                  <td>72.0±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>11.5±0.7<sup>c</sup></td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>Yogurt</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>E. faecium</italic> 13.7</td>
                  <td>5.2±0.0<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>4.6±0.1<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>67.1±0.6<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>13.0±0.0<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Vanilla</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>E. faecium</italic> 15.2</td>
                  <td>5.1±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>4.6±0.0<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>63.5±0.6<sup>cd</sup></td>
                  <td>16.0±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>E. faecium</italic> 16.1</td>
                  <td>5.2±0.0<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>4.6±0.0<sup>f</sup></td>
                  <td>59.4±2.5<sup>bc</sup></td>
                  <td>15.0±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Vanilla</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lc. lactis</italic> 12.1</td>
                  <td>5.0±0.0<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>57.6±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>11.0±1.4<sup>bc</sup></td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Vanilla</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lc. lactis</italic> 5.12</td>
                  <td>5.1±0.0<sup>e</sup></td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>60.7±0.6<sup>bc</sup></td>
                  <td>11.5±0.0<sup>c</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Vanilla</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lc. lactis</italic> 16.3</td>
                  <td>4.9±0.0<sup>c</sup></td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>56.7±1.3<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>12.0±0.0<sup>cd</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lc. lactis</italic> 12.11</td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
                  <td>4.5±0.0<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>67.1±0.6<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>13.0±0.0<sup>d</sup></td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>Yogurt</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Lc. lactis</italic> 14.3</td>
                  <td>5.6±0.0<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>4.7±0.0<sup>g</sup></td>
                  <td>59.8±0.6<sup>bc</sup></td>
                  <td>10.0±0.0<sup>ab</sup></td>
                  <td>+</td>
                  <td>Yogurt/Butter</td>
                  <td>No</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5</td>
                  <td>6.0±0.0<sup>h</sup></td>
                  <td>5.2±0.0<sup>h</sup></td>
                  <td>45.5±0.6<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>9.5±0.7<sup>a</sup></td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>Cooked milk</td>
                  <td>Yes</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Significant differences (p&lt;0.05) were observed among strains for pH at 6 hours, pH at 24 hours, lactic acid production at 24 hours, and proteolytic activity. Means with different superscripts in the same column indicate significant difference. LA= Lactic acid; -= no production; +=low production; ++ =moderate production; +++=high production; ++++ =very high production</italic>
          </p>
          <p>The acidifying ability of the strains was also categorized based on pH reduction units after 6 hours of incubation resulting in four groups: "fast acid producers," which lowered the pH by more than 2 units; "medium acid producers," showing a decrease of 1.5 to 1.9 pH units; and "slow acid producers", resulting in a pH decline of 1 to 1.4 pH units. The largest group was that of "medium acid producers" comprising 52.8 % of the strains, and the smallest group was that of "fast acid producers" with 4.5 % of the strains. Regarding <italic>Lactococcus</italic> species, only 5.9 % of the isolates were classified as fast acidifiers, while 58.8 % were categorized as medium acidifiers. However, it is noteworthy that all <italic>Lactococcu</italic>s strains, including the slow acidifiers, were capable of producing curd after 24 hours of incubation. The unique <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5 strain, however, was classified as a slow acid producer and failed to produce a coagulum from whole milk, which is consistent with the results of Zarour et al. (2018).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="proteolytic-activity">
          <title>Proteolytic activity </title>
          <p>Proteolysis enhances both the flavor and texture of cheese, with LAB - particularly NSLAB - being the primary organisms responsible for this activity (Hutkins, 2006). In our study, all strains with acidifying properties also exhibited proteolytic activity (Table 4A). According to Vuillemard et al. (1986), strains are considered suitable for cheesemaking if they produce proteolysis halos of 15-21 mm. In this study, 6.74 % of the isolates demonstrated proteolytic activity within this range (Table 4B), with <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> isolates showing the largest proteolytic halos, surpassing those of other genera. Regarding <italic>Enterococcus</italic> isolates, most demonstrated low to moderate proteolytic activity, in line with the findings of Pisano et al. (2019). Similarly, the <italic>Lactococcus</italic> genus was classified as moderately proteolytic, while the <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> genus exhibited weak proteolytic activity, consistent with the results of Zarour et al. (2018).</p>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 4. A. Proteolytic activity of LAB strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>LAB groups</th>
                  <th>Number of isolates</th>
                  <th>Proteolytic (mm)</th>
                  <th></th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td></td>
                  <td></td>
                  <td>Mean</td>
                  <td>Range</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecalis</italic>
                    </p>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecium</italic>
                    </p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>34</p>
                    <p>11</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>10.3±0.9</p>
                    <p>12±1.9</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>8.0-13.0</p>
                    <p>10.0-16.0</p>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>17</td>
                  <td>11.6±1.0</td>
                  <td>10.0-13.0</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>4</td>
                  <td>18.3±1.6</td>
                  <td>16.0-19.5</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Leuconostoc mesenteroides</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>9.5±0.7</td>
                  <td>9.5</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>The mean values presented in the table are calculated from two replicates for each sample.</italic>
          </p>
          <p>
            <italic>B. Percentage of isolated strains meeting desired thresholds in proteolytic activity</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th></th>
                  <th>Proteolytic activity</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>Threshold</td>
                  <td>15 mm &lt; H* &lt; 21 mm</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Total isolates (n=89)</td>
                  <td>6.74%</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>*Halo</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="lipolytic-activity">
          <title>Lipolytic activity</title>
          <p>Lactic acid bacteria are generally considered to be weakly lipolytic. However, they can release small amounts of fatty acids in cheeses during extended ripening. Indeed, several lipases/esterases originating from strains of <italic>Lactococcus</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> have been isolated and characterised (McSweeney, 2011). In the present study, none of the isolates exhibited lipolytic activity, consistent with findings by Câmara et al. (2019) and Yerlikaya (2019), who observed no lipolysis haloes in species from the <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, and <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> genera when incubated in tributyrin agar.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="citrate-utilization">
          <title>Citrate utilization </title>
          <p>Present in milk at low concentrations, citrate is metabolised by limited LAB species, primarily belonging to the genera <italic>Leuconostoc</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>. This metabolic process not only yields CO<sub>2</sub>, crucial for the formation of holes in certain cheeses, but also produces diacetyl and acetate, essential aromatic compounds found in soft cheeses and fermented milks (Parente et al., 2017). However, in the present study, none of the strains was able to use citrate, which is consistent with the results obtained by Anagnostopoulos et al. (2018).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="gas-production">
          <title>Gas production</title>
          <p>Based on the gas production assay, all strains were homofermentative except for <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5, which produced gas bubbles after incubation (Table 3). This observation aligns with established knowledge, as genera known for heterofermentative activity include Leuconostocs, Oenococci, Weissellas, and certain Lactobacilli (Axelsson, 2004).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="production-of-diacetyl-acetoin">
          <title>Production of diacetyl-acetoin</title>
          <p>Diacetyl is one of the most important volatile compounds found in cheese (Broadbent et al., 2011). Beyond its sensory attributes, diacetyl is also recognized for its antimicrobial properties against yeasts, Gram-negative, and Gram-positive bacteria (Molloy et al., 2011). In this study, all <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> strains and the majority of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>faecalis</italic> (91.2 %) and <italic>E</italic>. <italic>faecium</italic> (90.9 %) isolates exhibited diacetyl production. This finding aligns with previous studies indicating that <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species are the primary diacetyl producers among lactic acid bacteria (Domingos-Lopes et al., 2017). Certain species of the genus <italic>Leuconostoc</italic>, such as <italic>Ln</italic>. <italic>mesenteroides</italic> subsp. <italic>cremoris</italic> and <italic>Lc</italic>. <italic>lactis</italic> cit+, are also known diacetyl producers (Marsili, 2011). However, our analysis of the isolate <italic>Ln</italic>. <italic>mesenteroides</italic> 17.5 (Table 3) revealed no diacetyl production, corroborating the findings of Saidi et al. (2020). Regarding the <italic>Lactococcus</italic> isolates, diacetyl production was observed in 47.1 % of strains. Although this percentage is lower compared to the <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> isolates, in this study, it is still higher than that reported by Perin et al. (2017), who observed diacetyl production in only one out of 23 <italic>Lactococcus</italic> strains.</p>
          <p>Notably, although citric acid is a well-established precursor of diacetyl, our isolates were found to produce it through alternative metabolic pathways, as none could use citrate as their only carbon source. These findings are consistent with those reported by Saidi et al. (2020). These pathways likely involve pyruvate derived from sugar metabolism or the acetaldehyde route, bypassing direct citrate utilization (Escamilla-Hurtado et al., 1996).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="aroma-production">
          <title>Aroma production </title>
          <p>Before using lactic acid bacteria as starters or additives in cheese, their ability to produce pleasant flavours must be evaluated. In this study, 62.7 % of the isolates have been found to emit pleasing aromas, mostly reminiscent of the fresh smell of yoghurt and butter (Tables 3, 5 and 6). The majority of <italic>E. faecalis</italic> and <italic>E. faecium</italic> strains produced pleasant flavours, consistent with previous reports on the ability of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> strains to produce flavouring compounds in milk (Câmara et al., 2019). In the <italic>Lactococcus</italic> group, over half of the strains (52.9 %) produced sulphur aromas, a prevalent trait among <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> strains, as confirmed by the findings of Garabal et al. (2008). The 47.1 % remaining <italic>Lactococcus</italic> isolates produced a discernible yoghurt aroma. Interestingly, a noticeable yoghurt-vanilla flavour was detected in two <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> distinct strains: 5.12 and 12.1 (Table 3). The <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5 strain produced a cooked milk flavor (Table 3), a characteristic previously observed in nearly half of the <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> isolates reported by Garabal et al. (2008). This result may be due to the weak acidifying and proteolytic activities of <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> species, which likely limit their ability to produce desirable aromas.</p>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 5. Aroma production by LAB strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>LAB groups</th>
                  <th>Fermented milk</th>
                  <th>Yoghurt</th>
                  <th>
                    <p>Yoghurt/</p>
                    <p>butter</p>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <p>Yoghurt</p>
                    <p>/vanilla</p>
                  </th>
                  <th>
                    <p>Yoghurt/</p>
                    <p>sulphur</p>
                  </th>
                  <th>Sulphur</th>
                  <th>Cooked milk</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecalis</italic>
                    </p>
                    <p>
                      <italic>E. faecium</italic>
                    </p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>-*</p>
                    <p>-</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>22</p>
                    <p>4</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>2</p>
                    <p>1</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>-</p>
                    <p>2</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>3</p>
                    <p>1</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>7</p>
                    <p>3</p>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <p>-</p>
                    <p>-</p>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>5</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>2</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>8</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic>
                  </td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>-</td>
                  <td>1</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>*Indicates that no strain produced this aroma</italic>
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="antibacterial-activity">
          <title>Antibacterial activity </title>
          <p>The assessment of the antibacterial activity against four different pathogens - <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (ATCC19144), <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium (ATCC14028), <italic>E. coli</italic> (ATCC25922), and <italic>Staph. aureus</italic> (B1) -revealed significant differences (p&lt;0.05). Lactic acid bacteria produce various bioactive compounds with antimicrobial properties, including lactic acid, diacetyl, ethanol, fatty acids, and bacteriocins such as nisin (Molloy et al., 2011). In our study, noteworthy percentages of <italic>E. faecalis</italic> (70.6 %) and <italic>E. faecium</italic> (27.2 %) strains inhibited the growth of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (ATCC19144) (Figure 1), aligning with the findings reported by Albayrak and Duran (2021). Among these, <italic>E. faecium</italic> 15.2 showed the largest inhibition zone diameter of 15 mm, followed closely by <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strains 9.3 and 1.13, which both exhibited diameters of 14 mm (Figure 1). However, isolates from <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, and <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> genera showed no antibacterial activity.</p>
          <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
          <p>
            <italic>Figure 1. The antibacterial activity of Enterococcus strains against L. monocytogenes (ATCC19144). Means with different superscripts differ significantly (p&lt;0.05)</italic>
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="distribution-of-lab-strains-with-technological-properties-in-jben-cheese">
        <title>Distribution of LAB strains with technological properties in Jben cheese</title>
        <p>In this study, among the strains found to possess technological properties (75.3 %), the largest isolated group was <italic>Enterococcus</italic> (67.2 %), including <italic>E. faecalis</italic> (50.7 %) and <italic>E. faecium</italic> (16.4 %) isolates (Table 6). <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> strains came in second with a percentage of 25.4 %. <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> strains made up 6 % and 1.5 % of all isolates, respectively.</p>
        <p>
          <italic>Table 6. Prevalence of technologically active LAB strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese and their distribution in some technological properties</italic>
        </p>
        <table-wrap>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Species</th>
                <th>
                  <p>Strain</p>
                  <p>prevalence</p>
                </th>
                <th>Pleasant aroma production</th>
                <th>Diacetyl-acetoin production</th>
                <th>
                  <p>Antilisterial</p>
                  <p>activity</p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lc. lactis</italic>
                </td>
                <td>25.4 %</td>
                <td>47.1 %</td>
                <td>47.1 %</td>
                <td>0 %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>6 %</td>
                <td>75.0 %</td>
                <td>100 %</td>
                <td>0 %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E. faecalis</italic>
                </td>
                <td>50.7 %</td>
                <td>70.6 %</td>
                <td>91.2 %</td>
                <td>70.6 %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E. faecium</italic>
                </td>
                <td>16.4 %</td>
                <td>63.6 %</td>
                <td>90.9 %</td>
                <td>27.2 %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.5 %</td>
                <td>0 %</td>
                <td>0 %</td>
                <td>0 %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total isolates (n=67)</td>
                <td>100 %</td>
                <td>62.7 %</td>
                <td>79.1 %</td>
                <td>50.6 %</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="autolysis">
        <title>Autolysis </title>
        <p>The autolysis test was exclusively conducted on candidate strains (n=25). Autolysis is the breakdown of bacterial cell walls by peptidoglycan hydrolases. This process enables the release of intracellular ripening enzymes that control the cheese's bitterness and proteolysis (Broome et al., 2011). In this study, the autolysis rates ranged from 6.3 % to 69.4 % (p=0.0000) (Figure 2) with most <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> strains exhibiting high levels of autolysis. Notably, the autolysis percentages of eight <italic>Lactococcus</italic> strains ranged from 39.4% to 53.7%, exceeding the levels established by Ayad et al. (2004). According to the classification proposed by Ayad et al. (2004), our <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> strains showed moderate autolytic percentages (41.7 %-69.4 %). Nevertheless, they were greater than those reported by Nieto-Arribas et al. (2009). Similarly, the <italic>Enterococcus</italic> strains demonstrated moderate autolysis (25.8-28.2 %), contrasting with the findings of Jaouani et al. (2015), who reported higher autolytic rates in <italic>E. faecium</italic> strains. Notably, the <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5 strain exhibited higher autolytic activity (60.9%) compared to the rates reported by Seixas et al. (2018).</p>
        <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image2.jpeg"/>
        <p>
          <italic>Figure 2. The autolytic activity of selected lactic acid bacteria. Means with different superscripts differ significantly (p&lt;0.05)</italic>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="safety-assessment">
        <title>Safety assessment </title>
        <sec id="screening-of-haemolysis-gelatinase-dnase-activity">
          <title>Screening of haemolysis, gelatinase, DNAse activity </title>
          <p>In this study, four virulence determinants - haemolysis, gelatinase activity, DNase activity, and antibiotic resistance - were evaluated in <italic>E. faecium</italic> strains (Table 7). None of the isolates showed β-haemolysis, gelatinase or DNase activity. However, the strains 15.2 and 13.7 showed partial haemolysis (α- haemolysis) and were then excluded from the collection.</p>
          <p>
            <italic>Table 7. Safety aspects of selected E. faecium strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese</italic>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>Criteria</th>
                  <th><italic>E. faecium</italic> 16.1</th>
                  <th><italic>E. faecium</italic> 13.7</th>
                  <th><italic>E. faecium</italic> 15.2</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>Haemolysis</td>
                  <td>No haemolysis</td>
                  <td>Partial haemolysis</td>
                  <td>Partial haemolysis</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Gelatinase</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>DNase</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><italic>vanA</italic> and <italic>vanB</italic> genes</td>
                  <td>Absence</td>
                  <td>ND*</td>
                  <td>ND*</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>*ND - not determined</italic>
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="antibiotic-resistance-1">
        <title>Antibiotic resistance</title>
        <p>All of the <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> strains isolated in this study demonstrated susceptibility to the tested antibiotics, with the exception of two <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> isolates, which exhibited resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Table 8). <italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic> strains showed susceptibility to all antibiotics except erythromycin, for which they displayed intermediate susceptibility, in line with previous research (Nasiri and Hanifian, 2022). Furthermore, the selected <italic>E. faecium</italic> strain 16.1, chosen based on its technological activity and absence of virulence traits, was tested for the presence of <italic>vanA</italic> and <italic>vanB</italic> genes and was found to be negative for both. The <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic> isolates demonstrated resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin, norfloxacin, and tetracycline. This genus is known for its intrinsic resistance to teicoplanin, vancomycin, and norfloxacin (Liong et al., 2009). In contrast, resistance to tetracycline appears to be acquired, although it is frequently observed in <italic>L. plantarum</italic> strains isolated from dairy products (Kamarinou et al., 2022). The <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> 17.5, in turn, exhibited a high level of resistance among the isolated strains, demonstrating resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin, norfloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. While <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> species possess intrinsic and non-transferable resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin (Dicks et al., 2011), the resistance to fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is likely acquired but is relatively common among <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic> strains (Zarour and Benmechernene, 2012).</p>
        <p>
          <italic>Table 8. Antibiotic resistance profile of selected LAB strains isolated from Moroccan Jben cheese</italic>
        </p>
        <table-wrap>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>LAB groups</th>
                <th>TEC</th>
                <th>VAN</th>
                <th>TET</th>
                <th>NOR</th>
                <th>GEN</th>
                <th>L</th>
                <th>SXT</th>
                <th>PEN</th>
                <th>ERY</th>
                <th>Number of isolates</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E. faecium</italic>
                </td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(3)S</td>
                <td>(2)I</td>
                <td>3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lc. lactis</italic>
                </td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(2)R</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>(17)S</td>
                <td>17</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lb. plantarum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>(4)R</td>
                <td>(4)R</td>
                <td>(4)R</td>
                <td>(4)R</td>
                <td>4(S)</td>
                <td>4(S)</td>
                <td>4(S)</td>
                <td>4(S)</td>
                <td>4(S)</td>
                <td>4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Ln. mesenteroides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>(1)R</td>
                <td>(1)R</td>
                <td>(1)S</td>
                <td>(1)R</td>
                <td>(1)S</td>
                <td>(1)S</td>
                <td>(1)R</td>
                <td>(1)S</td>
                <td>(1)S</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>
          <italic>S = Susceptible; R = Resistant; I = Intermediate; TEC = teicoplanin, VAN = vancomycin, TET = tetracycline, NOR = norfloxacin, GEN = gentamicin, L = lincomycin, SXT = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, PEN = penicillin, ERY = erythromycin.</italic>
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="conclusion">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The characterization of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from artisanal Moroccan cheese has provided valuable insights into their technological properties, diversity, and safety aspects. It was determined that <italic>Jben</italic> cheese boasts a rich diversity of lactic acid bacteria, including <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, and <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> species, all of which possess important technological properties. However, the study also uncovered a significant level of resistance among the <italic>Ln</italic>. <italic>mesenteroides</italic> and <italic>Lb</italic>. <italic>plantarum</italic> strains, with a notable proportion being of intrinsic origin.</p>
      <p>Most importantly, this study identified multiple strains of <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> with promising technological and safety profile, suggesting their suitability as effective starters for <italic>Jben</italic> cheese production. Future research should focus on conducting in-depth investigations into the virulence traits of these strains, as well as evaluating their practical applications and long-term performance in cheese production.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="funding">
      <title>Funding </title>
      <p>This work was supported by the Academy Hassan II of Sciences and Techniques.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Albayrak, Ç.B., Duran, M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2021</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Isolation and characterization of aroma producing lactic acid bacteria from artisanal white cheese for multifunctional properties.</article-title>
          <source>LWT</source>
          <volume>150</volume>
          <fpage>112053</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2021.112053</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Anagnostopoulos, D.A., Bozoudi, D., Tsaltas, D.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Enterococci isolated from Cypriot green table olives as a new source of technological and probiotic properties.</article-title>
          <source>Fermentation</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3390/FERMENTATION4020048</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Araújo-Rodrigues, H., dos Santos, M.T.P.G., Ruiz-Moyano, S., Tavaria, F.K., Martins, A.P.L., Alvarenga, N., Pintado, M.E.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2021</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Technological and protective performance of LAB isolated from Serpa PDO cheese: Towards selection and development of an autochthonous starter culture.</article-title>
          <source>LWT</source>
          <volume>150</volume>
          <fpage>112079</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2021.112079</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Asadpour, L., Ghazanfari, N.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Detection of vancomycin nonsusceptible strains in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in northern Iran.</article-title>
          <source>International Microbiology</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>411</fpage>
          <lpage>417</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1007/S10123-019-00063-7/METRICS</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Axelsson, L.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Lactic acid bacteria: Classification and physiology,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Salminen, S., von Wright, A., Ouwehand, A., (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Marcel Dekker,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, USA,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>66</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1201/b11503</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Ayad, E.H.E., Nashat, S., El-Sadek, N., Metwaly, H., El-Soda, M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Selection of wild lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Egyptian dairy products according to production and technological criteria.</article-title>
          <source>Food Microbiology</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>715</fpage>
          <lpage>725</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.009</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>7.Azzouz, S., Ahadaf, S., Zantar, S., El Galiou, O., Arakrak, A., Bakkali, M., Laglaoui, A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2024</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Analysis of the bacterial diversity in Moroccan Jben cheese using TTGE, DGGE, and 16S rRNA sequencing.</article-title>
          <source>World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology</source>
          <volume>40</volume>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-03964-6</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Bahy El-Din, B., El-Soda, M., Ezzat, N.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Proteolytic, lipolytic and autolytic activities of enterococci strains isolated from Egyptian dairy products.</article-title>
          <source>Le Lait</source>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>289</fpage>
          <lpage>304</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2002011</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Broadbent, J.R., Budinich, M.F., Steele, J.L.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Fuquay, J.W.P.L., McSweeney, H., Fox, P.F., Donnelly, C.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>639</fpage>
          <lpage>644</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00067-4</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Boutrou, R., Sepulchre, A., Gripon, J.C., Monnet, V.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Simple tests for predicting the lytic behavior and proteolytic activity of lactococcal strains in cheese.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
          <volume>81</volume>
          <issue>9</issue>
          <fpage>2321</fpage>
          <lpage>2328</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)70121-3</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <publisher-loc>Broome, M.C., Powell, I.B., Limsowtin, G.K.Y.</publisher-loc>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Cheese: Starter Cultures: Specific Properties,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Fuquay, J.W.P.L., McSweeney, H., Fox, P.F., Donnelly, C.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>559</fpage>
          <lpage>566</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00067-4</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Buffa, M., Morais, J., Jimenez-Belenguer, A., Hernandez-Gimenez, E., Guamis, B.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2005</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw ewes’ milk for cheese making.</article-title>
          <source>Milchwissenschaft</source>
          <volume>61</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>404</fpage>
          <lpage>407</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Cachon, R., Jeanson, S., Aldarf, M., Divies, C.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Characterization of lactic acid starters based on acidification and reduction activities.</article-title>
          <source>Le Lait</source>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <fpage>281</fpage>
          <lpage>288</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2002010</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Câmara, S.P., Dapkevicius, A., Riquelme, C., Elias, R.B., Silva, C.C.G., Malcata, F.X., Dapkevicius, M.L.N.E.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Potential of lactic acid bacteria from Pico cheese for starter culture development.</article-title>
          <source>Food Science and Technology International</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>303</fpage>
          <lpage>317</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013218823129</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Cogan, T.M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Starter cultures employed in Cheesemaking,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology.</source>
          <publisher-loc>Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L.</publisher-loc>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>(Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Academic Press,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>508</fpage>
          <lpage>514</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00322-0</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Dicks, L.M., Todorov, S.D., Franco, B.D.G.M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <source>Current status of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria, In: Antibiotic resistance: causes and risk factors, mechanisms and alternatives.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Bonilla AR, Muniz KP (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Nova Science Publishers,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, USA,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>379</fpage>
          <lpage>424</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Domingos-Lopes, M.F.P., Stanton, C., Ross, P.R., Dapkevicius, M.L.E., Silva, C.C.G.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Genetic diversity, safety and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese.</article-title>
          <source>Food Microbiology</source>
          <volume>63</volume>
          <fpage>178</fpage>
          <lpage>190</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FM.2016.11.014</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Dutka-Malen, S., Evers, S., Courvalin, P.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
          <volume>33</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>24</fpage>
          <lpage>27</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.33.1.24-27.1995</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>El Galiou, O., Zantar, S., Bakkali, M., Laglaoui, A., Centeno, J. A., Carballo, J.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Chemical and microbiological characteristics of traditional homemade fresh goat cheeses from Northern Morocco.</article-title>
          <source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
          <volume>129</volume>
          <fpage>108</fpage>
          <lpage>113</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SMALLRUMRES.2015.06.005</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Escamilla-Hurtado, M.L., Tomasini-Campocosio A., Valdés-Martínez S., Soriano-Santos, J.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1996</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Diacetyl formation by lactic bacteria.</article-title>
          <source>Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia</source>
          <volume>38</volume>
          <fpage>129</fpage>
          <lpage>37</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Espinosa, I., Baez, M., Marrero, S.M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Evaluation of simplified DNA extraction methods for Streptococcus suis typing.</article-title>
          <source>Revista de Salud Animal</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          <lpage>63</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Fguiri, I., Ziadi, M., Atigui, M., Ayeb, N., Arroum, S., Assadi, M., Khorchani, T.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Isolation and characterisation of lactic acid bacteria strains from raw camel milk for potential use in the production of fermented Tunisian dairy products.</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Dairy Technology</source>
          <volume>69</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          <lpage>113</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12226</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Garabal, J.I., Rodríguez-Alonso, P., Centeno, J.A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cows’ milk cheeses currently produced in Galicia (NW Spain).</article-title>
          <source>LWT - Food Science and Technology</source>
          <volume>41</volume>
          <issue>8</issue>
          <fpage>1452</fpage>
          <lpage>1458</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2007.09.004</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Hall, T.A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1999</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT.</article-title>
          <source>Nucleic Acids Symposium Series</source>
          <volume>41</volume>
          <fpage>9598</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Hammes, W.P., Vogel, R.F.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>The genus Lactobacillus,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Wood BJB</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Holzapfel WH (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Blackie Academic &amp; Professional,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          <lpage>54</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5817-0_3</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Hutkins, R.W.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Cheese.</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Microbiology and technology of fermented foods</source>
          <publisher-loc>Blackwell publishing, Ames, USA,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>145</fpage>
          <lpage>206</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470277515</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>IDF</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <source>IDF guideline-determination of acidifying activity of dairy cultures.</source>
          <comment>Bulletin IDF 306,</comment>
          <publisher-name>International Dairy Federation,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Brussels, Belgium,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>34</fpage>
          <lpage>36</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r28">
        <label>28</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Jaouani, I., Abbassi, M.S., Ribeiro, S.C., Khemiri, M., Mansouri, R., Messadi, L., Silva, C.C.G.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Safety and technological properties of bacteriocinogenic enterococci isolates from Tunisia.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Applied Microbiology</source>
          <volume>119</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>1089</fpage>
          <lpage>1100</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1111/JAM.12916</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r29">
        <label>29</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Kamarinou, C.S., Papadopoulou, O.S., Doulgeraki, A.I., Tassou, C.C., Galanis, A., Chorianopoulos, N.G., Argyri, A.A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2022</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Mapping the key technological and functional characteristics of indigenous lactic acid bacteria isolated from Greek traditional dairy products.</article-title>
          <source>Microorganisms</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>246</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS10020246/S1</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r30">
        <label>30</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Lavilla-Lerma, L., Pérez-Pulido, R., Martínez-Bueno, M., Maqueda, M., Valdivia, E.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Characterization of functional, safety, and gut survival related characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from farmhouse goat’s milk cheeses.</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology</source>
          <volume>16323</volume>
          <fpage>136</fpage>
          <lpage>145</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFOODMICRO.2013.02.015</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r31">
        <label>31</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2020</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Selection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fresh fruits and vegetables based on their antimicrobial and enzymatic activities.</article-title>
          <source>Foods</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          <issue>10</issue>
          <fpage>1399</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101399</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r32">
        <label>32</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Liong, M.T., Yeo, S.K., Kuan, C.Y., Fung, W.Y., Ewe, J.A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>Antibiotic resistance and probiotics: roles, mechanisms and evidence. In: Antibiotic resistance: causes and risk factors, mechanisms and alternatives.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Bonilla, A.R., Muniz, K.P. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Nova Science Publishers,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, USA,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          <lpage>38</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r33">
        <label>33</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Lorbeg, P., Majhenič, A. A. Č., Rogelj, I.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Evaluation of different primers for PCR-DGGE analysis of cheese-associated enterococci.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Dairy Research</source>
          <volume>76</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>265</fpage>
          <lpage>271</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029909003902</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r34">
        <label>34</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Marsili, R.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Flavors and off-flavors in dairy foods,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Fuquay, J.W.P.L., McSweeney, H., Fox, P.F., Donnelly, C.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>533</fpage>
          <lpage>551</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00049-2</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r35">
        <label>35</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>McSweeney, P.L.H.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Fuquay, J.W.P.L., McSweeney, H., Fox, P.F., Donnelly, C.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>667</fpage>
          <lpage>674</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00049-2</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r36">
        <label>36</label>
        <mixed-citation>
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Molloy, E.M., Hill, C., Cotter, P.D., Ross, R.P.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <source>In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences.</source>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>Fuquay, J.W.P.L., McSweeney, H., Fox, P.F., Donnelly, C.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>420</fpage>
          <lpage>429</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00049-2</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r37">
        <label>37</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Muyzer, G., De Waal, E.C., Uitterlinden, A.G.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1993</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA.</article-title>
          <source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</source>
          <volume>59</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>695</fpage>
          <lpage>700</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.59.3.695-700.1993</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r38">
        <label>38</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>38.Nasiri, M., Hanifian, S.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2022</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in pasteurized milk: Prevalence, genotyping, and characterization of virulence traits.</article-title>
          <source>LWT</source>
          <volume>153</volume>
          <fpage>112452</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112452</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r39">
        <label>39</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="web">
          <source>National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)[Internet].</source>
          <publisher-loc>Bethesda</publisher-loc>
          <comment>(MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information; [1988] - [cited 2024 November 18]. Available from:</comment>
          <ext-link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r40">
        <label>40</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Nieto-Arribas, P., Poveda, J.M., Seseña, S., Palop, L., Cabezas, L.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Technological characterization of Lactobacillus isolates from traditional Manchego cheese for potential use as adjunct starter cultures.</article-title>
          <source>Food Control</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          <issue>12</issue>
          <fpage>1092</fpage>
          <lpage>1098</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org.10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.03.001</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r41">
        <label>41</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Nikita, C., Develop, D.H.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2012</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Isolation, identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from dairy sludge sample.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Environmental Research and Development</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>234</fpage>
          <lpage>244</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r42">
        <label>42</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Oldak, A., Zielińska, D., Łepecka, A., Długosz, E., Kołożyn-Krajewska, D.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2020</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Lactobacillus plantarum Strains isolated from Polish regional cheeses exhibit anti-staphylococcal activity and selected probiotic properties.</article-title>
          <source>Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>1025</fpage>
          <lpage>1038</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1007/S12602-019-09587-W</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r43">
        <label>43</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Parente, E., Cogan, T.M., Powell, I.B.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Starter cultures: general aspects,</chapter-title>
          <source>In: Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology: General Aspects.</source>
          <publisher-loc>Cotter, P.D., Everett,</publisher-loc>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <string-name>D.W. (Ed.),</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Academic Press,</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>London, UK,</publisher-loc>
          <fpage>201</fpage>
          <lpage>220</lpage>
          <ext-link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417012-4.00001-6</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r44">
        <label>44</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Perin, L., Belviso, S., Bello, B.D., Nero, L.A., Cocolin, L.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Technological properties and biogenic amines production by bacteriocinogenic lactococci and enterococci strains isolated from raw goat’s milk.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Food Protection</source>
          <volume>80</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>151</fpage>
          <lpage>157</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-16-267</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r45">
        <label>45</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Pino, A., Russo, N., Van Hoorde, K., De Angelis, M., Sferrazzo, G., Randazzo, C.L., Caggia, C.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Piacentinu Ennese PDO Cheese as reservoir of promising probiotic bacteria.</article-title>
          <source>Microorganisms</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          <issue>8</issue>
          <fpage>254</fpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080254</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r46">
        <label>46</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Pisano, M.B., Deplano, M., Fadda, M.E., Cosentino, S.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Microbiota of Sardinian goat’s milk and preliminary characterization of prevalent LAB species for starter or adjunct cultures development.</article-title>
          <source>BioMed Research International</source>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6131404</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r47">
        <label>47</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Ribeiro, S.C., Coelho, M.C., Todorov, S.D., Franco, B.D.G.M., Dapkevicius, M.L.E., Silva, C.C.G.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Technological properties of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from Pico cheese an artisanal cow’s milk cheese.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Applied Microbiology</source>
          <volume>116</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>573</fpage>
          <lpage>585</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12388</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r48">
        <label>48</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Saidi, Y., del Rio, B., Senouci, D.E., Redruello, B., Martinez, B., Ladero, V., Kihal, M., Alvarez, M.A.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2020</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Polyphasic characterisation of non-starter lactic acid bacteria from Algerian raw camel’s milk and their technological aptitudes.</article-title>
          <source>Food Technology and Biotechnology</source>
          <volume>58</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>260</fpage>
          <lpage>272</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.58.03.20.6598</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r49">
        <label>49</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Seixas, F.N., Rios, E.A., Martinez de Oliveira, A.L., Beloti, V., Poveda, J.M.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Selection of Leuconostoc strains isolated from artisanal Serrano Catarinense cheese for use as adjuncts in cheese manufacture.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture</source>
          <volume>98</volume>
          <issue>10</issue>
          <fpage>3899</fpage>
          <lpage>3906</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1002/JSFA.8907</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r50">
        <label>50</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="chapter">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Statgraphics</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2020</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>: Statgraphics Technologies,</chapter-title>
          <source>Inc. 2020</source>
          <publisher-loc>(The Plains, USA).</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r51">
        <label>51</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Vuillemard, J.C., Amiot, J., Gauthier, S.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>1986</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Evaluation de l’activité protéolytique de bactéries lactiques par une méthode de diffusion sur plaque.</article-title>
          <source>Microbiology-Aliments-Nutrition</source>
          <volume>3</volume>
          <fpage>327</fpage>
          <lpage>332</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r52">
        <label>52</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Yerlikaya, O.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Probiotic potential and biochemical and technological properties of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis strains isolated from raw milk and kefir grains.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
          <volume>102</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>124</fpage>
          <lpage>134</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14983</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r53">
        <label>53</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Zarour, K., Benmechernene, Z.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2012</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Bioprospecting of Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains isolated from Algerian raw camel and goat milk for technological properties useful as adjunct starters.</article-title>
          <source>African Journal of Microbiology Research</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <issue>13</issue>
          <fpage>3192</fpage>
          <lpage>3201</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1542</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r54">
        <label>54</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group>
            <string-name>Zarour, K., Prieto, A., Pérez-Ramos, A., Kihal, M., López, P.</string-name>
          </person-group>
          <date date-type="pub">
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <article-title>Analysis of technological and probiotic properties of Algerian L. mesenteroides strains isolated from dairy and non-dairy products.</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Functional Foods</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          <fpage>351</fpage>
          <lpage>361</lpage>
          <ext-link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.09.001</ext-link>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
