hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad

Comparison of pollution load transport evaluation methods

Darko Barbalić
Đorđa Medić
Sanja Barbalić

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (447 KB) str. 717-725 preuzimanja: 378* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Barbalić, D., Medić, Đ. i Barbalić, S. (2006). Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja. Građevinar, 58 (09.), 717-725. Preuzeto s
MLA 8th Edition
Barbalić, Darko, et al. "Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja." Građevinar, vol. 58, br. 09., 2006, str. 717-725. Citirano 30.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Barbalić, Darko, Đorđa Medić i Sanja Barbalić. "Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja." Građevinar 58, br. 09. (2006): 717-725.
Barbalić, D., Medić, Đ., i Barbalić, S. (2006). 'Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja', Građevinar, 58(09.), str. 717-725. Preuzeto s: (Datum pristupa: 30.11.2020.)
Barbalić D, Medić Đ, Barbalić S. Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja. Građevinar [Internet]. 2006 [pristupljeno 30.11.2020.];58(09.):717-725. Dostupno na:
D. Barbalić, Đ. Medić i S. Barbalić, "Usporedba metoda za procjenu pronosa onečišćenja", Građevinar, vol.58, br. 09., str. 717-725, 2006. [Online]. Dostupno na: [Citirano: 30.11.2020.]

The paper starts with statement that the problem of proper evaluation of waterborne pollution load is increasingly encountered in the water management practice. The authors caution that the calculation methodology must be selected with great care so that its results can be used as basis for making good quality decisions. Most common load calculation methods are compared using the Kupa river drainage basin as an example. Calculation results are compared according to different methods, and suitability of individual methods for practical use is considered.

Ključne riječi
pollution load transport; calculation methodology; watercourse profile; the Kupa river drainage basin; comparison of results

Hrčak ID: 6910



Posjeta: 673 *