hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

Some of the Interpretation Disputes Related to Renaissance Philosophy

Erna Banić-Pajnić ; Institut za filozofiju, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (396 KB) str. 29-42 preuzimanja: 227* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Banić-Pajnić, E. (2002). Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju. Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine, 28. (1-2 (55-56)), 29-42. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688
MLA 8th Edition
Banić-Pajnić, Erna. "Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju." Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine, vol. 28., br. 1-2 (55-56), 2002, str. 29-42. https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688. Citirano 28.10.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Banić-Pajnić, Erna. "Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju." Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine 28., br. 1-2 (55-56) (2002): 29-42. https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688
Harvard
Banić-Pajnić, E. (2002). 'Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju', Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine, 28.(1-2 (55-56)), str. 29-42. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688 (Datum pristupa: 28.10.2020.)
Vancouver
Banić-Pajnić E. Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju. Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine [Internet]. 2002 [pristupljeno 28.10.2020.];28.(1-2 (55-56)):29-42. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688
IEEE
E. Banić-Pajnić, "Neka interpretacijska sporenja vezana uz renesansnu filozofiju", Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine, vol.28., br. 1-2 (55-56), str. 29-42, 2002. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688. [Citirano: 28.10.2020.]

Sažetak
Francis A. Yates’ original interpretation of Renaissance philosophy has been constantly criticized since the 1970’s, when it first secured its »place in the sun«. These critiques most often bear on her interpretations of Giordano Bruno’s supposed »revolutionary quality«, that is, her attempt to – interpreting Bruno in the context of the reception of Hermetic writings and tradition – debunk the myth that Bruno was a martyr of modern science.
This paper is a comment on one of the recent critiques of the line of interpretation of Renaissance philosophy initiated by Francis A. Yates. The point at issue is a book by Hilary Gatti, representative in a way because it once again tries to prove – precisely through disputing the aforementioned line of interpretation – that Bruno had anticipated many of the tenets of modern science, looking for its foothold in Bruno’s texts in which he deals with »mathematics«.
Since Yates’ interpretation has had many followers, especially among the historians of Italian philosophy, who had dealt with Frane Petrić in their research in Renaissance philosophy, and whose thought has many aspects that border on Bruno’s, this paper compares the theses that deal with Bruno’s philosophy with the theses presented in some of the modern interpretations of the philosopher from Cres.

Hrčak ID: 71688

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/71688

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 397 *