APA 6th Edition Jozić, B. (2004). Nedopisani Marulićev životopis. Colloquia Maruliana ..., 13, 149-156. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003
MLA 8th Edition Jozić, Branko. "Nedopisani Marulićev životopis." Colloquia Maruliana ..., vol. 13, 2004, str. 149-156. https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003. Citirano 21.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Jozić, Branko. "Nedopisani Marulićev životopis." Colloquia Maruliana ... 13 (2004): 149-156. https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003
Harvard Jozić, B. (2004). 'Nedopisani Marulićev životopis', Colloquia Maruliana ..., 13, str. 149-156. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003 (Datum pristupa: 21.06.2021.)
Vancouver Jozić B. Nedopisani Marulićev životopis. Colloquia Maruliana ... [Internet]. 2004 [pristupljeno 21.06.2021.];13:149-156. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003
IEEE B. Jozić, "Nedopisani Marulićev životopis", Colloquia Maruliana ..., vol.13, str. 149-156, 2004. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/8003. [Citirano: 21.06.2021.]
Sažetak Just as for the understanding of the works of an author a knowledge of his curriculum vitae is indispensable, so the biography also needs to be gleaned from the oeuvre. We know a good deal about Marulić’s life from Božićević’s Biography of Marko Marulić (Vita Marci Maruli Spalatensis), from Marulić’s will and some other archival sources, but parts of his biography are still covered in thick shade. The question of his bildung, his exceptional erudition in church matters (his knowledge of theology, the Scriptures, patristic literature, moralities and general orientation to such matters) has not been settled at all. Still more surprising is his exceptional acquaintance with the internal conditions in church communities, his assumption of superiority in his criticism of and advice to persons in the church. When to this one adds the fact that his friends, to whom he dedicates his works and leaves his wealth (MSS and books) in his will, are mainly people from the church, the impression is inevitably left that our great man of Split was not just a self-styled lay-theologian and engaged moral-didactic writer, although, apart from assumptions, it is difficult to make any reliable statements about the extent to which he was formally involved in ecclesiastical structures.