hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper

The Common Field of Identity and Difference: Speculative and Social Theory

Predrag Krstić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-2966-7082 ; University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, Serbia

Fulltext: croatian, pdf (396 KB) pages 3-18 downloads: 1.385* cite
APA 6th Edition
Krstić, P. (2012). Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija. Filozofska istraživanja, 32 (1), 3-18. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003
MLA 8th Edition
Krstić, Predrag. "Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija." Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 32, no. 1, 2012, pp. 3-18. https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003. Accessed 28 May 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krstić, Predrag. "Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija." Filozofska istraživanja 32, no. 1 (2012): 3-18. https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003
Harvard
Krstić, P. (2012). 'Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija', Filozofska istraživanja, 32(1), pp. 3-18. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003 (Accessed 28 May 2020)
Vancouver
Krstić P. Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija. Filozofska istraživanja [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 May 28];32(1):3-18. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003
IEEE
P. Krstić, "Zajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorija", Filozofska istraživanja, vol.32, no. 1, pp. 3-18, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003. [Accessed: 28 May 2020]

Abstracts
In confronting dilemmas of contemporary social science when attempting to articulate the concept of collective identity, this paper would try to recognize the motives of thinking the identity that has already been tried by the speculative philosophical tradition. It appears that in roundabout, so called “empirical” way the former are repeating the paradox of the latter: aiming at the boundary of the discursive understanding of the identity, they testify inner contradictions, and at the same time, necessity of establishing it. Both approaches ascertain unavoidable “dialectical” inter-play of the identity and the difference, that even in their radical self affirmation, imply, constitute, and endorse one another. However, there is still the question of how much is this “abstract” structural co-dependency operative, and also, is it possible to think past it or over it.

Keywords
identity; difference; social sciences; politics of identity; philosophy of difference1

Hrčak ID: 84003

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/84003

[croatian]

Visits: 1.840 *