APA 6th Edition Stanić, S. i Pandžić, J. (2012). PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA. Socijalna ekologija, 21 (2), 225-256. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017
MLA 8th Edition Stanić, Sanja i Josip Pandžić. "PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 21, br. 2, 2012, str. 225-256. https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017. Citirano 06.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Stanić, Sanja i Josip Pandžić. "PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA." Socijalna ekologija 21, br. 2 (2012): 225-256. https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017
Harvard Stanić, S., i Pandžić, J. (2012). 'PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA', Socijalna ekologija, 21(2), str. 225-256. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017 (Datum pristupa: 06.12.2019.)
Vancouver Stanić S, Pandžić J. PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 2012 [pristupljeno 06.12.2019.];21(2):225-256. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017
IEEE S. Stanić i J. Pandžić, "PROSTOR U DJELU MICHELA FOUCAULTA", Socijalna ekologija, vol.21, br. 2, str. 225-256, 2012. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/84017. [Citirano: 06.12.2019.]
Sažetak By rejecting the concept of time in favor of the concept of space Foucault became one of the representatives of the so called “spatial turn” in humanities and social sciences. Foucault’s approach to spatial discourse as his key term and conceptual scheme is a critical one. The concept of discursive space implies spaces where discourses on space come into contact with physical space in its architectural, urban and institutionalized forms. Foucault’s examples of mental hospital, hospital and prison show how Foucault’s static model of discursive space developed into a dynamic model of social space where what is said or thought is regulated by the relations of power, space and knowledge. Foucault’s utopias and heterotopias are spaces that are connected and in relation with all the other spaces but that are at the same time contradictory as they undermine the very sets of relations in which they appear. Foucault’s analysis of power is based on the concept of dispositif as a system of relations, a heterogeneous set of mechanisms that support and enable power. He widens the definition of dispositif, as consisting of symbiosis between two instances, knowledge and power, to include the dimension of space, thus constructing a kind of a trialectic between knowledge, power and space. In the conclusion of the paper the significance of Foucault’s category of space is emphasized as essential for all forms of social life, the practice of power and the construction of knowledge. Foucault’s attempt to rehabilitate the concept of space is seen as crucial for future approaches to research of social reality.