Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.10.3.6
Metacognition and Decision Making: between First and Third Person Perspective
Toma Strle
orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-6831
; Faculty of Education – University of Ljubljana
Sažetak
The aim of the article is firstly, to show how metacognitive monitoring, control (regulation) and meta-knowledge are important in guiding decision making and secondly, to argue that researching experience is necessary for a more complete understanding of the role of metacognition in decision making. In the context of dual process theories of cognition it is sometimes proposed that people usually do not deliberate or reflect on their judgments and decisions, but rather follow their intuitions. Some metacognition researchers propose that metacognitive experiences (such as feeling of rightness or difficulty) play an important role in determining whether we change our intuitive responses for more deliberate, reflective reasoning and decision making. Although metacognition researchers’ contribution to understanding the role of metacognitive experiences in decision making is valuable, their studies face some serious problems. Furthermore, it is not only our experiences, but also our evaluations of those experiences (metacognitive judgments) and our metacognitive knowledge that influence our judgments and choices. I argue that if we want to understand how and why people decide, we should be studying the entanglement of all these influencing factors from first and third person perspective. We should also conduct more thorough first person research. I conclude the article by arguing that first and third person perspective on metacognition and decision making should mutually constrain and inform each other about insights and contradictions that arise between them.
Ključne riječi
metacognition; decision making; intuition; deliberation; self-observation
Hrčak ID:
89639
URI
Datum izdavanja:
31.10.2012.
Posjeta: 2.516 *