hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Sažetak sa skupa

Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results

DM. Davis
ME. Packer
RM. Watson

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (45 KB) str. 316-316 preuzimanja: 205* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Davis, D., Packer, M. i Watson, R. (2002). Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 36 (3), 316-316. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052
MLA 8th Edition
Davis, DM., et al. "Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 36, br. 3, 2002, str. 316-316. https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052. Citirano 05.12.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Davis, DM., ME. Packer i RM. Watson. "Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results." Acta stomatologica Croatica 36, br. 3 (2002): 316-316. https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052
Harvard
Davis, D., Packer, M., i Watson, R. (2002). 'Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 36(3), str. 316-316. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052 (Datum pristupa: 05.12.2020.)
Vancouver
Davis D, Packer M, Watson R. Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2002 [pristupljeno 05.12.2020.];36(3):316-316. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052
IEEE
D. Davis, M. Packer i R. Watson, "Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.36, br. 3, str. 316-316, 2002. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052. [Citirano: 05.12.2020.]

Sažetak
AIM: To compare the maintenance requirements of implant supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant supported fixed prostheses natural teeth or complete dentures.
METHOD: The maintenance requirements were obtained by examining the dental records of 15 people, of whom 6 were edentulous in both arches and 9 edentulous in one arch. The results were compared to those obtained from 22 edentulous people in whom implants had been used in the mandible (control group). All the patients were treated with Nobel Biocare implants using standard implant and prosthetic protocols.
RESULTS: The main maintenance requirement was the need to repair part of the superstructure. The artificial teeth and the acrylic resin had to be repaired on 44 occasions in the group with implants in both jaws and 14 occasions in the group with implants opposed by natural
teeth. This compared with 2 occasions in the control group. Similarly the group with implants in both jaws were more likely to fracture the gold alloy framework, an event which occurred on 6 occasions. The Kruskal- Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks was used
to identify significant differences and Dunn’s method of All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures was used to distinguish which group differed from the other. The group with implants in both jaws was significantly different to the other two groups in relation to the higher incidence of fracture of the teeth and acrylic resin superstructure
(p<0.0001) and fracture of the gold alloy framework (p = 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: The maintenance requirements of implant supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant supported fixed prostheses are much greater than when opposed by natural teeth or complete dentures.

Hrčak ID: 10052

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/10052

Posjeta: 476 *