APA 6th Edition Figal, G. (1997). Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti. Politička misao, 34 (4), 144-150. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650
MLA 8th Edition Figal, Günter. "Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti." Politička misao, vol. 34, no. 4, 1997, pp. 144-150. https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650. Accessed 29 Mar. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Figal, Günter. "Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti." Politička misao 34, no. 4 (1997): 144-150. https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650
Harvard Figal, G. (1997). 'Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti', Politička misao, 34(4), pp. 144-150. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650 (Accessed 29 March 2020)
Vancouver Figal G. Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti. Politička misao [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2020 March 29];34(4):144-150. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650
IEEE G. Figal, "Pohvala prosvijećene posebnosti", Politička misao, vol.34, no. 4, pp. 144-150, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/105650. [Accessed: 29 March 2020]
Abstracts In this study, the author analyses the relationship between general culture and its particularistic segments within the integral political community and concludes: as long as there are citizens, there will be a conflict between the general and the singular; also, the mediation between these two categories is never final; instead, one should repeatedly define what is appropriate, right and compulsory. This is the strength of the type of reasoning to which the schematic landmarks such as universalism and particularism are necessary only as reminders of what is missing in order to fill in the gaps.