APA 6th Edition Mirić, J. (1996). Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe. Politička misao, 33 (1), 93-109. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029
MLA 8th Edition Mirić, Jovan. "Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe." Politička misao, vol. 33, br. 1, 1996, str. 93-109. https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029. Citirano 09.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Mirić, Jovan. "Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe." Politička misao 33, br. 1 (1996): 93-109. https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029
Harvard Mirić, J. (1996). 'Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe', Politička misao, 33(1), str. 93-109. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029 (Datum pristupa: 09.12.2019.)
Vancouver Mirić J. Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe. Politička misao [Internet]. 1996 [pristupljeno 09.12.2019.];33(1):93-109. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029
IEEE J. Mirić, "Fascinacija državom i (ne)mogućnost oporbe", Politička misao, vol.33, br. 1, str. 93-109, 1996. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/106029. [Citirano: 09.12.2019.]
Sažetak The author's thesis stated in the title is based on the theoretical and practical experience of modern political regimes, particularly on the example of the Croatian postcommunist experience. The author shows how the belated political constitution of the nation has occurred at the expense of political emancipation, pluralization and democratization. Small nations, which did not take part in the creation of modern state and the establishment of the contemporary political and legal culture, suffer from a double setback: they did not have a state of their own and are regarded small, “unhistorical” peoples. The fascination and obsession with the state and the identification of the nation with the state is especially visible in those postcommunist societies that have not gone through the process of political emancipation i.e. the emancipation of the state. The author points out that the fascination with the state has had serious consequences for the development of democracy since any oppositional opinion and activity or a criticism of the government is disqualified as an attack on the state. This fascination and the identification of the nation and the state is a barrier to state building since it stands in the way of its emancipation and integrational processes.