APA 6th Edition Grošelj, P. i Zadnik Stirn, L. (2013). BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT. Šumarski list, 137 (7-8), 403-409. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444
MLA 8th Edition Grošelj, Petra i Lidija Zadnik Stirn. "BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT." Šumarski list, vol. 137, br. 7-8, 2013, str. 403-409. https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444. Citirano 09.07.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Grošelj, Petra i Lidija Zadnik Stirn. "BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT." Šumarski list 137, br. 7-8 (2013): 403-409. https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444
Harvard Grošelj, P., i Zadnik Stirn, L. (2013). 'BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT', Šumarski list, 137(7-8), str. 403-409. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444 (Datum pristupa: 09.07.2020.)
Vancouver Grošelj P, Zadnik Stirn L. BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT. Šumarski list [Internet]. 2013 [pristupljeno 09.07.2020.];137(7-8):403-409. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444
IEEE P. Grošelj i L. Zadnik Stirn, "BETWEEN COMPROMISE AND CONSENSUS IN GROUP DECISIONS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT", Šumarski list, vol.137, br. 7-8, str. 403-409, 2013. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109444. [Citirano: 09.07.2020.]
Sažetak Forest management has become increasingly complex since economic profit became only one of several important management objectives. Considering a diverse set of goals requires the use of multi-criteria decision making. When the only goal was to maximize timber production, the planning process often involved only one decision maker: the forest owner. In the last 20 years, however, planning has changed to include the interests of multiple stakeholders, including local communities, public representatives, hunters, environmentalists, and recreationists, each of which has different knowledge, experiences, prospects, and interests. The formation of a group of stakeholders can be based on participatory planning. The main challenge in group decision making is to resolve the conflict of the group’s objectives and preferences. Aggregating individual preferences is not only a mathematical problem but also a philosophical one. We present the analytic hierarchy process as suitable multi-criteria method, which has been already applied in areas such as forestry and harvest scheduling, biodiversity conservation, regional planning, and forest sustainability. A case study of the forest area at Pohorje, a mountainous area in northern Slovenia, was conducted in order to implement the described theoretical findings. The aim of the study was to select the optimal alternative for Pohorje development. We identified five possible alternatives based on indicators of sustainability. The alternatives were compared by several stakeholders according to the results of a SWOT analysis performed at a workshop of stakeholders, who discussed individual chapters of forest management scenarios. The results of the analysis show that the alternative benefits for people, which takes into account all of Pohorje’s important aspects, is the most appropriate for Pohorje development.