Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Pregledni rad

New Facts and Evidence in the Process of Judicial Control of Arbitral Decisions

Vladimir Pavić ; Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 583 Kb

str. 821-838

preuzimanja: 1.376

citiraj


Sažetak

Litigation strives toward efficiency by introducing inter alia restrictions on introducing new facts and evidence once the judgment has been rendered. Such new facts and evidence are impermissible, save in the presence of exceptional circumstances expressly provided in law. Arbitration proceedings are geared toward efficiency at least as much as litigation. However, legislation governing arbitration and international conventions seldom – if ever – contain rules on admissibility of new facts and evidence in the setting aside and recognition proceedings. This paper attempts to flesh out possible approaches to constraining of beneficium novorum in those proceedings. There is a number of conceivable solutions, such as analogous application of the rules applicable in the context of domestic legal remedies in civil proceedings (both ‘ordinary’ and ‘extraordinary’ remedies), alternative (sui generis) solutions, etc.

Ključne riječi

arbitration; new facts; new evidence; beneficium novorum; annulment; recognition; enforcement

Hrčak ID:

109731

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731

Datum izdavanja:

15.7.2013.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 2.325 *