hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

The Word "Liberty" on the Chains of Galley-Slaves: Bosanquet's Theory of the General Will

Igor Primorac ; University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (3 MB) str. 85-101 preuzimanja: 170* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Primorac, I. (1993). Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje. Politička misao, 30 (1), 85-101. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986
MLA 8th Edition
Primorac, Igor. "Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje." Politička misao, vol. 30, br. 1, 1993, str. 85-101. https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986. Citirano 27.06.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Primorac, Igor. "Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje." Politička misao 30, br. 1 (1993): 85-101. https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986
Harvard
Primorac, I. (1993). 'Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje', Politička misao, 30(1), str. 85-101. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986 (Datum pristupa: 27.06.2019.)
Vancouver
Primorac I. Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje. Politička misao [Internet]. 1993 [pristupljeno 27.06.2019.];30(1):85-101. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986
IEEE
I. Primorac, "Riječ "sloboda" na okovima Galijota-Bosanquetova teorija opće volje", Politička misao, vol.30, br. 1, str. 85-101, 1993. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986. [Citirano: 27.06.2019.]

Sažetak
This is a critical examination of the most elaborate statement of the general
will theory. Bosanquet contrasts our „Jower", merely "actual" will, described as
a series of momentary and passing, ignorant, routine, commonplace, irational,
barren, mutually conflicting violations, with our „high“, "true", "real", will, which
is a comprehensive and coherent system of stable and long-term, well informed
violations that require effort of self sacrifice and are expressed in "the great
moments of life". His central thesis is that the individual's „real" will is the "general
will" of the community that has been internalized and makes up the individual's
"higher'', "better" self. The theory is meant to solve the problem of political
obligation by showing that, when obeying the law, the individual obeys only himself/
herself, and his/her freedom is not curtailed but rather affirmed. The author argues
that Bosanquet's argument fails at both crucial steps: it does not succeed in
contrasting our "actual" and our "real" will, nor in identifying the latter with the
"general will" of our community. The individual will is not embedded in his/ her
community the way the theory makes it out to be, and if we have a moral obligation
to obey the law, it is not grounded in the "general will" of community as our
own "higher'', "true" will

Hrčak ID: 111986

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/111986

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 252 *