APA 6th Edition Sokol, S. (1992). Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam. Politička misao, 29 (3), 4-17. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341
MLA 8th Edition Sokol, Smiljko. "Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam." Politička misao, vol. 29, no. 3, 1992, pp. 4-17. https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341. Accessed 3 Dec. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Sokol, Smiljko. "Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam." Politička misao 29, no. 3 (1992): 4-17. https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341
Harvard Sokol, S. (1992). 'Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam', Politička misao, 29(3), pp. 4-17. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341 (Accessed 03 December 2020)
Vancouver Sokol S. Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam. Politička misao [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2020 December 03];29(3):4-17. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341
IEEE S. Sokol, "Polupredsjednički sustav i parlamentarizam", Politička misao, vol.29, no. 3, pp. 4-17, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/112341. [Accessed: 03 December 2020]
Abstracts The author believes that the Croatian constitutional model (as a basic feature and a group of institute which define the relationship between the legislative and the executive power through the constitutional law) happens to be only an institutional variant of parliamentarism which - in all contemporary democracies - in practice finds expression in the form of parliamentarism with its balance tilted in favour of the executive power. According to the author, the reality of the Croatian semipresidential system is in no way essentially different from the reality of the relationship between the legislative and executive power not only in the French Fifth Republic but also in other developed European democracies. The president of the Republic of Croatia has in fact legal authority or political power in no way larger of those of the President of the French Republic, the German Chancellor, or in particular the British Prime Minister. The author tries to explain and to prove these two theses through a comparative examination of the features of the constitutions in terms of constitutional law, the history of their development, and the contemporary reality of both the full parliamentary and the semipresidential system.