hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Acta stomatologica Croatica, Vol. 48 No. 1, 2014

Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3

Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials

Damir Jelušić ; Dental Polyclinic “Dr Jelušić”, Opatija, Croatia
Ivan Puhar ; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
Darije Plančak ; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Fulltext: english, pdf (199 KB) pages 25-32 downloads: 162* cite
APA 6th Edition
Jelušić, D., Puhar, I. & Plančak, D. (2014). Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 48 (1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
MLA 8th Edition
Jelušić, Damir, et al. "Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 48, no. 1, 2014, pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3. Accessed 16 Jan. 2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jelušić, Damir, Ivan Puhar and Darije Plančak. "Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials." Acta stomatologica Croatica 48, no. 1 (2014): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
Harvard
Jelušić, D., Puhar, I., and Plančak, D. (2014). 'Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 48(1), pp. 25-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
Vancouver
Jelušić D, Puhar I, Plančak D. Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 January 16];48(1):25-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
IEEE
D. Jelušić, I. Puhar and D. Plančak, "Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.48, no. 1, pp. 25-32, 2014. [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
Fulltext: croatian, pdf (199 KB) pages 25-32 downloads: 271* cite
APA 6th Edition
Jelušić, D., Puhar, I. & Plančak, D. (2014). Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 48 (1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
MLA 8th Edition
Jelušić, Damir, et al. "Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 48, no. 1, 2014, pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3. Accessed 16 Jan. 2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jelušić, Damir, Ivan Puhar and Darije Plančak. "Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala." Acta stomatologica Croatica 48, no. 1 (2014): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
Harvard
Jelušić, D., Puhar, I., and Plančak, D. (2014). 'Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 48(1), pp. 25-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
Vancouver
Jelušić D, Puhar I, Plančak D. Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 January 16];48(1):25-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3
IEEE
D. Jelušić, I. Puhar and D. Plančak, "Procjena stabilnosti implantata nakon podizanja dna sinusa i primjene različitih nadomjesnih materijala", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.48, no. 1, pp. 25-32, 2014. [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/3

Paper in XML format

Abstracts
Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate implant stability following sinus lift with two grafting materials, and to compare it with the results obtained for the implants placed in a pristine posterior maxilla. Materials and methods: The study included 44 healthy patients with an existing indication for sinus lift procedure (test group). 46 implants were placed following sinus lift with a pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate, while 39 implants were placed following augmentation with 60% hydroxyapatite with 40% beta-tricalcium phosphate material. The control group consisted of 48 healthy patients who were treated with 85 implants but without bone
augmentation in posterior maxilla. Astra Tech OsseoSpeed implants were placed in all subjects. Resonance frequency analysis was used in both groups for determining implant stability 4 months after insertion. A mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) was calculated on the basis of 3 measurements. Results: No statistical difference was observed in ISQ values of implants placed with and without augmentation procedure (p=0,789). Statistically significant difference was not found when ISQ values of implants placed following particular grafting material were compared with ISQ values of corresponding implants in a pristine bone (p=0.697 and p=0.402). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the implant stability is comparable among implants placed in the posterior maxilla regardless of sinus lift and grafting procedure. Implants placed in the grafted posterior maxilla can be predictably loaded as the implants placed in a non-grafted, pristine maxilla.

Keywords
Dental Implants; Sinus Floor Augmentation; Resonance frequency analysis; Beta-tricalcium phosphate; Hydroxyapatites

Hrčak ID: 117930

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/117930

References

1 

Woo I, Le BT. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent. 2004;13(1):28–32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000116369.66716.12 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15017301

2 

Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr;30(2):207–29. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3516738

3 

Stern A, Green J. Sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Jan;56(1):219–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.09.003 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117952

4 

Garofalo GS. Autogenous, allogenetic and xenogenetic grafts for maxillary sinus elevation: literature review, current status and prospects. Minerva Stomatol. 2007 Jul- Aug;56(7-8):373–92. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17912196

5 

Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):8–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9474608

6 

Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994 Feb;15(2):152–60. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8055503

7 

Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9(3):166–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00050.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17716261

8 

Handschel J, Simonowska M, Naujoks C, Depprich RA, Ommerborn MA, Meyer U, et al. A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials. Head Face Med. 2009 Jun 11;5:12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519903

9 

Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Dec;24(6):565–77. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15626319

10 

Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743–54. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974108

11 

Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Akca K, Eckert SE. Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1015–32. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20162105

12 

Huang HM, Pan LC, Lee SY, Chiu CL, Fan KH, Ho KN. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Sep;90(3):285–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.108918 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10982948

13 

Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Aug;14(4):437–43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00818.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12869006

14 

Ersanli S, Karabuda C, Beck F, Leblebicioglu B. Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period. J Periodontol. 2005 Jul;76(7):1066–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1066 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16018748

15 

Kokovic V, Jung R, Feloutzis A, Todorovic VS, Jurisic M, Hämmerle CH. Immediate vs. early loading of SLA implants in the posterior mandible: 5-year results of randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e114–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12072 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23278375

16 

Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid- etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19438966

17 

Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A, Carinci F. Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus- augmented and nongrafted sites. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):144–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00042.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17716258

18 

Rasmusson L, Thor A, Sennerby L. Stability evaluation of implants integrated in grafted and nongrafted maxillary bone: a clinical study from implant placement to abutment connection. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Mar;14(1):61–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00239.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20491814

19 

Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):166–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00050.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17716261

20 

Suba Z, Takács D, Matusovits D, Barabás J, Fazekas A, Szabó G. Maxillary sinus floor grafting with beta-tricalcium phosphate in humans: density and microarchitecture of the newly formed bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Feb;17(1):102–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01166.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16441791

21 

Zijderveld SA, Zerbo IR, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):432–40. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15973955

22 

Kurkcu M, Benlidayi ME, Cam B, Sertdemir Y. Anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite vs β-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation: a comparative histomorphometric study. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Sep;38(Spec No):519–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00061 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23072285

23 

Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. RFA values of implants placed in sinus grafted and nongrafted sites after 6 and 12 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):178–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00113.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18783420

24 

Di Lallo S, Ricci L, Orecchioni S, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Perrotti V. Resonance Frequency Analysis Assessment of Implants Placed with a Simultaneous or a Delayed Approach in Grafted and Nongrafted Sinus Sites: A 12-Month Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):394–400. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22967171

25 

Tuna T, Yorgidis M, Strub JR. Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Mar;39(3):226–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21972928

[croatian]

Visits: 785 *