APA 6th Edition Markešić, I. (2013). Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava. Socijalna ekologija, 22 (3), 201-219. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822
MLA 8th Edition Markešić, Ivan. "Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 22, br. 3, 2013, str. 201-219. https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822. Citirano 17.05.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Markešić, Ivan. "Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava." Socijalna ekologija 22, br. 3 (2013): 201-219. https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822
Harvard Markešić, I. (2013). 'Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava', Socijalna ekologija, 22(3), str. 201-219. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822 (Datum pristupa: 17.05.2021.)
Vancouver Markešić I. Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 2013 [pristupljeno 17.05.2021.];22(3):201-219. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822
IEEE I. Markešić, "Kriza eko-sustava iz perspektive Luhmannove teorije sustava", Socijalna ekologija, vol.22, br. 3, str. 201-219, 2013. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/118822. [Citirano: 17.05.2021.]
Sažetak Luhmann starts from the assumption that modern societies are functionally differentiated into individual systems, such as politics, economy, law, science, education, religion, etc. None of these functional sub-systems, which are equal, can represent the society as a whole or act in the name of that society (not even politics, which is supposed to lead the development of society). Based on these theoretical premises, we argue that society, as a communication system, is put (or puts itself) into danger because it does not respond to disasters in its environment as a whole but rather allows any one of these functional differentiated sub-systems to act on its behalf. This means that each individual sub-system react in their own specific way (economy from the cost/benefit perspective, politics from the perspective of the chances of winning or losing the elections, science from the perspective of new research, religion from the perspective of the world as God’s creation, etc.).
Therefore, if these differentiated sub-systems are unable to resolve accumulating ecological problems, we pose a very obvious question: Can modern societies truly overcome current ecological crisis caused by technological development? In other words, is ecology, as individual, functionally differentiated, social sub-system in itself, able to “communicate” the environmental crisis of modern society?