APA 6th Edition Bošnjak Botica, T. (2013). Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika. Lahor, 1 (15), 63-90. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645
MLA 8th Edition Bošnjak Botica, Tomislava. "Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika." Lahor, vol. 1, br. 15, 2013, str. 63-90. https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645. Citirano 20.04.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Bošnjak Botica, Tomislava. "Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika." Lahor 1, br. 15 (2013): 63-90. https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645
Harvard Bošnjak Botica, T. (2013). 'Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika', Lahor, 1(15), str. 63-90. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645 (Datum pristupa: 20.04.2021.)
Vancouver Bošnjak Botica T. Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika. Lahor [Internet]. 2013 [pristupljeno 20.04.2021.];1(15):63-90. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645
IEEE T. Bošnjak Botica, "Opća načela podjela na glagolske vrste u hrvatskome u perspektivi drugih bliskih jezika", Lahor, vol.1, br. 15, str. 63-90, 2013. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/125645. [Citirano: 20.04.2021.]
Sažetak In the first part of the paper the author briefly presents basic classifica-
tions of verbs into conjugational classes (types) in Croatian from the ear-
liest grammatical descriptions which divided verbs into three conjugational
classes according to the present morphemes (Kašić 1604, Della Bella 1728,
Voltić 1803, Starčević 1812), through Babukić’s grammar (1836) where Do-
brovski’s classification according to the infinitive morphemes was applied
and other 19th and 20th century grammatical classifications to the latest:
Jelaska (2003, 2005) where three groups (present morpheme) with ten types
(infinitive vs. present morphemes) and nine classes for athematic verbs were
introduced; and Bošnjak Botica (2011) where all but the first two types were
complemented by additional classes (morpho-semantic criteria). A few clas-
sifications from their general principles of classification have been analyzed:
hierarchical complexity, number of category and order. In the second part of
the paper, the Croatian classifications are compared to those in some other
Slavic languages: Bosnian (Jahić, Halilović, Palić (2000), Serbian (Belić
1956, 2006, Klajn 2005), Slovenian (Toporišić 2004), Macedonian (Koneski
1981), Russian (Russkaja gramatika AN 1980, Rozental’ i dr. 2003, Bud-
mani 1920) and Czech (Komárek i dr. 1986). Similarities and differences
are presented, those that arise from various theoretical and methodological
approaches and those that stem from the morphological and phonological
features inherent to every language.