hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Stručni rad
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7

Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici

Davor Špehar ; Privatna ordinacija dentalne medicine, Bjelovar, Hrvatska
Marko Jakovac ; Zavod za fiksnu protetiku, Stomatološki fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (302 KB) str. 137-144 preuzimanja: 759* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Špehar, D. i Jakovac, M. (2015). Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49 (2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Špehar, Davor i Marko Jakovac. "Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 49, br. 2, 2015, str. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7. Citirano 27.09.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Špehar, Davor i Marko Jakovac. "Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici." Acta stomatologica Croatica 49, br. 2 (2015): 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
Harvard
Špehar, D., i Jakovac, M. (2015). 'Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49(2), str. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
Vancouver
Špehar D, Jakovac M. Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 27.09.2021.];49(2):137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
IEEE
D. Špehar i M. Jakovac, "Nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici kao gradivnom materijalu u fiksnoj protetici", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.49, br. 2, str. 137-144, 2015. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (302 KB) str. 137-144 preuzimanja: 477* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Špehar, D. i Jakovac, M. (2015). New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49 (2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Špehar, Davor i Marko Jakovac. "New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 49, br. 2, 2015, str. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7. Citirano 27.09.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Špehar, Davor i Marko Jakovac. "New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics." Acta stomatologica Croatica 49, br. 2 (2015): 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
Harvard
Špehar, D., i Jakovac, M. (2015). 'New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49(2), str. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
Vancouver
Špehar D, Jakovac M. New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 27.09.2021.];49(2):137-144. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7
IEEE
D. Špehar i M. Jakovac, "New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.49, br. 2, str. 137-144, 2015. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Dentalna keramika danas je jedan od osnovnih gradivnih materijala u fiksnoj protetici. Naime, povećani estetski zahtjevi potaknuli su nastanak novih keramičkih materijala kako bi se izbjegla upotreba metalnog skeleta te dobio potpuno keramički rad s mehaničkim svojstvima koja dovoljno dobro podnose jače okluzalne sile. Od svih dosadašnjih keramičkih materijala cirkonij-oksidna keramika ima najbolja mehanička svojstva i jedino se njome možemo koristiti za, u rasponu, dulje fiksnoprotetske radove. No unatoč tomu, estetska svojstva nisu zadovoljavala jer nije bilo translucentnosti. Zbog toga se na cirkonijev dioksid počelo u slojevima nanositi (slojevati) ostale
keramike. Nakon što se počeo upotrebljavati u dentalnoj medicini, cirkonijev dioksid smatrao se idealnim materijalom za fiksnu protetiku koji će vrlo brzo zamijeniti metal-keramičke radove. No tijekom kliničke uporabe te u studijama in vivo i in vitro pokazalo se da i dalje postoji mnogo problema, unatoč poboljšanjima. U ovom preglednom radu željeli smo otkriti nove spoznaje o cirkonij-oksidnoj keramici i tehničkim postupcima koji bi mogli povećati kliničku uspješnost i dugovječnost radova od toga materijala.

Ključne riječi
fiksni protetski rad; dentalna keramika; cirkonijev dioksid; dentalna ljuska; translucencija

Hrčak ID: 139975

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/139975

▼ Article Information



Introduction

Dental ceramics represents one of the major structural materials in modern fixed prosthodontics. As a material in dental medicine, zirconium-dioxide was introduced in the 1970s when different types of coverage for dental implants were investigated (1). The first use of zirconium-dioxide in fixed prosthodontics was when small amounts of aluminum-oxide (Al2O3), in glass-infiltrated ceramic (In Ceram, Zahnfabrik Vita, Germany), were replaced by zirconium-dioxide crystals (ZrO2). Later on, the development of zirconium-dioxide was followed by the development and improvement of CAD/CAM technology, as the only commercial way for making restorations in fixed prosthodontics from this material. To understand the values of zirconium-ceramics and its excellent mechanical properties, the development of dental ceramics in general must be considered.

Most dental ceramics consist of an amorphous part and crystals. The amount and size of crystals determine the mechanical properties. The amorphous part predominantly consists of SiO2 (glass), which gives ceramics an esthetically pleasant and natural looking appearance (translucency), and insures chemical bond with resin cements. Basic types of ceramics, such as feldspathic ceramic, predominantly consist of glass, and only have small amounts of crystals, which cannot insure good mechanical properties and functional longevity for crowns and bridges in posterior region. Because of this, these ceramics have been veneered on metal framework, which insures mechanical stability while the esthetics of ceramic remains. Demands for better esthetics and natural looking appearance led to development of new ceramics with increased amount of crystals that could withstand greater forces and can be used as a single material without metal framework. These were glass-infiltrated ceramics, that are crystalline-based systems (mostly alumina, Al2O3) with added glass, and glass-ceramics, that are glass-based systems with added crystals. But, due to its limited mechanical properties, they could only be used in up to three-unit bridges in premolar region. Because of this, new polycrystalline ceramics, such as aluminum-oxide and zirconium-oxide ceramics were introduced. These ceramics consist only of crystals and do not have an amorphous part.

Zirconium-dioxide has excellent mechanical properties, with flexural strength of 900-1200 MPa and hardness of 1200 HV (2) (Table 1). These values are almost the same as of metals used for metal-ceramic restorations, and significantly higher than values of all other ceramics used in dentistry. Apart from the absence of an amorphous part, the reason for such good mechanical properties lies in the behavior of the zirconium-dioxide under applied stress. Unlike other ceramics, which develop cracks due to applied loads, leading to material fracture, after the crack formation in zirconium ceramics, those cracks are constricted and stopped and do not progress further.

Table 1 Mechanical properties of zirconium-dioxide
Densityg/cm3>6
Porosity%<0.1
Traction resistanceMPa900-1200
Compression resistanceMPa2000
Young modulGPa210
Fracture toughness KICMPa/m7-10
High termal expansionK-111x10-6
Thermal conductivityWm/K2
HardnessHV0.11200

Structure of zirconium-dioxide

To understand excellent mechanical properties of zirconium-dioxide the basic structure must be understood. Zirconium-dioxide is a polycrystalline material that can be found in nature in mineral that has monoclinic crystalline structure. By heating it up to 1170oC, zirconium-dioxide transforms into tetragonal phase; and by heating it up to 2370oC it transforms into the cubic phase. This transformation between crystalline phases is reversible and cooling causes the return into monoclinic phase. With the phase transformation, the volume of crystalline grains is changed, and exactly this volume change was used for getting excellent mechanical properties. To get the stable material that can be used in dentistry, and medicine in general, the zirconium-dioxide is stabilized by adding 3-5% Y2O3 in tetragonal phase. These small amounts of Y2O3 inhibit tetragonal to monoclinic transformation below 1170o allowing the presence of tetragonal phase at the room temperature. This tetragonal phase is only partially stabilized, and under stress applied to the surface can transform into monocline phase. That is why this material is called yttrium-partially-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-PSZ) (3, 4). The zirconium-dioxide is stabilized in tetragonal phase, because in the tetragonal phase the material is white in color and has excellent mechanical properties. The phase stability and mechanical properties depends on crystalline grain size. Crystals which are too large cause unstable material and spontaneous transformation into monoclinic phase, whereas crystals which are too small inhibit transformation, leading to reduced fracture toughness (5). As mentioned, stress applied to the surface of ceramic causes crack formation leading to the fracture of the material. Unlike other ceramic systems, when cracks initiate in the zirconium-ceramic phase the transformation from tetragonal to monocline which occurs around the crack with the volume increase of crystalline grains of approximately 4.5%. This volume increase causes constriction of crack and hardening of the material (6-8) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Phase transformation around crack
ASC_49(2)_137-144-f1

When introduced in medicine, zirconium-ceramic, with its excellent biocompatibility and white color was considered an ideal material for clinical practice (hip replacement). However, after the promising start, problems arose and hips started to fracture unexplainably (9, 10). It was discovered that sterilization causes “aging“ of material and spontaneous transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic phase, which weakens the material and causes fracture under very small loads. Concentration and distribution of yttrium-oxide, grain size, the amount of cracks present before clinical use, manufacturing process and finishing procedures all affect aging of zirconium-dioxide (7, 11).

The final production in dental laboratory or dental office, and the quality of material contributes the most to the functional longevity of zirconium-ceramic in the mouth. Due to absence of translucency, zirconium-dioxide cannot be used as a single material for dental restorations and needs veneering with feldspathic or glass-ceramic. For the use in fixed prosthodontics, zirconium-ceramic is manufactured individually or comes as industrially made final products such as posts or implant abutments. If custom made, zirconium-dioxide is used for crowns, bridges and supra-structures on teeth and implants, and manufactured using CAD/CAM technology. Today, most zirconium-ceramics are milled in pre-sintered phase, because the material is very soft, of chalk consistency, which simplifies the production, allowing easy milling without excessive wear of the burs and possible damage of the material. Apart from this, if sintered, zirconium-dioxide is produced using CAD/CAM technology, the mechanical properties of final restorations are poorer than the declared ones (12-14). This phenomenon occurs due to surface microcracks and fractures that appear after such treatment (15). The pre-sintered restorations are approximately 30% bigger, because sinterization causes volume shrinkage, and achieves equal tetragonal structure without cracks. Caution is required if the final sintered restoration needs to be adjusted to avoid crack formation before placing the restoration into the mouth, and transformation into monoclinic phase which could decrease its mechanical properties and cause fracture. This is important, because despite the fact that this phase transformation around the crack causes strengthening of the material, this phenomenon can occur only once. If it occurs before placing the restoration in the mouth, the zirconium-dioxide does not have ability for new transformation, and if new crack appears under occlusal loads the fracture could not be stopped any more and would lead to the fracture of the material (Figure 2). Consequently, zirconium-dioxide is treated differently than metal, using water-cooling and special burs. Sandblasting with Al2O3 under high pressure and using particles which are too large should be avoided, because it can also induce surface phase transformation (16).

Figure 2 Zirconium framework fracture caused by inappropriate laboratory treatment
ASC_49(2)_137-144-f2

Chipping problems

The main problem of zirconium-dioxide restorations in clinical practice has become fracture of veneering ceramic or chipping. In general, chipping can be classified as minor and major chipping. Minor chipping does not compromise esthetics and function of the restoration, and in most cases requires only polishing or composite repair, while major chipping implies bigger fractures with zirconium framework exposed. The residual stresses in the veneer ceramic can be considered the most important factor in the chipping phenomenon, but the exact origin of these stresses is still unknown. Residual stresses can be compressive and tensile. Compressive stresses improve mechanical properties of material, while tensile stresses cause material fracture (17, 18). Thermal characteristics of zirconium framework and veneering ceramic and zirconium/veneer interface characteristics are considered the most important factors that influence generating of residual stresses in the veneer ceramic.

Zirconium-dioxide and ceramics used for veneering have different coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). This mismatch in CTE is similar to metal-ceramic restorations, and was designed on purpose in order to achieve the similar mechanical properties. Despite that, laboratory results showed the presence of tensile stresses in the deep layers of veneer ceramic, unlike metal-ceramic restorations where only compressive stresses were recorded (19-22). Apart from this, zirconium-dioxide conducts heat slower than veneering ceramic (23, 24). As a result, heating and cooling processes during veneer firing can additionally influence thermal characteristic differences between these two materials and increase residual stresses within veneer ceramic. In vitro tests showed that when slow heating and cooling during firing of the veneer ceramic were applied, the restorations achieved better fracture resistance (24, 25). On the other hand, latest observations of stress distribution within veneer ceramic using focus ion beam nanotomography (FIB-nt), showed the presence of tensile stress in the deep layers of veneer ceramic submitted to slow cooling (18). Knowing the fact that tensile stresses lead to material fracture, these findings are contrary to previous in vitro results (24, 25). Apart from thermal characteristics, the interface between framework and veneering ceramic can also induce the presence of residual stresses. As mentioned, different surface treatments on zirconium framework can cause the change of phase and size of surface crystals. Apart from decreasing of mechanical properties, this transformation causes generation of stresses within framework surface that could secondly cause development of residual stresses in the veneer ceramic (26). Apart from this, monoclinic zirconium-dioxide has much lower CTE, which further influences the generating of stresses in these areas (27). In addition to surface changes, a good bond between framework and veneer insures homogenous structure and stress distribution from framework to the bond layer and finally to the veneer. If this bond is affected by different surface changes the stress is distributed directly to the veneer, causing increased stress, which can be up to 12 times bigger than in homogenous interface (28).

Repeated occlusal loads on the veneer during function, with generated residual tensile stresses can lead to crack formation and veneer fracture. To try to overcome this problem, new veneering ceramics and techniques have been proposed. Instead of veneering only with weak feldspathic ceramic, zirconium framework is veneered with glass-ceramic. Apart from this, the over-pressing technique has been introduced, where the whole veneer is over-pressed to the zirconium framework at once. This ceramics is industrially prepared, has always the same quality and the possible procedure mistakes during layering that can lead to potential flaws and artefacts which could then lead to veneer fracture are excluded (29). Apart from veneering ceramics and application technique, anatomically designed framework and veneer/framework thickness ratio, with lower ratio, also contribute to better clinical performance of zirconium-ceramic restorations and decreased chipping. Modification of zirconium framework design to anatomical shape leads to uneven thickness of strong framework and equal veneer thickness. Since the zirconium framework has excellent mechanical characteristics, they would not be greatly influenced by uneven thickness, but would insure uniform support for weak veneer ceramic and better clinical performance (30).

All these factors must be taken into account to minimize the failures of these restorations. Moreover, the newest techniques include CAD/CAM production of whole veneer from lithium-disilicate ceramics, which is then joined with zirconium framework. These restorations show much better mechanical properties compared to layered or over-pressed zirconium restorations (31, 32). The latest development in production of zirconium-dioxide is high-translucency (HT) zirconium-dioxide, which allows production of full-contoured monolithic restorations without need for veneer and risk of chipping (Figure 3). These restorations are stained to get better esthetics, but the development of HT zirconium still has not progressed sufficiently to achieve excellent esthetics, and therefore its indications are still in the posterior region, whereas for the anterior teeth the veneered zirconium-ceramic is used.

Figure 3 HT zirconium-dioxide (Zenostar Zr Translucent Pure, Wieland Dental, Germany)
ASC_49(2)_137-144-f3

Clinical studies

Clinical studies regarding reliability and longevity of zirconium-ceramic restorations are in the correlation with the in vitro studies (33-48). Fracture of the veneer ceramic is the main complication, but the incidence of major and minor chipping is hard to strictly determine since there is no standardized fracture categorization. On the other hand, zirconium framework fracture occurs very rare. Anatomical design of zirconium framework decreases the possibility of chipping and leads to better clinical performance (36, 38-40). Different veneering techniques also affect the reliability of zirconium restorations, with the greatest improvements when veneer ceramic was over-pressed to the anatomically designed zirconium framework (38). Nevertheless, the survival rate of zirconium-ceramic restorations is very high, because most of the reported veneer fractures are minor ones, and are easy to repair in the mouth without compromising the esthetics and function.

Conclusion

After great expectations from zirconium-ceramics, the clinical use has shown imperfections of this material. There is still no standardized technical procedure in manufacturing of fixed restorations, which leads to great discrepancies in reliability of zirconium-ceramics. From its introduction, it has undergone many improvements, but further enhancements are needed for it to become the gold standard in dental medicine.

References:

1 

Cranin AN, Schnitman PA, Rabkin SM, Onesto EJ. Alumina and zirconia coated vitallium oral endosteal implants in beagles. J Biomed Mater Res. 1975 Jul;9(4):257–62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820090429 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1176508

2 

ISO TC 150/SC 1. Implants for surgery-ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP). ISO/DIS 13356, 1995.

3 

Rieth PH, Reed JS, Naumann AW. Fabrication and flexural strength of ultra-fine grained yttria-stabilised zirconia. Bull Am Ceram Soc. 1976;55:717.

4 

Gupta TK, Bechtold JH, Kuznickie RC, Cadoff LH, Rossing BR. Stabilization of tetragonal phase in polycrystalline zirconia. J Mater Sci. 1978;13:1464–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00553200

5 

Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):299–307. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17659331

6 

Garvie RC, Hannink RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic steel? Nature. 1975;258:703-47. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999 Jan;20(1):1–25. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9916767

7 

Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999 Jan;20(1):1–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9916767

8 

Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):289–98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.005 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17624420

9 

Maccauro G, Piconi C, Burger W, Pilloni L, De Santis E, Muratori F, et al. Fracture of a Y-TZP ceramic femoral head, analysis of a fault. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Nov;86(8):1192–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B8.15012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15568536

10 

Piconi C, Maccauro G, Pilloni L, Burger W, Muratori F, Richter HG. On the fracture of a zirconia ball head. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Mar;17(3):289–300. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-7316-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16555122

11 

Kosmač T, Kocjan A. Aging of dental zirconia ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32(11):2613–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.024

12 

Jakovac M. Utjecaj toplinske obrade na mikrostrukturne promjene i ostala svojstva cirkonijeve keramike [dissertation]. Zagreb:Stomatološki fakultet; 2008.

13 

Luthardt RG, Rieger W, Musil R. Grinding of zirconia-TZP in dentistry-CAD/CAM-technology for the manufacturing of fixed dentures. In: Sedel, L; Rey, C - editors. 10th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine Bioceramics 10, Paris: Elsevier; 1997. p. 437-40.

14 

Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina-advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1999;7:113–9. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11314423

15 

Luthardt RG, Holzhüter MS, Rudolph H, Herold V, Walter MH. CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1999 Dec;7(4):113–9. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11314423

16 

Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Goller G, Özcan M. Evaluation of air-particle abrasion of Y-TZP with different particles using microstructure analysis. Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58(2):183–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12065 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23713638

17 

Baldassarri M, Stappert CFJ, Wolff MS, Thompson VP, Zhang Y. Residual stresses in porcelain-veneered zirconia prostheses. Dent Mater. 2012 Aug;28(8):873–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.019 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22578663

18 

Mainjot AK, Douillard T, Gremillard L, Sadoun MJ, Chevalier J. 3D-characterization of the veneer-zirconia interface using FIB nano-tomography. Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):157–65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.010 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228334

19 

Mainjot AK, Schajer GS, Vanheusden AJ, Sadoun MJ. Residual stress measurement in veneering ceramic by hole-drilling. Dent Mater. 2011 May;27(5):439–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.12.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21232786

20 

Mainjot AK, Schajer GS, Vanheusden AJ, Sadoun MJ. Influence of cooling rate on residual stress profile in veneering ceramic: measurement by hole-drilling. Dent Mater. 2011 Sep;27(9):906–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.005 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21676454

21 

Mainjot AK, Schajer GS, Vanheusden AJ, Sadoun MJ. Influence of zirconia framework thickness on residual stress profile in veneering ceramic: measurement by hole-drilling. Dent Mater. 2012 Apr;28(4):378–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153718

22 

Mainjot AK, Schajer GS, Vanheusden AJ, Sadoun MJ. Influence of veneer thickness on residual stress profile in veneering ceramic: measurement by hole-drilling. Dent Mater. 2012 Feb;28(2):160–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.008 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153325

23 

Swain MV, Johnson L, Syed R, Hasselman D. Thermal diffusivity, heat capacity and thermal conductivity of porous partially stabilized zirconia. J Mater. 1986;5(8):799–802.

24 

Tan JP, Sederstrom D, Polansky JR, McLaren EA, White SN. The use of slow heating and slow cooling regimens to strengthen porcelain fused to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):163–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60050-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22385692

25 

Rues S, Kröger E, Müller D, Schmitter M. Effect of firing protocols on cohesive failure of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):163–9. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22385692

26 

Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2010 Aug;26(8):807–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20537701

27 

Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Roos M, Trottmann A, Sailer I, Hämmerle CHF. Load-bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques. Dent Mater. 2011 Oct;27(10):1045–53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21820726

28 

Rocha EP, Anchieta RB, Freitas AC, de Almeida EO, Cattaneo PM, Chang Ko C. Mechanical behavior of ceramic veneer in zirconia-based restorations: a 3- dimensional finite element analysis using microcomputed tomography data. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):14–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60184-9 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21194583

29 

Baldassarri M, Zhang Y, Thompson VP, Rekow ED, Stappert CFJ. Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported zirconium-oxide fixed dental prostheses related to veneering techniques. J Dent. 2011 Jul;39(7):489–98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21557985

30 

Guess PC, Bonfante EA, Silva NRFA, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Effect of core design and veneering technique on damage and reliability of Y-TZP-supported crowns. Dent Mater. 2013 Mar;29(3):307–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228337

31 

Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009 Jan;25(1):121–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620748

32 

Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent. 2012 Feb;40(2):154–62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.007 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22197634

33 

Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium- oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Oct;96(4):237–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17052467

34 

Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):383–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17695869

35 

Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Weber F, Johnen C. HIP zirconia fixed partial dentures--clinical results after 3 years of clinical service. Quintessence Int. 2008 Jun;39(6):459–71. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19057742

36 

Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):223–7. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18548960

37 

Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G, Latzke P, Heussen N, Spiekermann H. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):217–22. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18548959

38 

Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Dec;13(4):445–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0249-5 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19169719

39 

Sailer I, Gottnerb J, Kanelb S, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: A 3-year follow- up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):553–60. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918588

40 

Schmitt J, Holst S, Wichmann M, Reich S, Gollner M, Hamel J. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: a prospective clinical 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):597–603. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918596

41 

Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, Ohlmann B, Gabbert O. Clinical performance of extended zirconia frame- works for fixed dental prostheses: two-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:610–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01969.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19496928

42 

Wolfart S, Harder S, Eschbach S, Lehmann F, Kern M. Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;117(6):741–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00693.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20121939

43 

Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gernet W, Edelhoff D, Guth J, Naumann M. Prospective study of zirconia-based restorations: 3-year clinical results. Quintessence Int. 2010 Sep;41(8):631–7. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20657851

44 

Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A, Rinke S. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):141–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20305852

45 

Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ. A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Nov;141(11):1317–29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0076 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21037189

46 

Peláez J, Cogolludo P, Serrano B, Lozano JFL, Suárez MJ. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: Three-year clinical results. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Jun;107(6):373–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22633593

47 

Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, Mohamed SE. Clinical efficiacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-years results. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Jun;107(6):373–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22633593

48 

Rinke S, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):164–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3229 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23476912


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 1.787 *