hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad

LAY AND EXPERT APPREHENSION OF TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS

Ognjen Čaldarović ; Faculty of Philosophy, Zagreb
Dejan Škanata

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (25 MB) str. 361-386 preuzimanja: 157* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Čaldarović, O. i Škanata, D. (1995). LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA. Socijalna ekologija, 4 (4), 361-386. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390
MLA 8th Edition
Čaldarović, Ognjen i Dejan Škanata. "LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 4, br. 4, 1995, str. 361-386. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390. Citirano 14.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Čaldarović, Ognjen i Dejan Škanata. "LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA." Socijalna ekologija 4, br. 4 (1995): 361-386. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390
Harvard
Čaldarović, O., i Škanata, D. (1995). 'LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA', Socijalna ekologija, 4(4), str. 361-386. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390 (Datum pristupa: 14.12.2019.)
Vancouver
Čaldarović O, Škanata D. LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 1995 [pristupljeno 14.12.2019.];4(4):361-386. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390
IEEE
O. Čaldarović i D. Škanata, "LAIČKO I EKSPERTNO POIMANJE TEHNOLOŠKIH RIZIKA", Socijalna ekologija, vol.4, br. 4, str. 361-386, 1995. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390. [Citirano: 14.12.2019.]

Sažetak
The paper dissertates two basic approaches to hazards and risks.
The first, lay approach, which is the most widespread in general public, founds its risk perception and assessment of on a range of elements not based on measurement, classification and knowledge of real dimensions of hazards and risks. It is based on specific value characteristics that are attributed to risks as complex phenomena.
Expert risk assessment, on the other hand, is based on measurement, tolerance doses and trust in risk control by various technological measures. Expert approach categorizes risks, classifies them and defines the risk acceptances limits using various methods.
The paper shows that the two approaches start form different assumptions and value frameworks, pointing to the most important reasons of their mutual intolerance. Authors describe the main methods of expert risk assessment, and main characteristics of lay risk perception which should be taken into account when so called "lay reactions" to risks are being considered.
The conclusive part of the paper points out the basic reasons for differences between lay and expert approach to risks, as well as the most important presumptions for overcoming of the differences.

Ključne riječi
experts; laymen; public; risk; risk assessment; risk management; risk perception; social theory of risk; technology

Hrčak ID: 141390

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/141390

[hrvatski] [njemački]

Posjeta: 295 *