hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Stručni rad
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7

Estetski intrakanalni kolčići

Ivana Parčina Amižić ; Ordinacija dentalne medicine Doma zdravlja Splitsko-dalmatinske županije, Split, Hrvatska
Anja Baraba ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (187 KB) str. 143-150 preuzimanja: 143* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Parčina Amižić, I. i Baraba, A. (2016). Estetski intrakanalni kolčići. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50 (2), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Parčina Amižić, Ivana i Anja Baraba. "Estetski intrakanalni kolčići." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 50, br. 2, 2016, str. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7. Citirano 29.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Parčina Amižić, Ivana i Anja Baraba. "Estetski intrakanalni kolčići." Acta stomatologica Croatica 50, br. 2 (2016): 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
Harvard
Parčina Amižić, I., i Baraba, A. (2016). 'Estetski intrakanalni kolčići', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50(2), str. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
Vancouver
Parčina Amižić I, Baraba A. Estetski intrakanalni kolčići. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 29.09.2020.];50(2):143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
IEEE
I. Parčina Amižić i A. Baraba, "Estetski intrakanalni kolčići", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.50, br. 2, str. 143-150, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (187 KB) str. 143-150 preuzimanja: 208* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Parčina Amižić, I. i Baraba, A. (2016). Esthetic Intracanal Posts. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50 (2), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Parčina Amižić, Ivana i Anja Baraba. "Esthetic Intracanal Posts." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 50, br. 2, 2016, str. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7. Citirano 29.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Parčina Amižić, Ivana i Anja Baraba. "Esthetic Intracanal Posts." Acta stomatologica Croatica 50, br. 2 (2016): 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
Harvard
Parčina Amižić, I., i Baraba, A. (2016). 'Esthetic Intracanal Posts', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50(2), str. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
Vancouver
Parčina Amižić I, Baraba A. Esthetic Intracanal Posts. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 29.09.2020.];50(2):143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7
IEEE
I. Parčina Amižić i A. Baraba, "Esthetic Intracanal Posts", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.50, br. 2, str. 143-150, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Primarna zadaća intrakanalnih kolčića jest osigurati retenciju za nadogradnju zuba i omogućiti potpuno brtvljenje koronarnog dijela korijenskog kanala. Tradicionalno korišteni metalni kolčići ne ispunjavaju zahtjeve moderne dentalne medicine zbog nedostataka kao što su boja, podložnost koroziji, mehanička retencija i veliki modul elastičnosti koji može rezultirati lomom korijena. Da bi se sve to izbjeglo, počela je proizvodnja estetskih keramičkih i vlaknima ojačanih intrakanalnih kolčića. Kako se danas mnogo pozornosti posvećuje estetici, upotreba spomenutih kolčića u kombinaciji s kompozitnom / keramičkom nadogradnjom vrlo je česta u restaurativnoj dentalnoj medicini i postaje standard zahvaljujući ne samo njihovoj estetici, nego i biokompatibilnosti, dobrim fizikalno-mehaničkim svojstvima i adhezivnom vezivanju na tvrda zubna tkiva i nadogradnju. Ipak, kliničari trebaju poznavati različite vrste kolčića i pripaziti na razlike među njima kako bi pravilno odabrali i upotrijebili odgovarajuću vrstu.

Ključne riječi
tehnika kolčića i nadogradnje, cirkonijev oksid, vlaknima ojačani polimeri; polietilen

Hrčak ID: 160306

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/160306

▼ Article Information



Introduction

A successful clinical outcome of endodontically treated teeth depends on adequate root canal instrumentation (1, 2) and three-dimensional obtuartion (3, 4) as well as on adequate restorative treatment performed afterwards (5). The loss of more than a half of the coronal tooth structure, caused by caries, fracture or extensive cavity preparation, mandates the use of posts (6) as they provide restorations with enhanced retention and stability (7). Traditionally used metal posts do not meet the requirements of modern dental medicine, due to disadvantages such as color, corrosion potential, non-adhesive bonding and high modulus of elasticity which can lead to root fracture. In order to enhance the esthetic aspects, physical properties and biocompatibility, a wide range of esthetic posts have been developed and become commercially available. In addition to esthetic and health benefits, they hold the capacity of adhesive bonding to tooth tissue and core buildup and that potentiates the creating of the monoblock, a gap-free single unit in which the loading stresses are evenly distributed and borne by all the monoblock components (8).

CERAMIC ZIRCONIA POSTS

All-ceramic restorations have gained popularity due to their excellent esthetic properties and biocompatible nature (9), consequently increasing the use of white and translucent posts made of zirconia and other ceramic materials for the same reasons. Partially stabilized zirconium dioxide (Zr20)?? mislim da je to (LŠ) (Zr02), a ceramic material, formed by adding yttrium oxide (Y2O3), was introduced by the end of 1980's (10, 11) and recommended for the fabrication of posts because of high fracture and bending strength by which the posts can withstand functional loads.

Apart from its favorable chemical stability, good esthetic and physical properties (12), zirconia also yields excellent radiographic opacity, superior light transmission properties (13) and Young's modulus similar to that of the stainless steel alloy (14). However, the high elastic modulus of zirconia posts at 200 Gpa causes stress to be transferred to the less rigid dentin, thereby resulting in root fractures (15). Furthermore, zirconia posts are stiff, but at the same time very brittle, without any ductility (9). Therefore, it is necessary to make a deep post preparation which, on the other hand, prevents the use of a minimally invasive approach when it comes to removing the dentin tissue. Furthermore, if a failure occurs and there is a need for endodontic retreatment, the reported strength becomes a significant disadvantage because it is nearly impossible to remove a zirconia post from the root canal (16).

Few techniques for zirconia post and core reconstruction are available: direct composite build-ups, adhesively luted ceramic core, and ceramic core heat-pressing and one-piece ceramic post-and-core restorations. Although in vitro zirconia posts exhibit lower fracture strength when used with composite cores than with ceramic cores (14), clinical long-term success appears to be excellent for a combination with composite core system (17). Within the group with ceramic cores, zirconia posts achieve higher fracture strength when used with bonded prefabricated ceramic core than with bonded custom-made ceramic core (18). This lower value of heat-pressed custom-made ceramic core over zirconia post is a result of changes in the inner structure of the zirconia material during the heating process. Conversely, the retentive strength of zirconia post with direct heat-pressed ceramic core is significantly higher than with adhesively bonded ceramic core (19).

Zirconia posts are indicated in grossly destructed tooth, areas with heavy forces and in high lip line and thin gingival tissue for achieving better esthetics (20). To improve the bond strength of zirconia post to core and root dentin, it is recommended to use resin cements (21) and do surface pretreatment of which the most effective is airborne particle abrasion using silicated Al2O3 particles in a combination with silanization (22).

FIBER REINFORCED POSTS

In 1990, a new nonmetallic material for the fabrication of posts based on the carbon fiber reinforcement principle was introduced. (23). Although these post are easy to manipulate and have good mechanical properties, low toxicity and low modulus of elasticity, more similar to that of dentin (24), their color and difficulty of concealment under composite or all-ceramic restoration prevents them to be classified as esthetic posts. In order to meet the cosmetic requirements, posts reinforced with glass and quartz fibers were manufactured. Apart from good esthetics, their advantageous properties are also high impact resistance, attenuation and softening of vibration, shock absorption and increased fatigue resistance (25).

PREFABRICATED GLASS- AND QUARTZ-FIBER POSTS

Translucent and tooth colored silica-based posts were introduced in 1992. They are made of high volume percentage prestretched silanizated glass- or quartz- fibers bounded by methacrylate- or epoxy-polymer matrix with high degree of conversion and highly cross-linked structure that binds the fibers (26). The fibers offer strength and stiffness, while the polymer matrix transfers loads to the fibers and also protects them from the moisture of the oral environment (27).

BisGMA and epoxy resins are commonly used as a resin based material for dental fiber posts which are therefore compatible with adhesive restoration techniques. This allows chemical and micromechanical bonding of fiber post to the root dentin that leads to a uniform stress distribution (28). Due to this fact and the similarity in elastic modulus with dentine (18-42 GPa) (29), biomechanical performance is better and fracture resistance increases. Additionally, stress distribution and fracture resistance of a silica-based post are not significantly influenced by post length and diameter, hence the restoration technique is less sensitive to post dimension in this case than when stainless steel posts are included (30).

The silica-based fibers can be made of glass or quartz. Quartz is a crystalline form of silica, whereas glass is monocrystalline. It has been found that that the quartz fiber posts are more radiopaque (31), have a higher flexural strength than the glass fiber posts (32) and that the teeth restored with quartz fiber posts have higher fracture strength than those with glass fiber posts (33).

However, in dentistry, E- and S-glass fibers have become the most commonly used reinforcing fibers. Glass fibers stretch uniformly under stress to their breaking point, and on removal of the tensile load short of breaking point, the fiber returns to its original length. E (electrical application)-glass has good tensile and compressive strength, as well as electrical insulation and rather low cost, but relatively poor fatigue resistance, while S (stiff, strong)-glass has a different chemical composition, giving higher tensile strength and better wet strength retention, but is rather expensive (34).

The most frequent failure of fiber post restoration is post debonding (35) which can happen on the post/cement or cement/dentine interface. The bond between glass fiber post and composite substrates is difficult to achieve by means of free radical polymerization bonding because the organic component of fiber post is a polymer matrix that is highly cross-linked with a high degree of conversion and a small number of carbon-carbon double bonds on the surface (36). Because of this inert and nonreactive polymer matrix, recent research suggest to treat the post with H2O2 (24%) for 1 minute to selectively dissolve the polymer matrix and expose the glass fibers, allowing micromechanical interlocking of adhesive/cement with the post (37). H2O2 is frequently used in dental practice, mainly for dental bleaching- It is easy and safe to use and doesn't affect the integrity of the fiber posts. Furthermore, after the H2O2 treatment, the exposed fibers become available to chemically bond to the adhesive/cement through the silane agent (38). For glass fiber post cementation light-irradiated dual-cure materials provide the most reliable option (39).

Although clinical studies have not showed significant difference for root fracture incidence between metal and glass fiber post (40), the latter are often first clinician’s choice, not only because of their sufficient esthetics, biocompatibility, flexural and fatigue strength, favorable elastic modulus and bond strength of fibers to composite substrates, but also because they are cheap, easy to handle allowing one-visit therapy. Besides, they are easily removed if necessary. However, when restoring teeth with prefabricated glass fiber post, it should be considered that indication applies only to teeth with well conserved radicular structure (20) because they require preparation of the root canal to fit the shape of the post, which causes the loss of dentin and makes the root more vulnerable to root fracture (41). Also, by using the prefabricated FRC posts, the free space of a larger coronal root canal opening remains filled only with cement and due to changes during polymerization shrinkage. This may cause detachment of the luting resin from the dentin, consequently leading to microleakage along the post space and, also, to the failure of the post.

INDIVIDUAL GLASS FIBER POSTS

In the early 2000s, individually formed glass fiber reinforced posts were introduced (29) to eliminate the shortcomings and improve the advantages of the prefabricated glass reinforced posts. They are made of unidirectional, silanated E-glass fibers impregnated with a combination of two non-polymerized polymers, PMMA as a linear phase and poly Bis-GMA as the cross-linked phase that form semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN). PMMA chains, with molecular weight of 220 KD, plasticize the cross-linked Bis-GMA based matrix and thus reduce the stress formation in the fiber-matrix interface during deflection (29). Because of the non-polymerized semi-IPN, the monomers of adhesive resins and cements can diffuse into the linear polymer phase and by polymerization, form interdiffusion bonding and so-called secondary semi-IPN structure (42) that contributes to the better load transfer from the core to the root. Resin substrates suitable for dissolving the IPN matrix, i.e. linear polymer, are the ones containing monomers such as Bis-GMA, TEGDMA or HEMA (36) and belong to those that are most commonly used in restorative dentistry.

Since they are not polymerized, the IPN posts can be easily adapted to the shape of the root canal, thereby possibly reducing the number of voids and potentially reducing the number of post decementations (43). The concept of using individually formed FRC posts is based on minimizing the preparation need to the deeper parts of the root canal thus allowing addition of higher quantity of FRC material to the coronal root canal opening of the tooth. In this way, the concept saves the dentin, minimizes stress at the apical parts of the post and enables stiff and fracture resistant post with larger diameter to the core that forms strong support for the core (41). Additionally, the coronal part of the IPN-post can be bent to the desired angulation and adapted to meet the requirements of the crown restoration. Individually glass fiber posts can also be used in curved and oval root canals as well as in very large canals, where several posts of different lengths and diameters can be placed in the same canal by means of lateral condensation.

Although individually glass fiber posts, in a comparison with prefabricated glass fiber posts, show higher flexural strength (29), higher fracture resistance (44), higher bonding strength without adhesive (post-cement interface) failure (43, 45), they are more complicated to use for an inexperienced clinician due to a highly sticky nature of a non-polymerized matrix and fibers tendency to separation.

POLYETHYLENE FIBER POSTS

Several years before the IPN-post was introduced, a fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core system based on a woven polyester bondable ribbon had been (46). This reinforcement material, that has been commercially available since 1992, is composed of plasma treated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers woven into three dimensional structure, leno wave or triaxial braid. Due to special patterns of cross-linked threads, a higher mechanical interlocking is provided. Also, the fiber’s superficial tension is reduced due to cold gas plasma pretreatment in order to ensure good chemical bond to resin materials (47).

According to the manufacturer, apart from having excellent properties in translucency, polyethylene fibers exceed the breaking point of fiberglass and are so tough that special scissors are required to cut them. In addition, unlike loosely braided or bundles of unidirectional fibers, these fibers do not spread or fall apart when manipulated because the dense network of locked-stitched threads prevents the fibers from shifting during manipulation and adaptation before polymerization (48). Because of these characteristics, polyethylene fibers can be bent to sharp angles and woven to make tight mechanical inter-locking from one thread to another. Also, these ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers have a high elasticity coefficient and a high resistance to stretch, distortion and traction (49) that allows them to adapt closely to the contours of the root canal and to properly condense, increasing the content of individually made endodontic post thus decreasing the luting-agent thickness and consequently its polymerization shrinkage. Since the fibers adapt to the root canal, the canal enlargement is not required, hence the natural strength of the tooth is preserved and a possibility of the root perforation is eliminated. In a comparison with other fiber reinforced posts (including the individually glass fiber reinforced post), an individually shaped polyethylene post cemented with dual-cure resin cement shows the least amount of microleakage in overflared root canals (50).

Unlike the continuous unidirectional fibers that give the highest strength and stiffness for the composite only in the direction of the fiber orientation, polyethylene fibers reinforce the polymer in all direction so that the mechanical properties are isotropic (51). Woven fiber architecture enhances fracture resistance which is also evident in the case of cracks induced by load. The crack stops at the node of the leno-lock-stitch weave, thereby preventing the crack propagation from the restoration to the tooth and helping maintain the integrity of the fiber reinforcement (52).

It has been shown that polyethylene-reinforced resin provides sufficient retention required for clinical success of a post and core system (53) and adequate fracture resistance with increased incidence of repairable fractures in structurally compromised canals (54). However, high price of polyethylene fibers limits their use in daily practice despite the abovementioned excellent characteristics.

Conclusion

The primary function of endodontic post is to provide retention for the core and enable full sealing of coronal portion of the root canal. Therefore, it should bond firmly to the root dentin and buildup core. Additionally, an endodontic post should have sufficient fracture strength to withstand the loads, but elastic modulus similar to that of dentin to enable more uniform stress distribution and prevent root fractures.

Since much attention is given to esthetic aspects, more esthetically pleasing posts with composite/ceramic cores have become very common in restorative dentistry. In fact, they are becoming a standard because they are esthetically pleasing, biocompatible and have good physical properties.

The successful restoration of an endodontically treated tooth is an ongoing challenge for a restorative dentist. Before inserting a post, factors such as remaining amount of coronal tissue, root canal size and configuration, tooth position, functional requirements and occlusion need to be analyzed.

The clinician should be aware of the differences between the endodontic posts in order to select and use the most appropriate post system in each specific situation.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

1 

Paloma De Oliveira B, Meneze Aguari C, Cruz Câmara A, Muniz De Albuquerque M, Regis De Barros Correia AC, Felts De La Roca Soares M. Evaluation of Microbial Reduction in Root Canals Instrumented with Reciprocating and Rotary Systems. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49:294–303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc49/4/4

2 

Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A Comparative Study of Shaping Ability of four Rotary Systems. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49:285–93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc49/4/3

3 

Monterde M, Pallarés A, Cabanillas C, Zarzosa I, Victoria A. A Comparative in Vitro Study of Apical Microleakage of Five Obturation Techniques. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014;48:123–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc48/2.123

4 

Ozbay G, Kitiki B, Peker S, Kargul B. Apical Sealing Ability of a Novel Material: Analysis by Fluid Filtration Technique. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014;48:132–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc48/2.132

5 

Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu L-S, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):895–902. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21689541

6 

Christensen GJ. Intracoronal and extracoronal tooth restorations 1999. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Apr;130(4):557–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0251 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10203907

7 

Coelho CSDM, Biffi JCG, Da Silva GR, Abrahăo A, Campos RE, Soares CJ. Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts. Dent Mater J. 2009 Nov;28(6):671–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.671 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20019417

8 

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):391–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17368325

9 

Segal BS. Retrospective assessment of 546 all-ceramic anterior and posterior crowns in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):544–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115180 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11404754

10 

Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Jan-Feb;2(1):51–5. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2688667

11 

Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Jan;23(1):45–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230105 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2708404

12 

Špehar D, Jakovac M. New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49:137–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/7

13 

Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Sfolkos J, Sfolkos K. Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Oct;24(5):462–9. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15506027

14 

Ozkurt Z, Işeri U, Kazazoğlu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J. 2010 May;29(3):233–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-128 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20467158

15 

Bateman G, Ricketts DNJ, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J. 2003 Jul 12;195(1):43–8, discussion 37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810278 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12856030

16 

Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent. 1999 Summer;1(2):153–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11725680

17 

Paul SJ, Werder P. Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass-ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):524–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15543908

18 

Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Feb;28(2):120–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00720.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11298259

19 

Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Retention of selected core materials to zirconia posts. Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):455–61. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12216563

20 

Shetty PP, Meshramkar R, Nadiger R, Patil K. A finite element analysis for a comparative evaluation of stress with two commonly used esthetic posts. Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):419–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.120668 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932115

21 

Gernhardt CR, Bekes K, Schaller H-G. Short-term retentive values of zirconium oxide posts cemented with glass ionomer and resin cement: an in vitro study and a case report. Quintessence Int. 2005 Sep;36(8):593–601. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16161461

22 

Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Apr;95(4):302–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16616128

23 

Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr. 1990 Nov 22;60(540):131–41. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2272223

24 

Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):605–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00149.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9021333

25 

Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater. 2002 Dec;18(8):596–602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12385901

26 

Kallio TT, Lastumäki TM, Vallittu PK. Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent Mater. 2001 Jan;17(1):80–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00064-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11124417

27 

Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont. 1996 Dec;5(4):270–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00511.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9171502

28 

Jongsma LA, Bolhuis PB, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Benefits of a two-step cementation procedure for prefabricated fiber posts. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Feb;12(1):55–62. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20155231

29 

Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell A-M, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004 Jan;20(1):29–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14698771

30 

González-Lluch C, Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, Pérez-González A, Barjau-Escribano A, Vergara-Monedero M, et al. Influence of material and diameter of pre-fabricated posts on maxillary central incisors restored with crown. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Oct;36(10):737–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01989.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19702682

31 

Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56 Suppl 1:77–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21564118

32 

Galhano GA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod. 2005 Mar;31(3):209–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137652.49748.0c PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15735472

33 

Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):431–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123227 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12011860

34 

Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-M. Fibre-Reinforced Composites As Root Canal Posts. [dissertation]. Turku (FI): University of Turku; 2007.

35 

Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008 Feb;39(2):117–29. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18560650

36 

Lastumäki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials. 2002 Dec;23(23):4533–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00197-7 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12322973

37 

De Sousa Menezes M, Queiroz EC, Soares PV, Faria-e-Silva AL, Soares CJ, Martins LRM. Fiber post etching with hydrogen peroxide: effect of concentration and application time. J Endod. 2011 Mar;37(3):398–402. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.037 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21329829

38 

Monticelli F, Osorio R, Sadek FT, Radovic I, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review. Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):346–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-86 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18505227

39 

Liu C, Liu H, Qian Y-T, Zhu S, Zhao S-Q. The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post. Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Mar;6(1):56–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.83 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24177170

40 

Figueiredo FED, Martins-Filho PRS. Faria-E-Silva AL. Do Metal Post-retained Restorations Result in More Root Fractures than Fiber Post-retained Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015 Mar;41(3):309–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25459568

41 

Makarewicz D, Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-MB, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Effect of cementation technique of individually formed fiber-reinforced composite post on bond strength and microleakage. Open Dent J. 2013 Jul 26;7:68–75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601307010068 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986792

42 

Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Vallittu PK. Penetration of bonding resins into fibre-reinforced composite posts: a confocal microscopic study. Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):46–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00900.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15606823

43 

Mannocci F, Machmouridou E, Watson TF, Sauro S, Sherriff M, Pilecki P, et al. Microtensile bond strength of resin-post interfaces created with interpenetrating polymer network posts or cross-linked posts. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Nov 1;13(11):E745–52. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18978719

44 

Abo El-Ela OA, Atta OA, El-Mowafy O. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;74(5):441. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18538068

45 

Bell AM, Lassila LVJ, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent. 2005 Aug;33(7):533–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.014 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005792

46 

Karna JC. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent. 1996 Oct;9(5):230–2. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9545911

47 

Chaoting Y, Gao S, Mu Q. Effect of low-temperature-plasma surface treatment on the adhesion of ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene fibres. J Mater Sci. 1993;28:4883–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00361151

48 

Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Biomechanical properties and clinical use of a polyethylene fibre post-core material. Int Dent S Afr. 2006;8:20–6.

49 

Vitale MC, Caprioglio C, Martignone A, Marchesi U, Botticelli AR. Combined technique with polyethylene fibers and composite resins in restoration of traumatized anterior teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2004 Jun;20(3):172–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00201.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15144450

50 

Erkut S, Gulsahi K, Caglar A, Imirzalioglu P, Karbhari VM, Ozmen I. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):96–105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-47 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18335739

51 

Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):318–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70276-3 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10050121

52 

Karbhari VM, Strassler H. Effect of fiber architecture on flexural characteristics and fracture of fiber-reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater. 2007 Aug;23(8):960–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.08.003 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17084889

53 

Singh A, Logani A, Shah N. An ex vivo comparative study on the retention of custom and prefabricated posts. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Apr;15(2):183–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.94583 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557821

54 

Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods. J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):312–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00827.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22339985


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 660 *