hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001

The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality

Veronika Valkovičová   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-9988 ; Comenius University, Bratislava, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Institute of European Studies and International Relations

Fulltext: english, pdf (1 MB) pages 9-38 downloads: 392* cite
APA 6th Edition
Valkovičová, V. (2017). The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality. Croatian International Relations Review, 23 (77), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
MLA 8th Edition
Valkovičová, Veronika. "The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality." Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 77, 2017, pp. 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001. Accessed 9 May 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Valkovičová, Veronika. "The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality." Croatian International Relations Review 23, no. 77 (2017): 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
Harvard
Valkovičová, V. (2017). 'The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality', Croatian International Relations Review, 23(77), pp. 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
Vancouver
Valkovičová V. The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality. Croatian International Relations Review [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 May 09];23(77):9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
IEEE
V. Valkovičová, "The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality", Croatian International Relations Review, vol.23, no. 77, pp. 9-38, 2017. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
Fulltext: croatian, pdf (1 MB) pages 9-38 downloads: 102* cite
APA 6th Edition
Valkovičová, V. (2017). Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost. Croatian International Relations Review, 23 (77), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
MLA 8th Edition
Valkovičová, Veronika. "Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost." Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 77, 2017, pp. 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001. Accessed 9 May 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Valkovičová, Veronika. "Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost." Croatian International Relations Review 23, no. 77 (2017): 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
Harvard
Valkovičová, V. (2017). 'Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost', Croatian International Relations Review, 23(77), pp. 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
Vancouver
Valkovičová V. Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost. Croatian International Relations Review [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 May 09];23(77):9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001
IEEE
V. Valkovičová, "Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost", Croatian International Relations Review, vol.23, no. 77, pp. 9-38, 2017. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0001

Abstracts
The aim of this article is to explore the conceptualisation of benchmarking, ranking and good practice sharing tools within European Union gender equality policymaking. In the first part, the article looks at these soft law measures applied within intergovernmental cooperation. Stemming from the extensive body of literature, the study approaches these measures as a form of scientific knowledge, which is diversely applied within policymaking. Next, the article directs various points of criticism at these policymaking tools through different variables that may hinder knowledge use. The second section of this article further focuses on the Open Method of Coordination and the role of the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) in relation to gender equality policies. The empirical part of this article is focused on the criticism of EIGE’s External Evaluation Report and the different conceptualisations of scientific knowledge use which are presented within this audit document. As such, this article aims to contribute to a new conceptualisation of the technocratic tools of benchmarking, ranking and good practice sharing within the highly ideological area of gender equality policies.

Keywords
knowledge use; benchmarking; ranking; good practice sharing; gender equality policy; EIGE

Hrčak ID: 178236

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/178236

[croatian]

Visits: 718 *