hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Šumarski list, Vol. 141 No. 3-4, 2017.

Prethodno priopćenje
https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4

Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density

Matija Stergar ; SLOVENIA FOREST SERVICE
Klemen Jerina ; UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA, BIOTEHNICAL FACULTY, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND RENEWABLE FOREST RESOURCES

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (1 MB) str. 139-149 preuzimanja: 143* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Stergar, M. i Jerina, K. (2017). Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density. Šumarski list, 141 (3-4), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4
MLA 8th Edition
Stergar, Matija i Klemen Jerina. "Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density." Šumarski list, vol. 141, br. 3-4, 2017, str. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4. Citirano 23.02.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Stergar, Matija i Klemen Jerina. "Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density." Šumarski list 141, br. 3-4 (2017): 139-149. https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4
Harvard
Stergar, M., i Jerina, K. (2017). 'Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density', Šumarski list, 141(3-4), str. 139-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4
Vancouver
Stergar M, Jerina K. Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density. Šumarski list [Internet]. 2017 [pristupljeno 23.02.2019.];141(3-4):139-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4
IEEE
M. Stergar i K. Jerina, "Wildlife and forest management measures significantly impact red deer population density", Šumarski list, vol.141, br. 3-4, str. 139-149, 2017. [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.141.3-4.4

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) is in many parts of the world ecologically important and highly popular game species. Its population densities and environmental impacts largely depend on habitat suitability, which in turn is under strong influence of humans. Wildlife management intentionally improves habitat suitability, while forestry's impacts on red deer are mostly unintentional. In both disciplines the full extent of these impacts is poorly understood. To better understand habitat use and improve management of red deer, we studied the impacts of multiple environmental and historical factors, mostly anthropogenic, on red deer spatial distribution in Slovenia. We found that the probability of red deer presence and population density are higher close to locations of historic (> 100 years ago) red deer reintroduction sites and in large continuous forest complexes. The finding is important for forecasting future red deer distribution and population dynamics. Population density is also positively dependent on proximity to supplemental feeding sites, the proportion of spruce stands in pole-stage and the share of forest young growth, which is important for preventing unwanted impacts of red deer on forest. The approach used by this study and its results are also useful for improving habitat ranking of hunting grounds, which some countries use in wildlife management planning.

Ključne riječi
red deer; habitat suitability; population density; wildlife management; forest management; supplemental feeding; Slovenia

Hrčak ID: 181411

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/181411

Reference

1 

Adamič M. 1990: Prehranske značilnosti kot element načrtovanja varstva, gojitve in lova parkljaste divjadi s poudarkom na jelenjadi (Cervus elaphus L.), Strokovna in znanstvena dela št. 105, VTOZD za gozdarstvo in Inštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvo, 203 p., Ljubljana.

2 

Adamič M. 1991: The influence of forestry on winter feeding and spacing strategies of red deer in southern Slovenia, Yugoslavia, In: Global trends in wildlife management, B. Bobek, K. Perzanowski, and W. Regelin (eds.) Trans. 18th IUGB Congres Krakow 1987. Swiat Press. Krakow-Warzawa , 331-334.

3 

Adamič M., Dovč P., Frank J. 2007: Varstvena genetika jelenjadi, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta. Ljubljana.

4 

Adamič M., Jerina K. 2011: Ungulates and their management in Slovenia, European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, 507-526, New York.

5 

Allen A. M., Mansson J., Jarnemo A., Bunnefeld N. 2014: The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer. Eur J Wildlife Res , 60: 411-421.

6 

Alves J., da Silva A. A., Soares A., Fonseca C. 2014: Spatial and temporal habitat use and selection by red deer: The use of direct and indirect methods. Mamm Biol, 79: 338-348.

7 

Apollonio M., Andersen R., Putman R. J. 2010: European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, 604 p., Edinburgh.

8 

Baasch D. M., Fischer J. W., Hygnstrom S. E., VerCauteren K. C., Tyre A. J., Millspaugh J. J., Merchant J. W., Volesky J. D. 2010: Resource Selection by Elk in an Agro-Forested Landscape of Northwestern Nebraska. Environ Manage, 46: 725-737.

9 

Biro Z., Szemethy L., Katona K., Heltai M., Peto Z. 2006: Seasonal distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a forest-agriculture habitat in Hungary. Mammalia, 70: 70-75.

10 

Borkowski J., Ukalska J. 2008: Winter habitat use by red and roe deer in pine-dominated forest. For Ecol Manage, 255: 468-475.

11 

Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R. 2002: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference - A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer-Verlag, 488 p., New York.

12 

Campbell D., Swanson G. M., Sales J. 2004: Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. J Appl Ecol, 41: 1185-1196.

13 

Conradt L., Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E. 2000: Sex differences in weather sensitivity can cause habitat segregation: red deer as an example. Anim Behav, 59: 1049-1060.

14 

Cowled B. D., Giannini F., Beckett S. D., Woolnough A., Barry S., Randall L., Garner G. 2009: Feral pigs: predicting future distributions. Wildlife Res, 36: 242-251.

15 

Cross P., Heisey D. M., Scurlock B. M., Edwards W. H., Ebinger M. R., Brennan A. 2010: Mapping Brucellosis Increases Relative to Elk Density Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models, PLoS One, 5.

16 

Csányi S., Carranza J., Pokorny B., Putman R., Ryan M. 2014: Valuing ungulates in Europe, Behaviour and Management of European Ungulates, Whittles Publishing, 304, Dunbeath.

17 

Čampa L. 1986: Poškodbe mlajših smrekovih monokultur po divjadi na Pohorju ter izdelava metodologije za obnovo prizadetih sestojev, Inštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvo, 124 p., Ljubljana.

18 

Debeljak M., Dzeroski S., Jerina K., Kobler A., Adamic M. 2001: Habitat suitability modelling for red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in South-central Slovenia with classification trees, Ecol Model, 138: 321-330.

19 

Diaci J. 2006: Gojenje gozdov: pragozdovi, sestoji, zvrsti, načrtovanje, izbrana poglavja, Univerzitetni učbenik, Univerza v Ljubljani, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire, 348 p., Ljubljana.

20 

Dormann C. F., McPherson J. M., Araujo M. B., Bivand R., Bolliger J., Carl G., Davies R. G., Hirzel A., Jetz W., Kissling W. D., Kuhn I., Ohlemuller R., Peres-Neto P. R., Reineking B., Schroder B., Schurr F. M., Wilson R. 2007: Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography, 30: 609-628.

21 

Ferretti F., Mattioli S. 2012: The Mesola red deer: present numbers and conservation perspectives, Hystrix, 23: 35-43.

22 

Figgins G., Holland P. 2012: Red deer in New Zealand: Game animal, economic resource or environmental pest?, N Z Geogr, 68: 36-48.

23 

Gerhardt P., Arnold J. M., Hackländer K., Hochbichler E. 2013: Determinants of deer impact in European forests - A systematic literature analysis, For Ecol Manage, 310: 173-186.

24 

Gill R. M. A. 1992: A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests 1: Deer, Forestry, 65: 145-169.

25 

Godvik I. M. R., Loe L. E., Vik J. O., Veiberg V., Langvatn R., Mysterud A. 2009: Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection, Ecology, 90: 699-710.

26 

Gude J. A., Cunningham J. A., Herbert J. T., Baumeister T. 2012: Deer and elk hunter recruitment, retention, and participation trends in Montana, J Wildl Manage, 76: 471-479.

27 

Hebblewhite M., Pletscher D. H., Paquet P. C. 2002: Elk population dynamics in areas with and without predation by recolonizing wolves in Banff National Park, Alberta, Can J Zool, 80: 789-799.

28 

Heinze E., Boch S., Fischer M., Hessenmöller D., Klenk B., Müller J., Prati D., Schulze E.-D., Seele C., Socher S., Halle S. 2011: Habitat use of large ungulates in northeastern Germany in relation to forest management, For Ecol Manage, 261: 288-296.

29 

Heurich M., Brand T. T. G., Kaandorp M. Y., Šustr P., Müller J., Reineking B. 2015: Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?, PLoS One, 10: 1-17.

30 

Hines A. M., Ezenwa V. O., Cross P., Rogerson J. D. 2007: Effects of supplemental feeding on gastrointestinal parasite infection in elk (Cervus elaphus): Preliminary observations, Vet Parasitol, 148: 350-355.

31 

Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S., Sturdivant R. X. 2013: Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd Edition, Blackwell Science Publ, 1-500, Oxford.

32 

Iain J. G., Herbert H. T. P. 2008: The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p., Berlin.

33 

Imperio S., Ferrante M., Grignetti A., Santini G., Focardi S. 2010: Investigating population dynamics in ungulates: Do hunting statistics make up a good index of population abundance?, Wildlife Biol, 16: 205-214.

34 

Iravani M., Schutz M., Edwards P. J., Risch A. C., Scheidegger C., Wagner H. H. 2011: Seed dispersal in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) dung and its potential importance for vegetation dynamics in subalpine grasslands, Basic Appl Ecol, 12: 505-515.

35 

Jakša 2011: Navodila za usmerjanje razvoja populacij divjadi v Sloveniji, Zavod za gozdove Slovenije, 34 p., Ljubljana.

36 

Jakša 2012: Vektorska karta gozdnih sestojev v Sloveniji, Zavod za gozdove Slovenije, Ljubljana.

37 

Jedrzejewski W., Schmidt K., Theuerkauf J., Jedrzejewska B., Selva N., Zub K., Szymura L. 2002: Kill rates and predation by wolves on ungulate populations in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland), Ecology, 83: 1341-1356.

38 

Jerina K. 2006a: Prostorska razporeditev, območja aktivnosti in telesna masa jelenjadi (Cervus elaphus L.) glede na okoljske dejavnike, Doktorska disertacija Univerza v Ljubljani Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana.

39 

Jerina K. 2006b: Vplivi okoljskih dejavnikov na prostorsko razporeditev divjega prašiča (Sus scrofa L.) v Sloveniji, Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva, 81: 3-20.

40 

Jerina K. 2008: Velika rastlinojeda divjad in razvojna dinamika gozdnih ekosistemov: proučevanje vplivov izbranih okoljskih in populacijskih parametrov ter gozdno-gojitvenih sistemov na zmožnosti naravne obnove: zaključno poročilo o rezultatih opravljenega raziskovalnega dela na projektu v okviru ciljnega raziskovalnega projekta (CRP) "Konkurenčnost Slovenije 2006-2013", Doktorska disertacija Univerza v Ljubljani Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire, 27 p., Ljubljana.

41 

Jerina K. 2012: Roads and supplemental feeding affect home-range size of Slovenian red deer more than natural factors, J Mammal, 93: 1139-1148.

42 

Jerina K., Dajčman M., Adamič M. 2008: Red deer (Cervus elaphus) bark stripping on spruce with regard to spatial distribution of supplemental feeding places, Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva, 86: 33-43.

43 

Johnson D. H. 1980: The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference, Ecology, 61: 65-71.

44 

Kramer K., Bruinderink G., Prins H. H. T. 2006: Spatial interactions between ungulate herbivory and forest management, For Ecol Manage, 226: 238-247.

45 

Kuijper D. P. J., Cromsigt J. P. G. M., Churski M., Adam B., Jedrzejewska B., Jedrzejewski W. 2009: Do ungulates preferentially feed in forest gaps in European temperate forest?, For Ecol Manage, 258: 1528-1535.

46 

Lande U. S., Loe L. E., Skjaerli O. J., Meisingset E. L., Mysterud A. 2014: The effect of agricultural land use practice on habitat selection of red deer, Eur J Wildlife Res, 60: 69-76.

47 

Licoppe A. M. 2006: The diurnal habitat used by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Haute Ardenne, Eur J Wildlife Res, 52: 164-170.

48 

Lovari S., Cuccus P., Murgia A., Murgia C., Soi F., Plantamura G. 2007: Space use, habitat selection and browsing effects of red deer in Sardinia, Ital J Zool, 74: 179-189.

49 

Luccarini S., Mauri L., Ciuti S., Lamberti P., Apollonio M. 2006: Red deer (Cervus elaphus) spatial use in the Italian Alps: home range patterns, seasonal migrations, and effects of snow and winter feeding, Ethol Ecol Evol, 18: 127-145.

50 

Malo J. E., Suarez F. 1998: The dispersal of a dry-fruited shrub by red deer in a Mediterranean ecosystem, Ecography, 21: 204-211.

51 

Mansson J., Jarnemo A. 2013: Bark-stripping on Norway spruce by red deer in Sweden: level of damage and relation to tree characteristics, Scand J Forest Res, 28: 117-125.

52 

Marchiori E., Sturaro E., Ramanzin M. 2012: Wild red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) grazing may seriously reduce forage production in mountain meadows, Ital J Anim Sci, 11.

53 

Mayor S. J., Schneider D. C., Schaefer J. A., Mahoney S. P. 2009: Habitat selection at multiple scales, Ecoscience, 16: 238-247.

54 

Meisingset E. L., Loe L. E., Brekkum O., Van Moorter B., Mysterud A. 2013: Red deer habitat selection and movements in relation to roads, J Wildl Manage, 77: 181-191.

55 

Merli E., Meriggi A. 2006: Using harvest data to predict habitat-population relationship of the wild boar Sus scrofa in Northern Italy, Acta Theriol, 51: 383-394.

56 

Milner J. M., Van Beest F. M., Schmidt K. T., Brook R. K., Storaas T. 2014: To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates, J Wildl Manage, 78: 1322-1334.

57 

Mohr D., Cohnstaedt L. W., Topp W. 2005: Wild boar and red deer affect soil nutrients and soil biota in steep oak stands of the Eifel, Soil Biol Biochem, 37: 693-700.

58 

Morellet N., Klein F., Solberg E., Andersen R. 2011: The census and management of populations of ungulates in Europe, Ungulate Management in Europe - Problems and Practices, Cambridge University Press, 106-143, New York.

59 

Mysterud A., Askilsrud H., Loe L. E., Veiberg V. 2010: Spatial patterns of accumulated browsing and its relevance for management of red deer Cervus elaphus, Wildlife Biol, 16: 162-172.

60 

Mysterud A., Langvatn R., Yoccoz N. G., Stenseth N. C. 2002: Large-scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer populations in Norway, J Anim Ecol, 71: 569-580.

61 

Nahlik A. 1995: Browsing pressure caused by red deer and moufflon under various population densities in different forest ecosystems of Hungary; effects of supplementary winter feeding, Symposium on Ungulates in Temperate Forest Ecosystems, 23-27, April 1995 Wageningen.

62 

Neff D. J. 1968: The Pellet-Group Count Technique for Big Game Trend, Census, and Distribution: A Review, J Wildl Manage, 32: 597-614.

63 

Ogrin D. 1996: Podnebni tipi v Sloveniji. The climate types in Slovenia, Geografski vestnik, 68: 39-56.

64 

Oheimb v. G., Schmidt M., Kriebitzsch W. U., Ellenberg H. 2005: Dispersal of vascular plants by game in northern Germany. Part II: Red deer (Cervus elaphus), Eur J For Res, 124: 55-65.

65 

Palmer S. C. F., Broadhead J. E., Ross I., Smith D. E. 2007: Long-term habitat use and browsing by deer in a Caledonian pinewood, For Ecol Manage, 242: 273-280.

66 

Perez-Barberia F. J., Hooper R. J., Gordon I. J. 2013: Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus), Oecologia, 173: 837-847.

67 

Perez-Gonzalez J., Barbosa A. M., Carranza J., Torres-Porras J. 2010: Relative Effect of Food Supplementation and Natural Resources on Female Red Deer Distribution in a Mediterranean Ecosystem, J Wildl Manage, 74: 1701-1708.

68 

Prien S. 1997: Interierte Maßnahmen zur Einschränkung der Wildschäden im Walde, Wildschäden im Wald: Ökologische Grundlagen und integrierte Schutzmaßnahmen. , 1. Auflage Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, 159-222, Berlin, Wien.

69 

Putman R. J. 1989: Introduction: mammals as Pests, Mammals as pests, Chapman and Hall, 1-20, London, New York.

70 

Putman R. J. 1996: Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: Perspectives and recommendations for future research, For Ecol Manage, 88: 205-214.

71 

Putman R. J., Staines B. W. 2004: Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness, Mammal Rev, 34: 285-306.

72 

Reimoser F., Gossow H. 1996: Impact of ungulates on forest vegetation and its dependence on the silvicultural system, For Ecol Manage, 88: 107-119.

73 

Reinecke H., Leinen L., Thissen I., Meissner M., Herzog S., Schutz S., Kiffner C. 2014: Home range size estimates of red deer in Germany: environmental, individual and methodological correlates, Eur J Wildlife Res, 60: 237-247.

74 

Rodriguez-Hidalgo P., Gortazar C., Tortosa S. F., Rodriguez-Vigal C., Fierro Y., Vicente J. 2010: Effects of density, climate, and supplementary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red deer in Spain, Oecologia, 164: 389-398.

75 

Scandura M., Apollonio M., Šprem N. 2014: Reintroductions as a management tool for European ungulates Behaviour and Management of European Ungulates, Whittles Publishing, 46-77, Dunbeath.

76 

Schmidt K. T. 1992: Winter ecology of nonmigratory Alpine red deer, Oecologia, 95: 226-233.

77 

Schmidt K. T. 1992: Uber den Einfluss von Futterung und Jagd auf das Raum-Zeit-Verhalten von Rotwild, Z Jagdwiss, 38: 88-100.

78 

Schmidt K. T., Gossow H. 1991: Winter ecology of alpine red deer with and without supplemental feeding: management implications, Proceeding of XXth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, 1991, 180-185.

79 

Schmitz O. J. 1990: Management implications of foraging theory - evaluating deer supplemental feeding, J Wildl Manage, 54: 522-532.

80 

Schoenecker K. A., Singer F. J., Menezes R. S. C., Zeigenfuss L. C., Binkley D. 2002: Sustainability of vegetation communities grazed by elk in Rocky Mountain National Park, Report, 187-204, Fort Collins, CO.

81 

Scurlock B. M., Edwards W. H. 2010: Status of brucellosis in free-ranging elk and bison in Wyoming, J Wildl Dis, 46: 442-449.

82 

Seivwright L. J. 1996: The influence of supplementary winter feeding on the social behaviour of red deer (Cervus elaphus), BSc (Hons) Thesis, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.

83 

Sinclair A. R. E., Fryxell J. M., Caughley G. 2005: Wildlife Ecology, Conservation and Management, 2nd Edition Blackwell Publishing, 488 p., Malden.

84 

Smietana W., Klimek A. 1993: Diet of wolves in the Bieszczady mountains, Poland, Acta Theriol, 38: 245-251.

85 

Smit C., Putman R. 2011: Large herbivores as ‘environmental engineers’, Ungulate management in Europe, Cambridge University Press, 260-283 New York.

86 

Stergar M. 2005: Objedenost mladja drevesnih vrst v odvisnosti od zgradbe sestoja, Univerza v Ljubljani, BF, Oddelek za gozdarstvo, Ljubljana.

87 

Stergar M., Borkovič D., Hiršelj J., Kavčič I., Krofel M., Mrakič M., Troha R., Videmšek U., Vrčon B., Jerina K. 2012: Ugotavljanje gostot prostoživečih parkljarjev s kombinirano metodo štetja kupčkov iztrebkov in podatkov o odvzemu = Estimation of wild ungulate densities with a combined method of pellet group counting and removal data, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire, 18 p., Ljubljana.

88 

Stergar M., Jonozovič M., Jerina K. 2009: Območja razširjenosti in relativne gostote avtohtonih vrst parkljarjev v Sloveniji, Gozdarski vestnik, 67: 367-380.

89 

Stewart K. M., Bowyer R. T., Kie J. G., Hurley M. A. 2010: Spatial Distributions of Mule Deer and North American Elk: Resource Partitioning in a Sage-Steppe Environment, Am Midl Nat, 163: 400-412.

90 

Storms D., Said S., Fritz H., Hamann J. L., Saint-Andrieux C., Klein F. 2006: Influence of hurricane Lothar on red and roe deer winter diets in the Northern Vosges, France, For Ecol Manage, 237: 164-169.

91 

Tate R. F. 1954: Correlation Between a Discrete and a Continuous Variable - Point-Biserial Correlation, Ann Math Stat, 25: 603-607.

92 

Ueckermann E. 1983: Die Auswirkung verschiedener Futterkomponenten auf den Schälumfang des Rotwildes, Z Jagdwiss, 29: 31-47.

93 

Ueda H., Takatsuki S., Takahashi Y. 2002: Bark stripping of hinoki cypress by sika deer in relation to snow cover and food availability on Mt Takahara, central Japan, Ecol Res, 17: 545-551.

94 

Ueno M., Solberg E. J., Iijima H., Rolandsen C. M., Gangsei L. E. 2014: Performance of hunting statistics as spatiotemporal density indices of moose (Alces alces) in Norway, Ecosphere, 5: 1-20.

95 

Verheyden H., Ballon P., Bernard V., Saint-Andrieux C. 2006: Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe, Mammal Rev, 36: 217-234.

96 

Virjent Š., Jerina K. 2004: Osrednji slovenski register velike lovne divjadi in velikih zveri v sklopu novega lovsko-informacijskega sistema, Lovec, 86: 280-281.

97 

Völk F. H. 1999: Bedeutung von Waldstruktur und Rotwildhege für die Schälhäufigkeit in den alpinen Bundesländern Österreichs, Z Jagdwiss, 45: 1-16.

98 

Vospernik S. 2006: Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Austria, Silva Fenn, 40: 589-601.

99 

Weis G. B. 1997: Anlage und Pflege von Wildäsungsflächen, Nimrod-Verlag, 320 p., Oldenburg.

100 

Weisberg P. J., Bugmann H. 2003: Forest dynamics and ungulate herbivory: from leaf to landscape, For Ecol Manage, 181: 1-12.

101 

Wiersema G. J. 1974: Observations on the supplementary winter feeding of red deer on an estate in the central highlands of Scotland, MSc Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen.

102 

Zuur A., Ieno E. N., Walker N., Saveliev A. A., Smith G. M. 2009: Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R, Springer Science & Business Media, 574 p., New York.

103 

Zweifel-Schielly B., Kreuzer M., Ewald K. C., Suter W. 2009: Habitat selection by an Alpine ungulate: the significance of forage characteristics varies with scale and season, Ecography, 23: 103-113.

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 327 *