hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1

Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions

Rafal Urbaniak ; Ghent University and University of Gdansk

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (237 KB) str. 5-22 preuzimanja: 131* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Urbaniak, R. (2017). Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 13 (2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1
MLA 8th Edition
Urbaniak, Rafal. "Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions." European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, vol. 13, br. 2, 2017, str. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1. Citirano 23.04.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Urbaniak, Rafal. "Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions." European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13, br. 2 (2017): 5-22. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1
Harvard
Urbaniak, R. (2017). 'Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions', European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 13(2), str. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1
Vancouver
Urbaniak R. Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy [Internet]. 2017 [pristupljeno 23.04.2021.];13(2):5-22. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1
IEEE
R. Urbaniak, "Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions", European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, vol.13, br. 2, str. 5-22, 2017. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.1

Sažetak
I illustrate with three classical examples the mistakes arising from using a modal operator admitting multiple interpretations in the same argument; the flaws arise especially easily if no attention is paid to the range of propositional variables. Premisses taken separately might seem convincing and a substitution for a propositional variable in a modal context might seem legitimate. But there is no single interpretation of the modal operators involved under which all the premisses are plausible and the substitution successful.

Ključne riječi
Church-Fitch paradox; futura contingentia; modal logic; modal operators; propositional quantification; Swinburne’s modal argument

Hrčak ID: 203338

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/203338

Posjeta: 259 *