hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18

Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox

Aleksandar Hatzivelkos   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-7177 ; University of Applied Sciences Velika Gorica, Department of Mathematics, Velika Gorica, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (593 KB) str. 465-484 preuzimanja: 104* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Hatzivelkos, A. (2018). Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 16 (3-B), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18
MLA 8th Edition
Hatzivelkos, Aleksandar. "Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox." Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, vol. 16, br. 3-B, 2018, str. 465-484. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18. Citirano 12.11.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Hatzivelkos, Aleksandar. "Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox." Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 16, br. 3-B (2018): 465-484. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18
Harvard
Hatzivelkos, A. (2018). 'Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox', Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 16(3-B), str. 465-484. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18
Vancouver
Hatzivelkos A. Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems [Internet]. 2018 [pristupljeno 12.11.2019.];16(3-B):465-484. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18
IEEE
A. Hatzivelkos, "Borda and Plurality Comparison with Regard to Compromise as a Sorites Paradox", Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, vol.16, br. 3-B, str. 465-484, 2018. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.18

Sažetak
Social choice decision aggregation is a form of complex system modelling which is based upon voters’ rankings over a set of candidates. Different social choice functions, such as Borda count, plurality count or Condorcet methods models different aspects of social choice decision criteria. One of such criteria which has not been fully described or modelled, is the notion of compromise. This article aims to define a measure which would capture the notion of compromise on a given profile of voter preferences, about certain candidate being appointed to a certain position by a certain social welfare function. The goal is to define what compromise should mean, and proposes the so called “d measure of divergence” as a measure of divergence for some candidate to be positioned to a certain position. This study compares the results of two well established social welfare functions, Borda and plurality count d-measure of divergence.

Ključne riječi
Borda count; plurality count; compromise

Projekti
HRZZ / UIP / UIP-2017-05-9219 / FORMALS - Formalno rasuđivanje i semantike

Hrčak ID: 206478

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/206478

Posjeta: 169 *