hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

Ecological Behavior and Ethos of Responsibility

Ivan Cifrić ; Odsjek za sociologiju, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Ivana Lučića 3,10 000 Zagreb

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (1 MB) str. 345-360 preuzimanja: 152* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Cifrić, I. (2018). Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti. Socijalna ekologija, 27 (3), 345-360. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867
MLA 8th Edition
Cifrić, Ivan. "Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 27, br. 3, 2018, str. 345-360. https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867. Citirano 29.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Cifrić, Ivan. "Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti." Socijalna ekologija 27, br. 3 (2018): 345-360. https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867
Harvard
Cifrić, I. (2018). 'Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti', Socijalna ekologija, 27(3), str. 345-360. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867 (Datum pristupa: 29.11.2020.)
Vancouver
Cifrić I. Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 2018 [pristupljeno 29.11.2020.];27(3):345-360. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867
IEEE
I. Cifrić, "Ekološko ponašanje i etos odgovornosti", Socijalna ekologija, vol.27, br. 3, str. 345-360, 2018. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867. [Citirano: 29.11.2020.]

Sažetak
There has been an empirical research of the students of four faculties at the University of Zagreb (1997; N=685) on "ecological behavior".
The highest percentage of respondents practices these "ways" of ecological behavior: selection and recycling (74%), buying of ecological products (62%), saving of electricity and water (41%). Considerably smaller number of respondents supports ecological manifestations (23%), reads ecological literature (17%) or is a member of some ecological association (2%).
By means of multivariate analysis two "types" of ecologic behavior have been established: "practical" and "manifest" ecologic activism.
The relationship between ecologic behavior and (a) four ethos-types (anthropocentrism, utilitarianism, biocentrism and holism), (b) sovereignty over natural goods and (c) the right to life space have been analyzed. Statistically relevant differences between holistic and egocentric ethos type have been established as well.
The author concludes that the advocates of holistic ethos-type, the advocates of limiting the sovereignty over natural goods and the advocates of equal rights of all species to life space are much more inclined towards "practical ecologic activism".

Ključne riječi
ecological behavior; ecological ethics; rights of species to life space; sovereignty over natural goods; students

Hrčak ID: 219867

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/219867

[hrvatski] [njemački]

Posjeta: 265 *