APA 6th Edition Cvijanović, H. (2006). Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu. Politička misao, 43 (3), 39-55. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437
MLA 8th Edition Cvijanović, Hrvoje. "Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu." Politička misao, vol. 43, br. 3, 2006, str. 39-55. https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437. Citirano 01.03.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Cvijanović, Hrvoje. "Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu." Politička misao 43, br. 3 (2006): 39-55. https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437
Harvard Cvijanović, H. (2006). 'Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu', Politička misao, 43(3), str. 39-55. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437 (Datum pristupa: 01.03.2021.)
Vancouver Cvijanović H. Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu. Politička misao [Internet]. 2006 [pristupljeno 01.03.2021.];43(3):39-55. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437
IEEE H. Cvijanović, "Modus vivendi: koncepcija suživota u pluralističkom globalnom društvu", Politička misao, vol.43, br. 3, str. 39-55, 2006. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20437. [Citirano: 01.03.2021.]
Sažetak Modus vivendi is Gray’s political concept which he links to
Hobbes’ political theory whose purpose is to temporarily establish the
coexistence of intransigent sides i.e ways of life. In other words,
modus vivendi is a solution aimed at limiting the scope of political insecurity in plural societies by providing the minimal content of coexistence.
Since this is offered as a potential solution for contemporary
societies marked by value-pluralist conflicts, the author looks into the
probability of the successfulness of the modus vivendi concept of coexistence.
The fact is that the modus vivendi has been criticized to be
a concept that generates problems it does not provide answers to,
such as the issue of stability and morality/justice. In Hobess’ traditional interpretation which Gray adopted, these are not the questions that the pluralist modus vivendi approach should provide answers for.
The author, however, has adopted the argument according to which
Hobbes and Rawls insist on an immediate political goal i.e. stability
(peace) and justice. Gray’s modus vivendi follows Hobbes´ blueprint
of the state of commodious life. The best example of common institutions created on assumption of modus vivendi toleration is European Union.