hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7

Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj

Joanna Baginska   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-5563 ; Zavod za stomatološku propedeutiku Medicinskog sveučilišta Bialystok, Poljska
Ewa Rodakowska ; Zavod za restaurativnu stomatologiju Medicinskog sveučilišta Bialystok, Poljska
Agnieszka Kobus   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-8958 ; Zavod za stomatološku propedeutiku Medicinskog sveučilišta Bialystok, Poljska
Jacek Jamiołowski ; Zavod za populacijsku medicine i preventivne bolesti Medicinskog sveučilišta Bialystok, Poljska
Anna Kierklo ; Zavod za stomatološku propedeutiku Medicinskog sveučilišta Bialystok, Poljska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (206 KB) str. 150-157 preuzimanja: 31* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Baginska, J., Rodakowska, E., Kobus, A., Jamiołowski, J. i Kierklo, A. (2019). Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 53 (2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Baginska, Joanna, et al. "Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 53, br. 2, 2019, str. 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7. Citirano 17.11.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Baginska, Joanna, Ewa Rodakowska, Agnieszka Kobus, Jacek Jamiołowski i Anna Kierklo. "Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj." Acta stomatologica Croatica 53, br. 2 (2019): 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
Harvard
Baginska, J., et al. (2019). 'Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 53(2), str. 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
Vancouver
Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Jamiołowski J, Kierklo A. Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 17.11.2019.];53(2):150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
IEEE
J. Baginska, E. Rodakowska, A. Kobus, J. Jamiołowski i A. Kierklo, "Stajališta i znanja školskih medicinskih sestara o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida u Poljskoj", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.53, br. 2, str. 150-157, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (206 KB) str. 150-157 preuzimanja: 31* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Baginska, J., Rodakowska, E., Kobus, A., Jamiołowski, J. i Kierklo, A. (2019). Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment . Acta stomatologica Croatica, 53 (2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
MLA 8th Edition
Baginska, Joanna, et al. "Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment ." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 53, br. 2, 2019, str. 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7. Citirano 17.11.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Baginska, Joanna, Ewa Rodakowska, Agnieszka Kobus, Jacek Jamiołowski i Anna Kierklo. "Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment ." Acta stomatologica Croatica 53, br. 2 (2019): 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
Harvard
Baginska, J., et al. (2019). 'Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment ', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 53(2), str. 150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
Vancouver
Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Jamiołowski J, Kierklo A. Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment . Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 17.11.2019.];53(2):150-157. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7
IEEE
J. Baginska, E. Rodakowska, A. Kobus, J. Jamiołowski i A. Kierklo, "Polish School Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge towards Topical Fluoride Treatment ", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.53, br. 2, str. 150-157, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/7

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Cilj: Željelo se procijeniti mišljenje školskih medicinskih sestara u Poljskoj o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida te njihovo znanje o sigurnosti toga kemijskog spoja. Metoda: U presječnom istraživanju s pomoću anketnog upitnika sudjelovale su 164 školske medicinske sestre. Anketa je obuhvaćala raniju izobrazbu o prevenciji karijesa, mjere poduzete u školama kako bi se prevenirao karijes, suradnju s doktorima dentalne medicine, mišljenje o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida te znanja sestara o njihovoj sigurnosti. Rezultati: Oralno zdravlje bilo je uvršteno u dužnost 93,9 % sestara, a 81,7 % provodilo je lokalnu primjenu fluorida. U izobrazbi o oralnoj problematici nikada nije sudjelovalo njih 52,1 %. Sestre iz gradova češće su sudjelovale i održavale predavanja o prevenciji karijesa i o fluoridima od svojih kolegica u manjim gradovima (p = 0,033 i 0,021 – hi-kvadrat test). Sestre su imale pozitivno stajalište o učinkovitosti i sigurnosti topikalne primjene fluorida. Samo je polovina ispitanica znala za moguću toksičnu dozu, a jedna petina nije znala kolika je koncentracija fluora u gelu. Ta su znanja bila statistički važna, ovisno o razini izobrazbe pojedine sestre (p = 0,019 – Kruskal-Wallisov test). One s niskom razinom znanja nisu bile svjesne moguće štetnosti fluorida te su imale negativno stajalište o učinkovitosti programa fluoridacije u školama. Zaključak: Školske medicinske sestre u Poljskoj imale su pozitivno mišljenje o topikalnoj primjeni fluorida. No, ima manjkavosti u njihovu znanju pa im je potrebna institucionalizirana izobrazba.

Ključne riječi
školske medicinske sestre, topikalna primjena fluorida, znanja

Hrčak ID: 220905

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/220905

▼ Article Information



Introduction

Dental caries is the most widespread disease in the world (1). Even though a continuous decrease in caries prevalence and experience in Polish children is observed, these levels are still very high (2). This disease has a great impact on child’s life, results in lowering the quality of life, and generates many economic costs (3, 4). As caries is a lifestyle disease, the measures to prevent cavity development should be taken from the childhood. There are three main subject areas within the scope of oral health promotion, including oral hygiene, proper nutrition and the use of fluoride compounds.

Fluoride (F) has been the most efficient caries preventive agent responsible for the decline in dental caries over the last decades (5). The mechanism of its actions is multidirectional. Fluoride reduces dental plaque formation, inhibits enolase resulting in a decrease in the level of glycolytic intermediates, affects bacterial cellular membrane permeability, inhibits demineralization and increases remineralization. If F is present in the biofilm environment and the pH is not lower than 5.5, the dissolution of hydroxyapatite (HA) promotes the Fluor apatite (FA) formation. Repeated cycles of demineralization and remineralization make the outer parts of enamel more resistant to acidic environment (5, 6). Fluoride can be delivered to the organism orally and topically. Using fluoride toothpaste twice a day is considered to be a basic caries-preventive strategy. Apart from daily hygiene routine, the home-used or professionally-applied high concentration topical agents should be used in high risk populations (7). The application of a high concentration of F ions results in the calcium fluoride-like globules formation on the tooth surface. They are mineral reservoirs releasing calcium, phosphate and fluoride after acid attacks (8). For professional application the gels, foams and varnishes with a concentration between 0.5 and 5% are recommended. Currently, the indications for fluoride prophylaxis and the frequency of application depend on the individual caries risk; fluoride applications are recommended in individuals with a moderate and high caries risk (7).

Despite its positive effect on teeth, fluoride may cause an acute and chronic toxicity. An overexposure to small doses during first years of life results in enamel development disturbances named fluorosis. People living in areas where the fluoride level in drinking water is above 1.5 mg/l (1.5 ppm) are exposed to fluorosis. Currently, multiple sources of fluoride exposure, e.g. fluoride-containing dental products, fluoride enriched food and water are considered to be a reason for a growing number of children with fluorosis symptoms (9, 10). Potentially, a harmful effect may result from a daily ingestion of topical fluoride, from toothpaste or from home use gels. An acute poisoning may occur after the ingestion of one or more doses of fluoride over a short time period. First symptoms are nausea, abdominal pain, bloody vomiting and diarrhea. They are followed by headache, cardiac arrhythmia, excess salivation, collapse with paleness, weakness, wet, cold skin, shallow breathing, spasms, muscle paralysis, and tetany. The abovementioned symptoms are an effect of metabolic disorders, mainly hypocalcaemia, hyperkalemia and acidosis. Acute fluoride toxicity often results in death (11). In children, first signs of poisoning may occur after the ingestion of 1-5 mg/kg of fluorides (probable toxic dose, PTD), and the lethal dose (LD) is calculated to be between 8 and 16 mg/kg (10, 11). Even though the cases of acute fluoride poisoning are very rare nowadays (12), the possibility of overdose due to unsupervised ingestion of dental products still exists (11).

It has been proven that school/kindergarten-based programs for caries prevention with topical fluoride are cost-effective, with a high ratio of caries reduction (13-15). In Poland, since 2004, a fluoride program funded by the National Health System (NHS) for all children attending primary schools has been available. The procedures are performed in classes 1 to 6, six times in a school year (every 6 weeks) with the method of supervised toothbrushing using a 1.25% gel. The prevention is provided in areas where the fluoride levels in drinking water exceed 1 mg/l. Joining the program requires a written parental consent. The procedure is supervised by a school nurse or school hygienist. Therefore, school nurses play an important role in caries prevention with topical fluoride in Poland, but little is known about their opinions about this program as well as their knowledge in this area. The purpose of this study was to evaluate school nurses’ opinions on the topical fluoride treatment and their knowledge of acute fluoride toxicity.

Material and methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study with the use of a self-administered questionnaire was conducted from January to April 2014 on randomly selected school nurses. The survey concerned several aspects of the role of school nurse in maintaining oral health in pupils, e.g. caries prevention and first aid in dental trauma. The protocol of the study was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.

Study population

Three hundred and thirty-three school nurses were selected from the internet database of the Central Statistical Office of Poland. The following assumptions were made to establish the minimum sample size for the evaluation of the role of school nurses in caries prevention: the number of school nurses based on data from the Polish Ministry of Health to be about 8,000, the percentage of nurses whose duties include the application of topical fluoride (estimated sample size) based on a pilot study to be 95%, the confidence level 95%, maximum error 5%. The minimum sample size was estimated to be 72 nurses. All participants received a questionnaire with a pre-paid return envelope, notes on the aim of the study and a participation consent form.

Questionnaire

A structured self-administrative questionnaire was tested in a pilot study on 37 school nurses. After the pilot study, one question about the time of eruption of primary and permanent teeth was removed because it was not relevant to the study. The final questionnaire comprised questions concerning the duration of employment as school nurse, the education level, the work location type, previous training on caries prevention, actions taken at school, and cooperation with dentists. The questionnaire contained also a part concerning the topical fluoride application program; this part was completed by the nurses who accomplished the NHS program. Questions regarded the percentage of pupils having fluoride prophylaxis, their opinion about the effectiveness and safety of fluoride application and 5 questions evaluating nurse’s knowledge of fluoride toxicity. The knowledge was assessed by counting points for every correct answer. Due to two questions in multiple response type, the maximum number of points was 12.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistica 12.0. The Kruskal-Wallis and Chi square tests with the level of statistical significance at p<0.05 were used.

Results

Since 164 nurses responded to the survey, the response rate for this study was 49.25%. The duration of employment as school nurse varied (from 1 year to 43 years), but the majority of nurses had a long experience, with the average period of 23±9.1. A large number of respondents had secondary education; only 39 (23.8%) persons had a university degree - there were 20 nurses with a Bachelor’s degree and 19 with a Master’s degree. The location of nurses’ working place was as follows: city over 100 000 – 45 (27.4%), town up to 100 000 – 70 (42.7%), town up to 20 000 – 28 (17.1%) and village – 14 (8.5%). Six nurses did not answer the question about their education and seven missed the question about the working place.

Only 10 (6.1%) nurses declared that oral health was not included in their duties and for 71 (43.3%) subjects dental issues took a substantial part of their practice. They were as follows: lectures on caries prevention (135, 81.8%), topical fluoride applications (134, 81.2%), oral hygiene instructions (124, 75.1%), lectures on dental trauma prevention and screening for caries and malocclusion (7, 4.2%). A statistical analysis revealed that nurses working at schools located in big cities and villages more often than those from towns provided lectures on caries prevention and topical fluoride applications (respectively p=0.033 and p=0.021, chi2 test). Almost all respondents (95.6%) declared that pupils asked them for advice in the case of such dental problems as toothache, gum bleeding or halitosis. The statistical analysis showed that children from schools located in villages more often asked for such help than their colleagues from towns and cities (p= 0.025, chi2 test). Only 40 nurses (24.4%) established the cooperation with a dentist. Such cooperation was most frequently declared by nurses from small towns (31.4%) and most seldom by respondents from villages (10.9%), however, the results were not statistically significant. More than a half of the respondents (86, 52.4%) never attended any training concerning caries prevention. There were no differences depending on nurse education and location of school.

In the evaluated group, 134 (81.7%) nurses accomplished the NHS program for topical fluoride application in pupils. They assumed the percentage of children taking part in this program to be from 40% to 100%, on average 90.25%. Generally, nurses had a positive opinion on the effectiveness of fluoride application: 39 (29.1%) of them noticed a great value of such program and 84 (62.7%) considered its effects to be sufficient. Only 7 (5.2%) subjects thought the program did not have any influence on pupils’ dentition, and 4 (3%) nurses did not have any opinion. They also had a positive opinion on the safety of topical fluoride application. 99 (73.9%) respondents correctly answered that this method was safe subject to proper procedures and (20.2%) considered it to be totally safe. There were only 6 (4.4%) subjects who had any doubts about it, and 4 (3%) nurses were convinced that the methods involved a great risk of overexposure to fluoride.

The evaluation of nurses’ knowledge of fluoride acute toxicity revealed some gaps (Table 1). They had problems with choosing all symptoms of fluoride poisoning and proper first aid measures in acute fluoride toxicity. Only a half of the respondents knew the probable toxic dose of fluoride and almost one fifth of the respondents did not know the concentration of fluoride in gel they used. The average number of points obtained by the nurses was 6.29±2.6. The statistical analysis showed that the nurses with secondary education had a significantly lower level of knowledge (5.9±2.55) than the respondents with higher education, respectively Bachelor’s and Master’s degree, 7.29±3 and 7.6±2.16 (p=0.019, the Kruskal-Wallis test). There were no differences in the level of knowledge depending on location of school and participation in training on caries prevention (Tab. 2). However, the knowledge was associated with nurses’ opinions about the effectiveness and safety of fluoride treatment. Nurses who were not aware of a potential harmful effect of fluoride and those with a negative opinion about the effectiveness of the fluoride program at school had a statistically significantly lower level of knowledge (Table 2).

Table 1 Percentage of nurses who correctly answered to questions about fluoride toxicity.
Question N (134) %
Do you know the level of fluoride in drinking water in your area?
yes 77 57.5
Which are real symptoms of acute fluoride toxicity?*
Nausea, vomiting 111 82.8
Abdominal pain 101 75.4
Excess salivation 59 44
Headache 40 29.9
Cardiac arrhythmia 58 43.3
Tetany 36 26.9
What is the first aid procedure in acute fluoride toxicity?*
Giving milk 60 44.8
Inducing vomiting 47 35.1
Quick referral to hospital 75 56
What is a PTD in children
1-5 mg/kg 69 51.5
What is the content of fluorides in gel for topical use?
12.5 mg/1g 110 82.1

* multiple-response question.

Table 2 Factors influencing nurses’ knowledge.
No. of points (SD) p*
Education 0.019
secondary 5.9 (2.55)
Bachelor’s degree 7.29 (3.0)
Master’s degree 7.6 (2.16)
Location of school 0.063
city 5.3 (2.59)
town up to 100 000 6.39 (2.77)
town up to 20 000 6.68 (2.54)
village 7.36 (2.02)
Training on caries prevention 0.984
yes 6.19 (2.04)
no 6.43 (2.63)
don’t remember 5.5 (0.7)
Opinion about the effectiveness of topical fluoride treatment 0.879
very efficient 6.31 (2.76)
sufficient 6.32 (2.33)
without any influence 5.57 (2.22)
no opinion 6.38 (3.71)
Opinion about safety of topical fluoride treatment <0.000
totally safe 4.47(2.02)
safe subject to proper procedures 6.85(2.54)
doubts about safety 5.83(3.12)
great risk of overexposure to fluorides 6.0 (3.46)

* Kruskal-Wallis test

Discussion

Apart from home, healthy behaviors should also be introduced and developed at school. A motivating influence of school with regard to oral health also reaches, through children, the families and local communities. School nurses may be promoters of oral health behaviors and providers of caries prophylaxis (16). Almost all investigated nurses included oral health topics in their duties. They discussed the role of hygiene and diet in caries development, instructed pupils how to brush teeth and provided the fluoride topical treatment. Moreover, almost a half of the respondents declared that caries prevention took a substantial part of their work time with pupils. Also children, especially from rural locations, felt that the school nurse was the appropriate person to ask for an oral health consultation.

The school-based oral hygiene programs may be effective in improving oral health (17, 18). Extensive evidence points to a high effectiveness in dental caries prevention by a regular use of fluoride preparations in the school environment, which was confirmed by the opinion of evaluated nurses. The advantages of such prevention include primarily an easy accessibility to the children and the possibility to regularly perform the procedures. The Polish school-based fluoride program is addressed to all children attending primary schools. However, the latest research by the Mother and Child Institute (19) revealed that a large group of school nurses (above 1/3) had difficulties in performing the fluoridation in pupils. Nurses most frequently report the reluctance of pupils to take part in the procedures (68.8%), difficulties in obtaining toothbrushes (52.9%), difficulties related to excusing pupils from class for the time of fluoridation (29.4%), difficulties resulting from the lack of place for the storage of toothbrushes (17%) (19). In our study, the mean percentage of pupils taking part in the program constituting more than 90% of the school population was significant. However, in several cases the nurses declared that less than a half of the pupils took part in the fluoridation. The refusal of parents to give consent to the participation of their child in caries preventions procedures at school may be due to numerous reasons: the lack of indication for fluoridation in individuals with a low risk of caries, the lack of parents’ awareness of advantages of this procedure, the lack of trust in public healthcare as well as the avoidance of preparations containing fluoride. According to the study of Hendaus et al. (20), many parents are not sure of the safety of fluoride preparations used in children. Therefore, it is important that the nurses are convinced of the safety of using fluoride prevention and are able to give explanations to parents being anxious about such procedures. It is particularly important in the context of numerous movements against the use of fluoride (21). In our study, less than 6% of nurses themselves had doubts about the safety of high concentration of fluorides. The majority of nurses correctly believed that the proper procedure guaranteed its safety.

In fact, the risk of hazardous effects of fluoride ingestion is very low in school-based programs, but the staff responsible for the application of gels or varnishes should be familiar with the symptoms of acute toxicity. We revealed the gap existing in this area. Many respondents did not know the level of fluoride in drinking water despite the fact that it is an important aspect of indications for the topical application of fluorides. In areas where the optimal level of fluoride in drinking water (0.8-1.2 ppm) is exceeded, there is no indication to apply fluorides topically. An acute fluoride poisoning has many symptoms, but evaluated nurses were not able to identify all of them. Moreover, less than a half of the respondents knew that the administration of milk is the first aid for a victim.

It has to be stressed that such gaps in knowledge could be expected. Golinveaux et al. (22) found that pediatric nurses were not able to correctly answer the questions related to the hazardous effect of fluoride ingestion. The lack of knowledge of fluorides was also found in dental staff, even in dentists (23, 24). It is obvious that nurses need to acquire knowledge to become competent and skilled to take action against caries. A study on pediatric nurses showed that gaps were improved by the interdisciplinary, multifaceted education (22). We found that the level of knowledge was dependent on education, to the disadvantage of respondents who did not have a university diploma. Unfortunately, most Polish school nurses have only secondary education. The lack of knowledge corresponded with the conviction of complete safety of fluorides in children, which may result in less supervision of the children during the procedure.

Our study revealed that the cooperation between school nurses and local dentists was insufficient and there was no obligatory training for them with regard to the application of topical fluorides and other aspects of caries prevention. It seems that it is time to call for action to prepare an educational program for school nurses to help them with their role as oral health promoters. New media such as the Internet can be used for the communication with nurses to save their time and effort.

Conclusion

Polish school nurses have the ability to incorporate oral health at the school setting. They have positive attitudes toward topical fluoride treatment in pupils. The gaps in their knowledge should be filled by increasing the education level and developing institutional training.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to express their gratitude to all participants for their time and effort during filling in the questionnaire and to the students from the Student Research Club ‘StuDentio’ at the Department of Dentistry Propaedeutics, Medical University of Bialystok, for their assistance in data collection.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest The authors report no conflict of interest

References

1 

Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):650–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740856

2 

Polish Ministry of Health [database on the Internet]. Monitorowanie stanu zdrowia jamy ustnej populacji polskiej w latach 2016--2020. Available from http://www.mz.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/monitoring-2016-2020.doc.

3 

Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey PA, Marcenes W. Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. J Dent Res. 2015 Oct;94(10):1355–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034515602879 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318590

4 

Pulache J, Abanto J, Oliveira LB, Bönecker M, Porras JC. Exploring the association between oral health problems and oral health-related quality of life in Peruvian 11- to 14-year-old children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(2):81–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12160 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25726961

5 

Buzalaf MA, Pessan JP, Honório HM, ten Cate JM. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries:control. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:97–114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000325151 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21701194

6 

Kanduti D, Sterbenk P, Artnik B. Fluoride: a review of use and effects on health. 2016;28(2):133–7.

7 

Weynat RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo T, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Donly KJ, Frese WA, et al. Topical fluoride for caries prevention. Executive summary of the updated clinical recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Nov;144(11):1279–91. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24177407

8 

Øgaard B. The cariostatic mechanism of fluoride. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999;20(1) Suppl:10–7. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11908400

9 

Denbesten P, Li W. Chronic fluoride toxicity: dental fluorosis. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:81–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327028 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21701193

10 

Clark MB, Slayton RL. Fluoride Use in Caries Prevention in the Primary Care Setting. Pediatrics. 2014;134(3):626–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1699 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25157014

11 

Whitford GM. Acute toxicity of ingested fluoride. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:66–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000325146 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21701192

12 

Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Chong LY. Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15; (6):CD002280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002280.pub2 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26075879

13 

Andruskeviciene V, Milciuviene S, Bendoraitiene E, Saldunaite K, Vasiliauskiene I, Slabsinskiene E, et al. Oral health status and effectiveness of caries prevention programme in kindergartens in Kaunas city (Lithuania). Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(4):343–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19178101

14 

Bergström EK, Lingström P, Hakeberg M, Gahnberg L, Sköld UM. Caries and costs: an evaluation of a school-based fluoride varnish programme for adolescents in a Swedish region. Community Dent Health. 2016 Jun;33(2):138–44. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27352469

15 

Hedman E, Gabre P, Birkhed D. Dental hygienists working in schools - a two-year oral health intervention programme in Swedish secondary schools. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(2):177–88. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24914429

16 

Buerlein J. Promoting children’s oral health. A role for school nurses in prevention, education, and coordination. NASN Sch Nurse. 2010 Jan;25(1):26–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1942602X09353053 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20440951

17 

Melvin CS. A collaborative community-based oral care program for school-age children. Clin Nurse Spec. 2006 Jan-Feb;20(1):18–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002800-200601000-00007 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569945

18 

Lai H, Fann JC, Yen AM, Chen LS, Lai MH, Chiu SY. Long-term effectiveness of school-based children oral hygiene program on oral health after 10-year follow-up. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44(3):209–15. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691608

19 

Oblacińska A, Jodkowska M, Ostręga W, Radiulkiewicz K, Stalmach M, Tabak I. Nowe problemy i wyzwania w profilaktycznej opiece zdrowotnej nad uczniami w szkole. Raport z badań ankietowych wśród pielęgniarek środowiska nauczania i wychowania w Polsce. [Monograph on the Internet]. Warszawa Instytut Matki i Dziecka. 2017. [cited 2017 Sept 30] Available from: http://www.moipip.org.pl/media/doc/aktualnosci/2017-03-08__raport_nowe_problemy_i_wyzwania_w_profilaktycznej_opiece_zdrowotnej_nad_uczniami_w_szkole.pdf.

20 

Hendaus MA, Jama HA, Siddiqui FJ, Elsiddig SA, Alhammadi AH. Parental preference for fluoride varnish: a new concept in a rapidly developing nation. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jul 13;10:1227–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S109269 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471379

21 

Ota J, Yamamoto T, Ando Y, Aida J, Hirata Y, Arai S. Dental health behaviour of parents of children using non-fluoride toothpaste: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2013 Dec 29;13:74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-13-74 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373715

22 

Golinveaux J, Gerbert B, Cheng J, Duderstadt K, Alkon A, Mullen S, et al. Oral Health Education for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Students. J Dent Educ. 2013 Jun;77(5):581–90. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658403

23 

Bansal R, Bolin KA, Abdellatif HM, Shulma JD. Knowledge, attitude and use of fluorides among dentists in Texas. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 May 1;13(3):371–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1153 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22918012

24 

Sharma A, Chopra R, Sachdeva S, Sachdev V. Knowledge attitude and practice of Indian dentists on topical application in children. J Dent Specialities. 2017;5(1):36–9.


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 100 *