Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1488600

Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: a review

Abbas Mardani ; Azman Hashim International Business School, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai Johor, Malaysia
Ahmad Jusoh ; Azman Hashim International Business School, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai Johor, Malaysia;
Katarzyna Halicka ; Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland
Joanna Ejdys ; Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland
Andrzej Magruk ; Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland
Ungku Norulkamar U. Ahmad ; Azman Hashim International Business School, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai Johor, Malaysia


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 4.425 Kb

str. 1666-1716

preuzimanja: 855

citiraj


Sažetak

The multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) utility-determining
techniques are considered to be new development techniques that
have been recently presented, extended and used by some scholars.
In the current work, an attempt is made to present a systematic
review of methodologies and applications of the MCDM utilitydetermining
techniques discussed in recent years. The researchers
reviewed 86 papers, describing the use of the MCDM utility-determining
techniques, which were published in the period 2004–2015
in more than 42 scientific journals. They mainly refer to the area of
management and are extracted from online databases, such as
Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. According to the classification
used by the researchers, the papers were grouped based
on the five main MCDM utility-determining techniques, including
stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), the weighted
aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS), the additive ratio
assessment (ARAS), the method of complex proportional assessment
(COPRAS), multi-objective optimisation by ratio analysis
(MOORA) and MULTIMOORA (MOORA plus a full multiplicative
form). Furthermore, the papers were categorised taking into
account their authors, publication date, journal name, the technique
and method used, research objectives, research gap and
problem, solution and modelling and, finally, the results and findings.
The results of this study show that, in 2013, scholars published
more papers on the MCDM utility-determining techniques
than in other years. It is also worth noting that a group of COPRAS
methods (COPRAS-Grey and COPRAS-Fuzzy) was ranked number
one among the methods used in this area. With regard to journals,
the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management was ranked first in
the list of journals, which contributed to this review.

Ključne riječi

ARAS; COPRAS; management; MCDM; MOORA and MULTIMOORA; SWARA; WASPAS

Hrčak ID:

221061

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/221061

Datum izdavanja:

3.12.2018.

Posjeta: 1.172 *