APA 6th Edition Jurak, K. (2019). Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta. Politička misao, 56 (2), 7-40. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01
MLA 8th Edition Jurak, Karlo. "Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta." Politička misao, vol. 56, br. 2, 2019, str. 7-40. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01. Citirano 27.02.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Jurak, Karlo. "Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta." Politička misao 56, br. 2 (2019): 7-40. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01
Harvard Jurak, K. (2019). 'Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta', Politička misao, 56(2), str. 7-40. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01
Vancouver Jurak K. Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta. Politička misao [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 27.02.2021.];56(2):7-40. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01
IEEE K. Jurak, "Historijskomaterijalistička kritika postmarksizma: problem revolucionarnog subjekta", Politička misao, vol.56, br. 2, str. 7-40, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.2.01
Sažetak Marxist theory, as all other theories, is subject to the consequences of the division of labour into the material and the mental one. In The German Ideology Marx marked this division as the first real division of labour in class societies. Regarding Marxism itself, the consequences of this division are very obvious especially within the phenomenon of so-called Western Marxism, but most of all in post-Marxist transformations. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to apply the method of historical materialism to post-Marxism itself and to describe and explain the transformations of revolutionary subjectivities which follow this mutation in Marxist theory. Before that, it is necessary to roughly outline the periodization of Marxism relying on some terms coined by Perry Anderson and, on that trajectory, to present post-Marxism as the second phase of Western Marxism. Thus, the central part of the paper focuses on the main characteristics of post-Marxism such as replacement of class politics with identity politics, the particularisation and fragmentation of social struggles, and their cooptation in the dominant socio-political framework. All of that is accompanied by remarks on some changes in the relations of production and the concomitant neoliberal turn in the economic, political and cultural agenda. In order to allow for a better understanding of it all, a short review of some post-Marxist forerunners and theoretical concepts which have noticeably influenced post-Marxist theories is offered. This is followed by explanations of the most prominent examples of the constitution of different revolutionary subjectivities in some post-Marxist theories. Finally, the necessity of overcoming these particular positions and theoretically affirming universalism, including its practico-political importance and potentiality, is emphasized. This paves the way for the return to the historical sources of Marxism, which are what allowed for its auto-reflexivity in the first place.