hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Review article

Taricco II and Weighing the Interests at Stake: the Constitutional Principle of Legality in Criminal Law and the Effectiveness of EU Law

Gordana Materljan ; Europska komisija, Luxembourg
Igor Materljan ; Europska komisija, Luxembourg

Fulltext: croatian, pdf (420 KB) pages 503-528 downloads: 127* cite
APA 6th Edition
Materljan, G. & Materljan, I. (2019). Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 26 (2), 503-528. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776
MLA 8th Edition
Materljan, Gordana and Igor Materljan. "Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol. 26, no. 2, 2019, pp. 503-528. https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776. Accessed 28 Jul. 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Materljan, Gordana and Igor Materljan. "Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 26, no. 2 (2019): 503-528. https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776
Harvard
Materljan, G., and Materljan, I. (2019). 'Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije', Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 26(2), pp. 503-528. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776 (Accessed 28 July 2021)
Vancouver
Materljan G, Materljan I. Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 July 28];26(2):503-528. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776
IEEE
G. Materljan and I. Materljan, "Predmet Taricco II i pitanja na vagi: ustavno načelo zakonitosti u kaznenom pravu i djelotvornost prava Europske unije", Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol.26, no. 2, pp. 503-528, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776. [Accessed: 28 July 2021]

Abstracts
With its Taricco II judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) reopened
discussion on the fundamental characteristics of European Union law, namely supremacy, the
unity and effectiveness of that law, and its impact on the protection of fundamental rights
afforded by the constitutional courts of Member States. In weighing the interests at stake, i.e.
the effectiveness of Union law against a higher level of protection of fundamental rights at the
national level, the CJEU gives priority to the effectiveness principle. The CJEU has thus developed
its own standards of protection of fundamental rights, which must be applied uniformly
in all Member States. Such practices provoke resistance and disagreement among scholars.
This article analyses the aspects of EU law that have not been fully clarified by that judgment.

Keywords
offences relating to value added tax; limitation periods; principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law; activities affecting the financial interests of the EU; direct effect of EU law; obligation to disapply provisions of national law; judgment Taricco I; judgment Taricco II

Hrčak ID: 232776

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/232776

[croatian]

Visits: 246 *