hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Stručni rad

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Croatian Criminal Justice: implementation Requirements and Possible Solutions

Marin Bonačić ; Pravni fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (229 KB) str. 655-667 preuzimanja: 219* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Bonačić, M. (2019). Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 26 (2), 655-667. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781
MLA 8th Edition
Bonačić, Marin. "Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol. 26, br. 2, 2019, str. 655-667. https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781. Citirano 20.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Bonačić, Marin. "Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 26, br. 2 (2019): 655-667. https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781
Harvard
Bonačić, M. (2019). 'Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja', Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 26(2), str. 655-667. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781 (Datum pristupa: 20.06.2021.)
Vancouver
Bonačić M. Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 20.06.2021.];26(2):655-667. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781
IEEE
M. Bonačić, "Ured europskog javnog tužitelja i hrvatsko kazneno pravosuđe: implementacijski zahtjevi i moguća rješenja", Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol.26, br. 2, str. 655-667, 2019. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781. [Citirano: 20.06.2021.]

Sažetak
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) was set up in 2017, after successfully
completing the legislative process that began in 2013. The EPPO is conceived as an EU
body with legal personality and acts as a single office with a decentralised structure which,
in addition to the central office, also operates in the participating EU Member States. Council
Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment
of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office sets certain implementing obligations
for the national legal systems of those States. Although regulations are EU legal acts that are
binding in their entirety and directly applicable, the EPPO Regulation nevertheless requires
certain interventions for the purpose of implementation. Specifically, the Regulation refers to
the application of national law to the extent that a matter is not regulated by the Regulation,
prescribes certain minimum investigative powers that States should provide to the EPPO, and
opts for a prosecutorial inquiry model.
The paper discusses the implementation requirements that the Regulation places before
the Croatian criminal justice system, especially with regard to the implementation of the Office’s
structure, its material competence and the exercise of its prosecutorial and investigative
powers. It considers what has been done so far, gives an overview of the proposed solutions,
outlines the comparative legal solutions available, and makes suggestions for resolving some
of the requirements. In this regard, the analysis shows that the powers of the Croatian State
Attorney in criminal proceedings are largely in line with the requirements of the Regulation
and that there are therefore no major implementation obligations.

Ključne riječi
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office; European Public Prosecutor; EPPO; European Delegated Prosecutors; implementation

Hrčak ID: 232781

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/232781

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 376 *