hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1

(IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic

Josip Berdica   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0326 ; Faculty of Law Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia
Toni Pranić ; Faculty of Law Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (153 KB) str. 3-19 preuzimanja: 140* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Berdica, J. i Pranić, T. (2019). (IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic. Disputatio philosophica, 21 (1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1
MLA 8th Edition
Berdica, Josip i Toni Pranić. "(IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic." Disputatio philosophica, vol. 21, br. 1, 2019, str. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1. Citirano 12.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Berdica, Josip i Toni Pranić. "(IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic." Disputatio philosophica 21, br. 1 (2019): 3-19. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1
Harvard
Berdica, J., i Pranić, T. (2019). '(IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic', Disputatio philosophica, 21(1), str. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1
Vancouver
Berdica J, Pranić T. (IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic. Disputatio philosophica [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 12.06.2021.];21(1):3-19. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1
IEEE
J. Berdica i T. Pranić, "(IN)JUSTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. A brief reflection on a major topic", Disputatio philosophica, vol.21, br. 1, str. 3-19, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.21.1.1

Sažetak
Environmental issues are among the most critical scientific and social problems of today. The human environment is an environment of inequality and crisis, and a platform for debate on the fairness of social order. The crisis is the result of human behaviour, which reflects the failure of development and unjust distribution of consequences. The gap between rich and poor on a global scale is evident in the is proportionate climate change impacts on countries and their ability to cope. In this respect, the economic and political inequalities between First and Third World countries are fortified by ecological ones. The development of international environmental mechanisms such as the Kyoto Agreement is instrumental in this kind of change. The pursuit of tackling and controlling climate change has its unforeseen consequences, whereas in specific communities the existent inequalities are emphasised in new forms. If mechanisms developed for the environment, such as the market of carbon emissions and the carbon balance, lead to environmental injustice and disproportionately affects vulnerable groups, it raises the question of their purpose. On the path of Rawl’s idea on the fairness of social institutions, such system demonstrates itself as contradictory and unjust.

Ključne riječi
Carbon market; Ecology; Justice; Kyoto agreement; Social inequalities

Hrčak ID: 232948

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/232948

Posjeta: 362 *