Zbornik, Vol. 40 No. 3, 2019.
Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.2
PRIORITY OF THE LAW OVER THE IDEAS OF GOOD: RAWLS’S JURIDICAL CONSTRUCTIVISM REVISITED
Petar Popović
orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-0850
; Fakultet kanonskog prava, Papinsko sveučilište Sveti križ, Rim, Italija
Sažetak
In the paper, the author analyzes the concept of law in John Rawls’s political conception of justice. After analyzing Rawls’s relevant texts that contain certain elements of the argument for the concept of law as an institution, of the legal system, of legal norms and of the rights, as well as the secondary literature on these texts, the metajuridical foundation of the concept of law is researched. The author then claims that Rawls’s argument for the priority of right over ideas of good is the central thesis
for an adequate understanding of his legal constructivism. It is then affirmed that we can legitimately refer to his thought on the subject under the rubric of the priority of the law over the ideas of the good. Rawls’s conception of the natural rights is researched next. The paper concludes with the evaluation of the results of the whole line of analysis, especially with regard to the place of Rawls’s concept of law within the contemporary juridical-philosophical debates.
Ključne riječi
John Rawls; priority of right over ideas of good; legal constructivism; natural right
Hrčak ID:
233520
URI
Datum izdavanja:
24.1.2020.
Posjeta: 1.474 *