hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1

The Nicolo affair (State Council, Assembly, October 20, 1989). Analysis of a "reversal" of jurisprudence

Jacques Caillosse ; l’Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris-2

Puni tekst: francuski, pdf (252 KB) str. 1-12 preuzimanja: 804* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Caillosse, J. (2020). L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 57 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1
MLA 8th Edition
Caillosse, Jacques. "L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, vol. 57, br. 1, 2020, str. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1. Citirano 20.10.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Caillosse, Jacques. "L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 57, br. 1 (2020): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1
Harvard
Caillosse, J. (2020). 'L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence', Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 57(1), str. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1
Vancouver
Caillosse J. L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 20.10.2021.];57(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1
IEEE
J. Caillosse, "L’ affaire Nicolo (Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 20 octobre 1989).- Analyse d’un « revirement » de jurisprudence", Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, vol.57, br. 1, str. 1-12, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.1

Sažetak
The State Council has for a long time acknowledged the primacy of international contracts, in particular contracts of the European Union, exclusively over the laws passed earlier. In retrospect after the decision of the Constitutional Council Val d’Oise elections (Elections du Val d’Oise) and accepting the conclusions of public reporter Frydman, the State Council changed its court practice with the Nicolo judgement acknowledging the primacy of contracts of the European Union, as well as classic international contracts, even over laws passed after them. Furthermore, in contrast to Kasacian Court judgements, explanation of the State Council neglects the argument of the specifics of European constitutional order and only calls upon article 55 of the Constitution stating the reciprocity clause. Thereby the administrative judge je recognised the primacy of European acts of secondary law, i.e.: regulation, directive, and general principles of European law.

Ključne riječi
case of Nicolo; State Council; primacy of European acts

Hrčak ID: 234522

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/234522

[hrvatski] [francuski]

Posjeta: 1.035 *