APA 6th Edition Berčić, B. (2019). I Was Right!. Prolegomena, 18 (2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
MLA 8th Edition Berčić, Boran. "I Was Right!." Prolegomena, vol. 18, br. 2, 2019, str. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110. Citirano 15.07.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Berčić, Boran. "I Was Right!." Prolegomena 18, br. 2 (2019): 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
Harvard Berčić, B. (2019). 'I Was Right!', Prolegomena, 18(2), str. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
Vancouver Berčić B. I Was Right!. Prolegomena [Internet]. 2019 [pristupljeno 15.07.2020.];18(2):209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
IEEE B. Berčić, "I Was Right!", Prolegomena, vol.18, br. 2, str. 209-225, 2019. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
Sažetak In this article author discusses the problem of the future contingents. He wants to show that the same problem holds for a number of related cases like decisions, promises, beginnings, birth dates, moral luck, post-mortal harms, etc. The focus of the article is on the question of when and how statements about the future acquire their truth values. Author argues that truth is a relational property that statements acquire when the events that they talk about occur. For this reason, the meanings of statements like I was right! or I knew! should not be taken at their face value but rather reinterpreted according to the proposed theory. Also, several other accounts are criticised and rejected: causal determinism, thin red line, eternalism and realism about the future.