hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Preliminary communication

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection

Valsamis Mitsilegas ; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Fulltext: english, pdf (221 KB) pages 79-88 downloads: 11* cite
APA 6th Edition
Mitsilegas, V. (2020). The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection . Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27 (1), 79-88. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906
MLA 8th Edition
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. "The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection ." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol. 27, no. 1, 2020, pp. 79-88. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906. Accessed 24 Nov. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. "The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection ." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 27, no. 1 (2020): 79-88. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906
Harvard
Mitsilegas, V. (2020). 'The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection ', Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27(1), pp. 79-88. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906 (Accessed 24 November 2020)
Vancouver
Mitsilegas V. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection . Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 November 24];27(1):79-88. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906
IEEE
V. Mitsilegas, "The European Public Prosecutor’s Office between EU and National Law: The Challenge of Effective Judicial Protection ", Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol.27, no. 1, pp. 79-88, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906. [Accessed: 24 November 2020]

Abstracts
Even though the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) aims
to Europeanise prosecution, the relationship between EU and national
law is not always clear, and many areas concerning the EPPO are left
to national laws to regulate. As a consequence, effective judicial protection and remedies are not secured in the EPPO Regulation. Bearing
in mind that the EPPO is a European agency, fundamental rights and
the rule of law must be safeguarded in its operation. The focus of this
article is on three levels of effective judicial protection in the operation
of the Regulation at the EU level: preliminary questions before the
CJEU, EU benchmarks on the rights of the defence, and the relationship
between the EPPO and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). The article aims to shed light on the gaps in, but also on the potential avenues for, effective judicial protection in the context of the operation of the EPPO.

Keywords
EPPO; effective judicial protection; Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU); defence rights; OLAF

Hrčak ID: 244906

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/244906

[croatian]

Visits: 32 *