hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, Vol. 27 No. 1, 2020.

Sažetak sa skupa

Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Maja Munivrana Vajda ; Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (118 KB) str. 117-119 preuzimanja: 35* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, M. (2020). Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27 (1), 117-119. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
MLA 8th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, Maja. "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol. 27, br. 1, 2020, str. 117-119. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909. Citirano 19.04.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, Maja. "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 27, br. 1 (2020): 117-119. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
Harvard
Munivrana Vajda, M. (2020). 'Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office', Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27(1), str. 117-119. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909 (Datum pristupa: 19.04.2021.)
Vancouver
Munivrana Vajda M. Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 19.04.2021.];27(1):117-119. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
IEEE
M. Munivrana Vajda, "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office", Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol.27, br. 1, str. 117-119, 2020. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909. [Citirano: 19.04.2021.]

Sažetak
The criteria for choosing EPPO jurisdiction are very vague and have implications on legal certainty. Particularly controversial is the establishment of jurisdiction based on the so-called "focus of activity" and the place where the “bulk of the offences” were committed. In addition, problems can occur when applying the provision that jurisdiction is determined according to the place where the main financial damage occurred, especially from the perspective of Croatian law, since, according to the criminal offence of subsidy fraud under Art. 258 of the Croatian Criminal Code, damage is not an element of the offence. Thus, it is possible for Croatia to lose jurisdiction, even when under Croatian law the offence is committed exclusively on Croatian territory.

Ključne riječi
EPPO jurisdiction

Projekti
HRZZ / IP / IP-2013-11-8282 / CoCoCrim - Hrvatska pravosudna suradnja u kaznenim stvarima u Europskoj uniji i regiji: nasljeđe prošlosti i izazovi budućnosti

Hrčak ID: 244909

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909

Posjeta: 93 *