hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Meeting abstract

Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Maja Munivrana Vajda ; Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Fulltext: english, pdf (118 KB) pages 117-119 downloads: 37* cite
APA 6th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, M. (2020). Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27 (1), 117-119. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
MLA 8th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, Maja. "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol. 27, no. 1, 2020, pp. 117-119. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909. Accessed 6 May 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Munivrana Vajda, Maja. "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office." Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 27, no. 1 (2020): 117-119. https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
Harvard
Munivrana Vajda, M. (2020). 'Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office', Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 27(1), pp. 117-119. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909 (Accessed 06 May 2021)
Vancouver
Munivrana Vajda M. Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 06];27(1):117-119. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909
IEEE
M. Munivrana Vajda, "Questioning the Jurisdiction of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office", Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, vol.27, no. 1, pp. 117-119, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909. [Accessed: 06 May 2021]

Abstracts
The criteria for choosing EPPO jurisdiction are very vague and have implications on legal certainty. Particularly controversial is the establishment of jurisdiction based on the so-called "focus of activity" and the place where the “bulk of the offences” were committed. In addition, problems can occur when applying the provision that jurisdiction is determined according to the place where the main financial damage occurred, especially from the perspective of Croatian law, since, according to the criminal offence of subsidy fraud under Art. 258 of the Croatian Criminal Code, damage is not an element of the offence. Thus, it is possible for Croatia to lose jurisdiction, even when under Croatian law the offence is committed exclusively on Croatian territory.

Keywords
EPPO jurisdiction

Projects
HRZZ / IP / IP-2013-11-8282 / CoCoCrim - Croatian Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters in the EU and the Region: Heritage of the Past and Challenges of the Future

Hrčak ID: 244909

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/244909

Visits: 100 *