hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616

Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review

Azra Jeleskovic
Lejla Redzepagic-Vrazalica
Vildana Dzemidzic
Alisa Tiro
Enita Nakas

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (90 KB) str. 16-21 preuzimanja: 77* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Jeleskovic, A., Redzepagic-Vrazalica, L., Dzemidzic, V., Tiro, A. i Nakas, E. (2020). Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 7 (1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616
MLA 8th Edition
Jeleskovic, Azra, et al. "Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review." South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, vol. 7, br. 1, 2020, str. 16-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616. Citirano 16.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Jeleskovic, Azra, Lejla Redzepagic-Vrazalica, Vildana Dzemidzic, Alisa Tiro i Enita Nakas. "Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review." South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research 7, br. 1 (2020): 16-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616
Harvard
Jeleskovic, A., et al. (2020). 'Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review', South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 7(1), str. 16-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616
Vancouver
Jeleskovic A, Redzepagic-Vrazalica L, Dzemidzic V, Tiro A, Nakas E. Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research [Internet]. 2020 [pristupljeno 16.06.2021.];7(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616
IEEE
A. Jeleskovic, L. Redzepagic-Vrazalica, V. Dzemidzic, A. Tiro i E. Nakas, "Choice of the Retention Method After an Orthodontic Treatment-Narative review", South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, vol.7, br. 1, str. 16-21, 2020. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr7-24616

Sažetak
Retention is a phase of orthodontic treatment devised to keep the teeth in a correct position once the orthodontic treatment has been completed. There are three main characteristics that each ideal retainer is required to have: to keep the teeth in the correct position after orthodontic therapy, to be long lasting and resistant to mechanical damage, and to have no adverse long-term effects on periodontal tissue.

Through a computer-based browsing through a number of databases (such as, e.g. PubMed and Google Scholar) we have found and analysed various articles used in this research. The inclusion criteria to be met were: an overall availability of a research paper, the requirement that these research papers are published in English, that these research papers were published in the period 2007-2019, the requirement that the research papers should involve clinically randomized studies and that their titles contain one of the predefined keywords.

The database browsing that is based on the said keywords and carried out within the above time frame has resulted in finding 165 relevant articles. A complete set of the inclusion criteria were met by 8 published research papers, but 7 articles were analysed in the end. The selected articles have compared different types of fixed and mobile retainers, different times of wearing the retainers, the impact that the retainers had on the periodontium, and the acceptability of different retention protocols for patients.

The conclusion of this research paper is that bonded retainers prove to be most effective in stabilising the position of the incisors, particularly the lower ones, but that their disadvantages include the reopening of the extraction space and the retention of plaque due to difficulties in maintaining oral hygiene. Vacuum-formed retainers appear to be more effective than Hawley retainers in retaining the position of the incisors, and patients have indicated that they are more acceptable to wear. Hawley retainers prove to be most effective in preserving a closed extraction space, but they do now show solid results with regard to other segments. Changes in the overbite, overjet, arch length, and anterior and posterior widths did not show any significant statistical differences in the different types of retainers.

Ključne riječi
orthodontics, retention, stability,

Hrčak ID: 246959

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/246959

Posjeta: 177 *