hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

THE PARADOX OF THE WRITTEN CONSTITUTION

Davor Rodin ; Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (239 KB) str. 76-92 preuzimanja: 513* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Rodin, D. (2001). Paradoks pisanog ustava. Politička misao, 38 (4), 76-92. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367
MLA 8th Edition
Rodin, Davor. "Paradoks pisanog ustava." Politička misao, vol. 38, br. 4, 2001, str. 76-92. https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367. Citirano 21.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Rodin, Davor. "Paradoks pisanog ustava." Politička misao 38, br. 4 (2001): 76-92. https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367
Harvard
Rodin, D. (2001). 'Paradoks pisanog ustava', Politička misao, 38(4), str. 76-92. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367 (Datum pristupa: 21.09.2020.)
Vancouver
Rodin D. Paradoks pisanog ustava. Politička misao [Internet]. 2001 [pristupljeno 21.09.2020.];38(4):76-92. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367
IEEE
D. Rodin, "Paradoks pisanog ustava", Politička misao, vol.38, br. 4, str. 76-92, 2001. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367. [Citirano: 21.09.2020.]

Sažetak
Using Luhmann’s terminology, the author promotes the thesis that internal changes of constitutions are a non-democratic constitutional/legal process and thus a political problem. Namely, a constitution is exposed to political life, but also to an unmarked place within a constitutional system. This place is marked by constitutional judges who change constitutions on a case by case basis, either innovatively, precedently or, of course, non-democratically. Since democratic politics and constitutional law are different forms of activity, the question is which is the criterion for appraising the new things. How, then, to reject something as unlawful and non-political? The author claims that this judgement can only be done by people with a refined moral sense. This requires the inclusion of those who create and interpret constitutions as the law of the polity so they ought to be selected very carefully. Thus, citizens are doubly burdened: first, they have to understand constitutional changes in order to perceive their interest in them and second, they have to appreciate the architects of constitutions in order to trust into them.

Ključne riječi
autopoietic system; democratic politics; unmarked place; constitution; constitutional right; constitutional court

Hrčak ID: 24367

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/24367

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 873 *