APA 6th Edition Miščević, N. (2000). How Successful is Nation-State?. Politička misao, 37 (5), 160-173. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749
MLA 8th Edition Miščević, Nenad. "How Successful is Nation-State?." Politička misao, vol. 37, br. 5, 2000, str. 160-173. https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749. Citirano 04.03.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Miščević, Nenad. "How Successful is Nation-State?." Politička misao 37, br. 5 (2000): 160-173. https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749
Harvard Miščević, N. (2000). 'How Successful is Nation-State?', Politička misao, 37(5), str. 160-173. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749 (Datum pristupa: 04.03.2021.)
Vancouver Miščević N. How Successful is Nation-State?. Politička misao [Internet]. 2000 [pristupljeno 04.03.2021.];37(5):160-173. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749
IEEE N. Miščević, "How Successful is Nation-State?", Politička misao, vol.37, br. 5, str. 160-173, 2000. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/26749. [Citirano: 04.03.2021.]
Sažetak The paper discusses pro-nationalist authors (D. Miller, A. Oldenquist, M.Canovan) who claim that states formed around a particular ethno-cultural nation have been historically sucessful, in terms of economic success, justice, democracy and solidarity. It is argued that their claims fail: in typical and wellknown cases there is an inverse correlation between the strenght of nationalism and the satisfaction of demands of justice, democracy and solidarity. Some hypotheses about the causes for this inverse relation are proposed.