APA 6th Edition Häberle, P. (2000). Ustav kao kultura. Politička misao, 37 (3), 3-21. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083
MLA 8th Edition Häberle, Peter. "Ustav kao kultura." Politička misao, vol. 37, no. 3, 2000, pp. 3-21. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083. Accessed 24 Oct. 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Häberle, Peter. "Ustav kao kultura." Politička misao 37, no. 3 (2000): 3-21. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083
Harvard Häberle, P. (2000). 'Ustav kao kultura', Politička misao, 37(3), pp. 3-21. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083 (Accessed 24 October 2021)
Vancouver Häberle P. Ustav kao kultura. Politička misao [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2021 October 24];37(3):3-21. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083
IEEE P. Häberle, "Ustav kao kultura", Politička misao, vol.37, no. 3, pp. 3-21, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27083. [Accessed: 24 October 2021]
Abstracts The author considers constitutions not solely as legal systems intended primarily for lawyers but also as the legal expression of the state of cultural development, a means of cultural self-representation of a people, a mirror of its cultural heritage and the foundation of its hopes. He thinks that an interpretation of the state, besides the standard three elements, should include culture, if not as its “first” then at least as its fourth element. Häberle thinks that the concept of the constitution should not be fixated upon the state.