APA 6th Edition GRBAC, J. (2003). Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi. Bogoslovska smotra, 73 (2-3), 313-328. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831
MLA 8th Edition GRBAC, Josip. "Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi." Bogoslovska smotra, vol. 73, br. 2-3, 2003, str. 313-328. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831. Citirano 26.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition GRBAC, Josip. "Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi." Bogoslovska smotra 73, br. 2-3 (2003): 313-328. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831
Harvard GRBAC, J. (2003). 'Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi', Bogoslovska smotra, 73(2-3), str. 313-328. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831 (Datum pristupa: 26.11.2020.)
Vancouver GRBAC J. Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi. Bogoslovska smotra [Internet]. 2003 [pristupljeno 26.11.2020.];73(2-3):313-328. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831
IEEE J. GRBAC, "Mogućnosti i izazovi etičkoga i moralnoga pluralizma u Crkvi", Bogoslovska smotra, vol.73, br. 2-3, str. 313-328, 2003. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27831. [Citirano: 26.11.2020.]
Sažetak Without a doubt, the negative approach to religious and ethical pluralism in the modern world is not supported by Church documents. Can the same be said of moral pluralism within the Catholic Church, on the theoretical or practical level? Some Church documents taking into consideration the ecumenical plan, present defined limits for pluralism with the objective that pluralism might not become syncretism (»Dominus Iesus«), but also with regards to moral pluralism, preventing a relativisation of the natural law or (he absolute acceptance of (he individual conscience (»Veritatis splendor«). These possibilities does not seem to exist when taking into consideration relevant Church documents and the efforts by leading moral theologians to open the door to moral pluralism. A pluralism that presupposes that it is possible to legitimately teach and operate differently from the Church's teaching office becomes difficult to find a basis in these teachings when it represents the truth which the office considers to be a part of the natural moral law or and when it presents norms with respect to the practice of these teachings.
It is possible to think in terms of pluralicity when considering the implications of natural moral law, and the question of human nature and its immutability. When considering the practical deeds of the believer it is possible that there exist a pluralicity of behaviour, that is, when the individual thinks he can justify something in his conscience, within the so-called »forum internum«. However, this can never become a permanent »right« that he behaves in such a manner or that others may behave in a similar way. This momently »right« is legitimate if it favours the objective truth.