APA 6th Edition ŠARČEVIĆ, I. (2003). Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga. Bogoslovska smotra, 73 (2-3), 433-453. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836
MLA 8th Edition ŠARČEVIĆ, Ivan. "Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga." Bogoslovska smotra, vol. 73, no. 2-3, 2003, pp. 433-453. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836. Accessed 23 Jan. 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition ŠARČEVIĆ, Ivan. "Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga." Bogoslovska smotra 73, no. 2-3 (2003): 433-453. https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836
Harvard ŠARČEVIĆ, I. (2003). 'Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga', Bogoslovska smotra, 73(2-3), pp. 433-453. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836 (Accessed 23 January 2021)
Vancouver ŠARČEVIĆ I. Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga. Bogoslovska smotra [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2021 January 23];73(2-3):433-453. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836
IEEE I. ŠARČEVIĆ, "Pluralizam i univerzalnost patnje. Pretpostavke međureligijskog dijaloga", Bogoslovska smotra, vol.73, no. 2-3, pp. 433-453, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/27836. [Accessed: 23 January 2021]
Abstracts In the after-war erosion of trust between peoples and religions in Bosnia and Hercegovina inter-religious dialogue is necessity regardless of the fact that the majority of the people deems it impossible and unnecessary. Its foundation rests on the anthropological dimension: man builds his subjectivity, his identity - as an individual and person -in the coexistence with other and different people. Tolerance and pluralism are not the goal of inter-religious dialogue but its means and framework within which the freedom of others and their faith are respected and people are striving for mutual recognition, community and common good. In the complex surrounding of Bosnian society, determined by the consequences of war, post-communist mentality, »clash of civilizations« and globalisation, all four classical levels of dialogue appear as an urgent task: dialogue in life, dialogue in action, the dialogue of theologians, and dialogue on the basis of religious experience. However, there are necessary presuppositions - three responsibilities — for the achievement of inter-religious dialogue on these levels. The first responsibility is the one before God or self-criticism based on faith. The second responsibility is the one for others or the universality of suffering. The third responsibility is the one for common good or the universality of human rights, inter-religious dialogue is the constitutive part of the confession and witness of one's own faith.