APA 6th Edition Kurelić, Z. (1998). Arendt v. Kedourie. Politička misao, 35 (1), 138-151. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569
MLA 8th Edition Kurelić, Zoran. "Arendt v. Kedourie." Politička misao, vol. 35, br. 1, 1998, str. 138-151. https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569. Citirano 14.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Kurelić, Zoran. "Arendt v. Kedourie." Politička misao 35, br. 1 (1998): 138-151. https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569
Harvard Kurelić, Z. (1998). 'Arendt v. Kedourie', Politička misao, 35(1), str. 138-151. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569 (Datum pristupa: 14.06.2021.)
Vancouver Kurelić Z. Arendt v. Kedourie. Politička misao [Internet]. 1998 [pristupljeno 14.06.2021.];35(1):138-151. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569
IEEE Z. Kurelić, "Arendt v. Kedourie", Politička misao, vol.35, br. 1, str. 138-151, 1998. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/33569. [Citirano: 14.06.2021.]
Sažetak In his study, the author analyses two different views of nationalism: Arendt's and Kedourie's. Hannah Arendt focuses on the link between racism, nationalism, and imperialism. According to her, nationalism differs from totalitarianism, which represents a more recent development. Kedourie sets out from Acton's critique of the French revolution and concludes that radical nationalism is a product of Franco-German national tensions. Finally, the author offers both concepts as his contribution to an easier understanding of the antagonisms which brought about the war on the territory of the former Yugoslavia.