hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

Public policy as a ground for setting aside of an arbitral award

Hrvoje Sikirić ; Faculty of law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (172 KB) str. 225-268 preuzimanja: 1.591* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Sikirić, H. (2009). Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 59 (2-3), 225-268. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463
MLA 8th Edition
Sikirić, Hrvoje. "Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, vol. 59, br. 2-3, 2009, str. 225-268. https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463. Citirano 17.09.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Sikirić, Hrvoje. "Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 59, br. 2-3 (2009): 225-268. https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463
Harvard
Sikirić, H. (2009). 'Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka', Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 59(2-3), str. 225-268. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463 (Datum pristupa: 17.09.2021.)
Vancouver
Sikirić H. Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu [Internet]. 2009 [pristupljeno 17.09.2021.];59(2-3):225-268. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463
IEEE
H. Sikirić, "Javni poredak kao razlog za poništaj pravorijeka", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, vol.59, br. 2-3, str. 225-268, 2009. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463. [Citirano: 17.09.2021.]

Sažetak
The paper analyses public policy as a ground for setting aside of an arbitral award. After considering public policy as a ground for refusal of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the author explains that in such a case the notion of "public policy" should be interpreted as "international public policy". Further analysis focuses on solutions of various national laws on arbitration in regard to public policy as a ground for setting aside of a domestic award. Turning back to the Croatian arbitration law, the author submits that the provision of Art. 36. para. 2. point 2 (b) of the Croatian Arbitration Act which provides that the court shall set aside an arbitral award on its own motion if it finds that the award is in conflict with the public policy of the Republic of Croatia ought not to be interpreted as the public policy means "all mandatory rules" of the Croatian law. In contrast, the notion of "public policy" should be interpreted in the same manner as in the case of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Ključne riječi
arbitration; arbitral award; setting aside of an arbitral award; recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award; public policy; mandatory rules

Hrčak ID: 35463

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/35463

[hrvatski] [njemački]

Posjeta: 3.198 *