APA 6th Edition Grušovnik, T. (2009). A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy. Synthesis philosophica, 24 (1), 117-130. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159
MLA 8th Edition Grušovnik, Tomaž. "A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009, pp. 117-130. https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159. Accessed 15 Nov. 2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Grušovnik, Tomaž. "A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy." Synthesis philosophica 24, no. 1 (2009): 117-130. https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159
Harvard Grušovnik, T. (2009). 'A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy', Synthesis philosophica, 24(1), pp. 117-130. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159 (Accessed 15 November 2019)
Vancouver Grušovnik T. A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2019 November 15];24(1):117-130. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159
IEEE T. Grušovnik, "A Distant View. Globalization inside Philosophy", Synthesis philosophica, vol.24, no. 1, pp. 117-130, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/41159. [Accessed: 15 November 2019]
Abstracts When tackling with the issue of globalization in the context of philosophy, this article takes somewhat different route than expected: it doesn’t ponder upon the meaning and the consequences of the processes we call ‘global’, but instead tries to find out how philosophy, theoretical and literary production themselves have been affected by globalization. Instead of an attempt to immediately “think the globalization” it tries to show what “globalization has done to thinking”.
In order to illustrate this point three main areas to be explored are taken into account: Africa, Latin America and India. They are chosen on the basis of being representative regions of the so-called “Third-World” or “Global South”. Main idea, taken from the arguments of P. Hountondji is that philosophical and theoretical productions mimic economic one; a fortiori: they are actually the same process. This point is illustrated in a number of cases. Further, the paper tries to show that, in spite of huge differences in hermeneutical outlooks, geographical distance and successive traditions, all “Third-World” philosophical/literary production faces similar fate, what could be a consequence of its structural positioning in a contemporary “World-System”.
However, the authors who come from “peripheral” areas of theoretical production don’t only face similar problems but, as shown, also share similar ideas of what could be done in order to minimize and level out the imbalance and asymmetrical position of their cultures.